|
11/1
11/2
11/3
11/4
11/5
11/6
11/7
11/8
11/9
11/10
11/11
11/12
11/13
11/14
11/15
11/16
11/17
11/18
11/19
11/20
11/21
11/22
11/23
11/24
11/25
11/26
11/27
11/28
11/29
11/30 |
|
November 30, 2005
(top)
|
Physician's pride in serving humanity: 20,000 dead babies -
Stephanie Simon (Los Angeles Times)
Dr. William F. Harrison has forgotten how many children the
woman had. He remembers she was poor and, most vividly, he
remembers her response when a physician diagnosed her distended
stomach as pregnancy. "Oh, God, doctor," the woman said.
"I was hoping it was cancer." This was in 1967. Harrison
was a medical student and his wife was expecting their third
child. It had never occurred to him that a woman would be
anything but happy to learn she was pregnant. . . . Harrison
opened an obstetrics and gynecology practice, but after the
Supreme Court established abortion as a constitutional right in
1973, he decided to take on an additional specialty. Now 70,
Harrison estimates he's terminated at least 20,000 pregnancies.
Bill O'Reilly on Iraq
War: "Win It!" - Mark Finkelstein (NewsBusters.org)
This morning on the Today Show, Katie Couric wanted Bill
O'Reilly's view of the President's impending speech on Iraq, but
she got more than she bargained for: Couric: What is your
biggest fear about a premature withdrawal of troops from Iraq?
O'Reilly: It's very simple. This is not a complicated issue. If
we pull out of Iraq it turns into a terror state, just as
Afghanistan before 9/11 was a terror state. The terrorists are
going to do whatever they want there. Who's going to stop them?
Iran, Syria? They're going to help them! An Iraq out of control
is a direct threat to the United States because Al-Qaida gets in
there and does whatever they want. Win the damn thing! That's
what I want to hear. Win it. Stop the excuses, stop the carping,
stop the sniping from the press. Win it!
The U.N. must not be allowed to destroy the Volcker
investigation's archives - Claudia Rosett (OpinionJournal.com)
Paul Volcker's findings on Oil for Food have been widely
received as the final word on the United Nations relief program
for Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Far from it--as Mr. Volcker himself
has admitted. In reporting that Saddam, along with his smuggling
and oil graft, diverted $1.8 billion in kickbacks from
U.N.-approved relief contracts under the program, Mr. Volcker
underestimates, quite probably by billions, the amount the U.N.
allowed Saddam Hussein and many of his favored business partners
to graft out of Oil for Food deals for goods such as oil parts,
milk, laundry soap and baby food. In low-balling the total, Mr.
Volcker understates the negligence of the U.N., and overlooks
some of the most potentially virulent links in Oil for Food.
The most urgent implication of Mr. Volcker's incomplete findings
is that his huge and expensively assembled archives must be
preserved intact well beyond the Dec. 31 deadline by which Mr.
Volcker now plans to start disposing of them. Above all, they
must not be handed back to the U.N., where too much related to
the corrupt Oil for Food program has already
vanished--including, to a fascinating extent, Secretary-General
Kofi Annan's own powers of recollection. The former head of the
program, Benon Sevan, alleged to have taken bribes from Saddam,
was allowed to skip town, U.N. pension in hand. Mr. Annan is
even now resurrecting, via a new $4 million U.N. program called
the Alliance of Civilizations, the career of his former chief of
staff, Iqbal Riza, who officially retired earlier this year
after it came to light that during Mr. Volcker's investigation
Mr. Riza had overseen the shredding of three years' worth of
documents that might have better illuminated the oil-for-fraud
shenanigans of the U.N.'s executive 38th floor.
|
|
November 29, 2005
(top)
|
Mike
Wallace slams Rather, Mapes and fake Bush-Guard story
(SeanRobins.com)
In an interviewed broadcast Monday on the O'Reilly Factor
(FOX News), long-time 60 Minutes anchor, and CBS newsman,
Mike Wallace, opened up to host Bill O'Reilly, and blasted
now-retired Dan Rather, and fired and disgraced 60 Minutes II
producer, Mary Mapes, for their parts in last Fall's debacle of
the fake Bush National Guard memos. Wallace, who is on the
talk circuit pushing his new book, Between You and Me: A
Memoir, displayed remarkable candor--though at times an
almost begrudging restraint--when discussing his view of the
choices made by Rather and Mapes, and made clear that he would
never have gone with the story without being able to prove the
documents authenticity. Quite a turnaround from the
posture that Rather and Co. took, and which Mapes recently
reaffirmed Oh--and Wallace said that he told Dan
Rather that he too should have left CBS when everyone else was
fired. Read on, McDuff . . .
|
BILL O'REILLY: Mary Mapes. I had her on the
broadcast. Did an extensive interview with her.
Millions of people watched it. She came off as
very unsteady. Her main thesis was well, they
haven't proved the documents about Bush National
Guard weren’t real, were not real. That was her
thesis. I said as an investigative reporter,
you’ve to use the same threshold you use in a
court of law. Beyond a reasonable doubt. If
there’s one doubt, you can't put them on the
air. How do you feel about it?
MIKE WALLACE: I think you're right. Simple
as that.
O'REILLY: Did you tell her that?
WALLACE: Did I tell her that? I had nothing
to do with it.
O'REILLY: No, but you're in the same
building over there at 60 Minutes.
WALLACE: Never met her.
O'REILLY: Really?
WALLACE: Never met Mary Mapes.
O'REILLY: She’s been at CBS for 28 years.
WALLACE: I know that. Me, I’ve been there
since 1963. I have never met her. She lives in
Texas. I’ve read a couple of things about it.
Look, I was there the weekend they were putting
it together. It was chaos.
O'REILLY: Chaos?
WALLACE: Yeah, it was. I didn't know what
they were doing, but it was -- they didn't want
us to know what they were doing. Dan Rather is
my friend, remains my friend. I have nothing but
respect for him. Nonetheless, truth to tell, he
has acknowledged to me that he did not see the
finished piece before it went on the air.
O'REILLY: Is that right? Too busy?
WALLACE: Yeah. Busy. One thing or another.
O'REILLY: But in a report that's going to
denigrate the President of the United States,
you would think that you would want to see it.
WALLACE: That's your view.
O'REILLY: You would want to see it, would
you not?
WALLACE: Damn right.
O'REILLY: Did you tell Rather that he
screwed it up?
WALLACE: I wondered -- I had a pleasant,
sensible discussion with Dan. I said everybody
who was involved with you in this thing,
everybody got fired. Why didn't you go with
them? Or did it never occur to you along the
way?
O'REILLY: You said that to Rather?
WALLACE: Of course. Everybody, everybody got
fired. And Dan didn't. Okay. He had a contract,
whatever. And I told this to Dan. Perhaps if you
had said, ‘hey, if they go, I go,’ the whole
thing would have been perceived as somewhat
different.
O'REILLY: You think he could have saved all
those people?
WALLACE: I don't know about that.
O'REILLY: Do you think he should have been
fired?
WALLACE: You don’t fire a man like Rather who’s
been with the company forever and has done
extraordinary things forever, no.
O'REILLY: Bottom line, the whole thing was a
fiasco, the Bush National Guard story and CBS
News, just a fiasco.
WALLACE: That's your
view.
O'REILLY: Is it yours?
WALLACE: I don't know enough about the
piece, honest.
O'REILLY: But if they cannot prove the
documents were real and they can't, isn't that
the definition of a journalistic fiasco?
WALLACE: Well, apparently, I’ve not -- as I
say, I’ve never met Mary Mapes.
O'REILLY: You're dancing.
WALLACE: I am dancing a little bit.
O'REILLY: You're doing the lambada here,
Mike.
WALLACE: Look, if I’d been there, I
wouldn't have gone on the air unless I was
certain.
O'REILLY: Beyond a reasonable doubt.
WALLACE: Yeah.
O'REILLY: Is Iraq Vietnam?
WALLACE: Say again?”
Wallace: “Well, you know, 58,000 people were
killed in Vietnam. It's a mere -- can you
imagine, Iraq is becoming a kind of Vietnam. We
should never have gone into Iraq. We were sold a
bill of goods. Now, whether the President was
sold a bill of goods or whether Dick Cheney was
sitting in the chair at that time, I don't
know.
O'REILLY: Well, it was Bush who made
the decision. Cheney encouraged it. |
"Holiday" returns to "Christmas" on Capitol Hill - Gary
Emerling (Washington Times)
House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert has told federal officials that
the lighted, decorated tree on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol
-- known in recent years as the "Holiday Tree" -- should be
renamed the "Capitol Christmas Tree," as it was called until the
late 1990s. The Capitol's senior landscape architect
confirmed the name switch yesterday for The Washington Times.
"It was known as the 'Holiday Tree' for several years and just
recently was changed back to the 'Capitol Christmas Tree.' This
was a directive from the speaker," said Capitol architect
Matthew Evans. "The speaker believes a Christmas tree is a
Christmas tree, and it is as simple as that," said Ron Bonjean,
spokesman for the Illinois Republican.
Mary Mapes' fraud continues unabated - Scott Johnson (Weekly
Standard)
Mary Mapes is back. With her memoir, Truth and Duty:
The Press, The President, and the Privilege of Power, the
former CBS News producer is trying to write a second act for her
career. Sadly, if her book is any indication, her second act is
just a repeat of the first. Mapes was the producer of the
CBS 60 Minutes II segment on President Bush's service in
the Texas Air National Guard that aired on September 8, 2004.
According to the segment, President Bush had received
preferential treatment in being admitted to the Guard, and once
in, had served dishonorably. The segment predicated the latter
theme on four 1972 and 1973 documents from the "personal file"
of Lieutenant Colonel Jerry Killian, then-Lt. Bush's commanding
officer in the Texas Air National Guard. CBS had obtained the
documents from a confidential source. In the online version of
the story, CBS posted PDF versions of the four documents.
|
|
November 28, 2005
(top)
|
Frank Rich's war:
The continuing lies by a New York Times "soldier"
- (New York Sun)
Those who charge
President Bush and Vice President Cheney with lying to get
America involved in the war in Iraq, as the New York Times
columnist Frank Rich did yesterday, have a special obligation to
get the truth correct themselves. It's one thing for Mr. Rich to
disagree with the decision to go to war in Iraq and to blame Mr.
Bush and Mr. Cheney for the decision. It's another for Mr. Rich
to accuse our elected leaders of misleading the country while
the columnist himself goes about misleading readers of The New
York Times. Mr. Rich's New York Times column yesterday
refers to Mr. Bush's 2003 State of the Union address with the
"bogus 16 words about Saddam's fictitious African uranium."
Those words were, "The British government has learned that
Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium
from Africa." But those 16 words are neither bogus nor
fictitious. They were and are true. A July 2004 report of the
bipartisan Senate Select Committee on Intelligence reported that
an Iraqi delegation visited Niger in June of 1999 and met with
Niger's then-prime minister, Ibrahim Mayaki. The committee
relayed that Mr. Mayaki said the meeting was about "expanding
commercial relations" between the two countries, which Mr.
Mayaki interpreted to mean "that the delegation wanted to
discuss uranium yellowcake sales."
Katrina: New Orleans disaster largely man-made - Lolis Eric
Elie (Times-Picayune)
Late last month,
while taking the bus tour of the Lower 9th Ward, Gwenith
Fletcher remarked, "I came to see what God had done."
Fletcher's sentiment parallels that of many people who see
Hurricane Katrina, and all of its devastation, as one of those
God-ordained natural disasters that happen sometimes, and reside
far beyond the control of mere mortals. But the more I
hear about the actions of our public officials in the years
leading up to the hurricane, the more convinced I am that this
was not a "natural disaster" in the usual sense of the phrase.
L.A.
County D.A.'s response to Stanley "Tookie" Williams' petition
for executive clemency (L.A. County District Attorney's
Office)
When one person kills another, there is immediate revulsion at
the nature of the crime. But in a time so short as to seem
indecent to the members of the personal family, the dead person
ceases to exist as an identifiable figure. To those individuals
in the community of good will and empathy, warmth and
compassion, only one of the key actors in the drama remains with
whom to commiserate—and that is always the criminal. The dead
person ceases to be a part of everyday reality, ceases to exist.
She is only a figure in a historic event. We inevitably turn
away from the past, toward the ongoing reality. And the ongoing
reality is the criminal; trapped, anxious, now helpless,
isolated, often badgered and bewildered. He usurps the
compassion that is justly his victim’s due. He will steal his
victim’s moral constituency along with her life.
Iranian revolution heats up on the 'Net - Lillian Swift (U.K.
Telegraph)
Iran is fighting a constant battle against dissenters who are
using the internet to voice criticism of the Islamic Republic
and to push for freedom and democracy. With the closure of
most independent newspapers and magazines in Iran, blogging -
publishing an online diary - has become a powerful tool in the
dissidents' arsenal by providing individuals with a public
voice. An Iranian blogger known as Saena, wrote recently:
"Weblogs are one weapon that even the Islamic Republic cannot
beat." There are an estimated 100,000 active blogs written
by Iranians both within the country and across the diaspora.
Persian ties with French as the second most common blogging
language after English.
|
Lying Leftie Loser Alert:
What if someone held a book-signing for a washed-up,
worthless little leftie loser whose 15-seconds of fame
evaporated long ago. . .and nobody came?
Hey,
everybody! It's none other than everyone's
favorite, dead-son-pimping, anti-American, neo-Commie,
Bush-hating, far extreme left-wing member of the
Dean-Moore-Soros Democratic Party, to remind us just how
much we've missed her, and how much we wished we could
have something to memorialize her eternal musings on
life, the universe. . .and everything else!
It's just too bad that
no one bothered to show up to get their own personalized
copy of Cindy-poo's little book: Not One More
Mother's Child - a. . .get this,
straight-to-paperback little tome that sports a photo
cover with a banner reading "Iraq Veterans Against the
War." Its listed on Amazon in 9,660th place in
sales. (What a triumph!)
While I know very little
about the "IVAW" one has to wonder how much in common it
may have with another alleged veteran-representing group
with similar initials: the VVAW - John Kerry's old
anti-American bunch, the Vietnam Veterans Against the
War, a commie-inspired, supported and directed group
that itself has much in common with the mainstay of
American anti-war organizations of the present day -
like Code Pink and International ANSWER - both commie
funded and supported. While it is likely that most
"average" American lefties who join such groups are
little aware of their origins, we all are responsible
for looking before we leap, and know with whom we
associate and whom we support.
That
NOMMC is a slap-dash of a publication is
self-evident by the
publisher's own web
site, and its explanation of how the book
came about. Koa Books explains that the basis for
the book was a very hastily scratched out
pamphlet (10,000 copies saddle stitched), written by
Greg Ruggiero from an interviewed conducted of Cindy
during a car ride from LaGuardia Airport to a press
conference. That pamphlet "blossomed" about six
weeks later into NOMMC, released on Veterans Day.
Cindy's book--which Koa Books claims had an "initial"
(only?) press run of 25,000--is Koa's first
"project," with three others noted on their site, all
dealing with spirituality--one of which is also
anti-war. Cindy is also reportedly "shopping" her
"memoirs" through an agent. Woo-hoo!
We can hardly wait.
While Cindy-Lou-Who
Sheehan may have had some measured amount of sympathy on
her side, oh say a year-and-a-half ago when her son,
Casey, died, she has long lost the right to that
sympathy. She started off by dishonoring
Casey's service to his country by insinuating--like all
those who cannot believe in a soldier's commitment,
patriotism and loyalty to his country--do, that Casey
must have just been another, misguided, stupid little
dupe who was tricked into the military by the
Bush-Rove-Halliburton-Cheney military industrial
complex. Never mind that at the time of his death,
Casey Sheehan was actually serving a "re-enlistment" of
his own choosing. Sheehan has now devoted her life
to the utter disgrace of Casey Sheehan's memory.
If for no other reason than he was able to rise above
such depraved upbringing, Casey Sheehan is to be
remembered fondly and thankfully, for his
accomplishments, not for his mother's despicable
activities.
More ==>
Free Republic |
Yahoo News |
Publishers Weekly |
more
|
Tancredo puts policy over party line - Anne C. Mulkern (Denver
Post)
U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo wants to inflame
people. He speaks on talk radio and cable television
as often as 15 times a week, warning that illegal immigrants
are stealing jobs, destroying American culture and killing
police officers. With every word, the ex-schoolteacher
son of Italian immigrants pours fuel on a grassroots brush
fire. Tancredo strives to agitate people enough that
they demand change from Congress. As outraged citizens
pressure lawmakers to follow Tancredo's lead, his power
grows.
Russ
Feingold: Hillary is "Republican lite" - Geoff Earle (New
York Post)
Sen. Russ Feingold fired a warning shot toward
Sen. Hillary Clinton and other Democrats who might run for
president on a centrist platform. "The Democrats need a
bold, progressive agenda that does not look they're trying to be
'Republican Lite,' " said Feingold, (D- Wis.), who is exploring
his own run for president. "That's what I believe will win
in 2008," he said, speaking on ABC's "This Week."
|
|
November 27, 2005
(top)
|
On Saddam's side: Former Attorney General Ramsey Clark (AP)
Iraqi police arrested eight Sunni Arabs in the northern city of
Kirkuk for allegedly plotting to assassinate the investigating
judge who prepared the case against Saddam Hussein, a senior
police commander said Sunday. The announcement came as former
U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark arrived in Baghdad, airport
officials said, apparently to aid in Saddam's defense.
Clark has been advising nearly a dozen international lawyers on
Saddam's defense team. He has contended that Saddam's rights
have been violated in the legal process following his capture.
But a U.S. government official close to the court said the
defense team had not filed the proper paperwork to have a
non-Iraqi lawyer in the courtroom.
Europeans funding terrorists in Iraq - David E. Kaplan (U.S.
News)
Who's funding the insurgents in Iraq? The list of suspects is
long: ex-Baathists, foreign jihadists, and angry Sunnis, to name
a few. Now add to that roster hard-core Euroleftists.
Turns out that far-left groups in western Europe are carrying on
a campaign dubbed Ten Euros for the Resistance, offering aid and
comfort to the car bombers, kidnappers, and snipers trying to
destabilize the fledgling Iraq government. In the words of one
Italian website, Iraq Libero (Free Iraq), the funds are meant
for those fighting the occupanti imperialisti. The groups
are an odd collection, made up largely of Marxists and Maoists,
sprinkled with an array of Arab emigres and aging, old-school
fascists, according to Lorenzo Vidino, an analyst on European
terrorism based at The Investigative Project in Washington, D.C.
Exit strategies: Victory or defeat - Mark Steyn (Jerusalem
Post)
Rumors of Abu Musad al-Zarqawi's death may be
exaggerated. He was reported by several Arab TV networks to have
been among eight terrorists who self-detonated in Mosul last
Sunday. Still, whether or not he's sleeping with the fishes or
the 72 virgins, he's already outlived whatever usefulness he had
to the jihad. Last Friday, the allegedly explosive "Arab
street" finally exploded, in the largest demonstration against
al-Qaida or its affiliates ever seen in the Middle East.
"Zarqawi," shouted 200,000 Jordanians, "from Amman we say to
you, you are a coward!" Also "the enemy of Allah" - which, for a
jihadist, isn't what they call on Broadway a money review.
The old head-hacker was sufficiently rattled by the critical
pans of his Jordanian hotel bombings that he issued the first
IRA-style apology in al-Qaida's history. "People of Jordan, we
did not undertake to blow up any wedding parties," he said. "For
those Muslims who were killed, we ask God to show them mercy,
for they were not targets."
Giving thanks to the soldier - Neil Cavuto (FOX News)
I
always wonder what Thanksgiving must be
like if you're not at home or not with your family.
If where you are it's not cozy, but rough
and dangerous. And the food
isn't incredible, more like institutional — meant well, but not
going down well. I always
wonder what Thanksgiving must be like if you're a soldier? Far
from home. Very far from cozy. Very, very far from even safe.
Gen. Vines: U.S. pullout would be "destabilizing" - Rowan
Scarborough (Washington Times)
The top tactical commander in Iraq says an abrupt pullout of
U.S. troops would be "destabilizing" and labeled "disturbing"
Washington's heated political debate that has some Democrats
calling the war unwinnable. Lt. Gen. John R. Vines, who
commands the Multinational Corps Iraq, said that 36 Iraqi
battalions, about one-third of the total force, are now
responsible for their own security sectors and can fight the
insurgency. But they are not yet ready to operate totally
independent of U.S. supply lines and tactical advice.
Because of that, he said, now is not the time for an American
withdrawal.
"Well-qualified" (highest) ABA rating likely for Alito -
Donna Cassata (AP)
The American Bar Association will grade Samuel Alito in the
coming weeks. Alito is likely to receive the same rating that he
did in 1990 when President Bush's father, George H.W. Bush,
nominated him to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals -
unanimous well-qualified, the highest rating. The ABA has
rated candidates since the 1950s on integrity, professional
competence and judicial temperament, a critical evaluation for
the Senate as it fulfills its advice and consent role.
While the ABA relies, in part, on the testimonials of
colleagues, an interview with the nominee and the assessment of
academics, two law school professors have come up with what they
believe is a more objective measure for judging judges.
Florida judge, Wayne Timmerman, favors female pedophile (FOX
News)
A Florida reading teacher charged with
having sex with a minor pleaded guilty on Tuesday to two counts
of lewd and lascivious behavior as part of a plea deal that does
not include any jail time. "I
accept full responsibility for my actions," Greco Middle School
teacher Debra Lafave, 25, said during Tuesday's trial in Tampa.
The deal provides that Lafave
will not serve any jail time in connection with multiple sex
acts with a 14-year-old student unless she violates the terms of
the plea agreement, which includes three years of house arrest
and seven years' probation.
|
|
November 26, 2005
(top)
|
What did the U.S. military know before 9/11? - James Rosen (Star
Tribune)
A top-secret military program set up six years ago to probe the
Al-Qaida terrorist network is provoking fierce new debate about
the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Military intelligence
officers and contractors who ran the clandestine mission, named
Able Danger, say that more than a year before the attacks, the
operation identified four of the plot's 19 hijackers and
produced a chart that fingered ringleader Mohamed Atta.
Those claims contradict findings of the 9/11 commission set up
by Congress. In its final report last year, the commission
spread wide blame for the attacks but concluded that none of the
hijackers, some of whom lived in the United States before Sept.
11, had been identified before the tragedy.
ACLU: Plaintiffs wanted - Lee Duigon (MensNewsDaily.com)
Six months ago, a senior at Jonesboro High School, Arkansas,
gave a graduation speech that included an invitation to audience
members to use the moment to accept Jesus Christ as Lord and
Savior. As you can well imagine, the ACLU of Arkansas has its
knickers in a twist. The ACLU is frothing at the mouth to
visit the Jonesboro school district with a hefty lawsuit,
probably to the tune of millions of local taxpayer dollars.
There's just one thing that stands in their way. They
can't find a plaintiff!
No hype needed; Saddam, al Qaeda linked - Victor Davis
Hanson (Honolulu Advertiser)
As American casualties mount in Iraq, politicians at home now
fight over who said what and when about weapons of mass
destruction and the need for going to war. One of the most
frequent charges is that President Bush hyped a non-existent
link between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida — and that as a result,
we diverted our efforts from finishing off the real terrorists
to start a new and costly war to replace a secular dictator.
This charge is false for several reasons — and illogical for
even more. Almost every responsible U.S. government body had
long warned about Saddam's links to al-Qaida terrorists. In
1998, for example, when the Clinton Justice Department indicted
bin Laden, the writ read: "In addition, al-Qaida reached an
understanding with the Government of Iraq that al-Qaida would
not work against that government and that on particular
projects, specifically including weapons development, al-Qaida
would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq."
Memo to Murtha - Cliff May (DefendDemocracy.org)
Before I say anything else, Congressman Murtha, let me thank you
-- for your long public service in Washington and, before that,
in Vietnam. And let me commend you, too, for sparking an
honest debate. Until now, what has passed for debate on Iraq has
been mostly slander – for example, calling President Bush a liar
and questioning his patriotism. Yes, questioning his patriotism:
because anyone who would lie to get America into a war for
reasons unrelated to national security would not be a patriot.
He'd be a traitor. I ask you, sir: Has such a vicious
charge ever before been leveled at an American president in a
time of war – or even a time of peace?
FOX News rejects factually inaccurate anti-Alito ad (AP)
Fox News is refusing to
air an ad critical of Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito, citing
its lawyers' contention that the spot is factually incorrect.
Fox News is refusing to air an ad critical of Supreme Court
nominee Samuel Alito, citing its lawyers' contention that the
spot is factually incorrect. The ad says that as an
appellate court judge, Alito has "ruled to make it easier for
corporations to discriminate ... even voted to approve strip
search of a 10-year-old girl." Referring to a document Alito
wrote in 1985 while seeking a job in the Reagan administration,
it quotes him as saying that "the Constitution does not protect
a right to an abortion."
|
|
November 25, 2005
(top)
|
Michael Jackson: Jews
are "leeches" - Noel Sheppard (NewsBusters.org)
ABC’s “Good Morning America” on Tuesday broke a story about
Michael Jackson that has received surprisingly little press. In
a report about the pop star’s finances, as well as his
relationship with financial advisors, an audiotape was played of
a telephone message Jackson left for a former business
associate. JACKSON: "They suck - they're like leeches. I'm
so tired of it. They start out the most popular person in the
world, make a lot of money, big house, cars, and everything, end
up with, penniless. It is conspiracy. The Jews do it on
purpose." On Wednesday, the Anti-Defamation League
officially demanded an apology from Jackson: "It is
important now for Mr. Jackson to stand up and acknowledge that
his words are hurtful and hateful. He needs to show his fans
that he rejects bigotry and is truly serious about stamping out,
in his words, 'the ugliness of racism, anti- Semitism and
stereotyping.' This can only begin with an apology to Jews
everywhere, especially those fans who have been deeply hurt and
offended by his words."
Mass. Attorney General to do battle against businesses daring to
open Sundays and holidays (AP)
Massachusetts'
attorney general is launching an investigation into several
supermarkets that stayed open opened on Thanksgiving in defiance
of the state's Puritan-era Blue Laws. The laws were passed
in the 1600s to keep colonists at home or in church on Sundays.
Parts of the laws, such as the ban on Sunday liquor sales, have
been repealed, but a prohibition on most stores doing business
on Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year's Day, has not.
"If these stores want to open, there's a way to do it: Change
the law," David Guano, a spokesman for Attorney General Thomas
F. Reilly, told The Boston Globe. The office didn't say what
sort of penalty the stores could face.
Political Correctness "Run-a-muck" Alert:
The good fools who run the City of Boston, have decided
that it is simply too scary a concept to call a
Christmas Tree a Christmas Tree, and are readying to
light the annual "Holiday Tree: --
Boston "holiday tree" stirs
controversy - Jason Szep (Reuters)
Boston set off a
furor this week when it officially renamed a giant
tree erected in a city park a "holiday tree" instead
of a "Christmas tree. The move drew an angry
response from Christian conservatives, including
evangelist Jerry Falwell who heckled Boston
officials and pressed the city to change the name
back. "There's been a concerted effort to
steal Christmas," Falwell told Fox Television.
The Nova Scotia logger who cut down the 48-foot
(14-meter) tree was indignant and said he would not
have donated the tree if he had known of the name
change. "I'd have cut it down and put it
through the chipper," Donnie Hatt told a Canadian
newspaper. "If they decide it should be a holiday
tree, I'll tell them to send it back. If it was a
holiday tree, you might as well put it up at
Easter."
|
Vermont high school teacher gives anti-Bush vocabulary quiz
(AP)
A high
school teacher is facing questions from administrators after
giving a vocabulary quiz that included digs at President
Bush and the extreme right. Bret Chenkin, a social
studies and English teacher at Mount Anthony Union High
School, said he gave the quiz to his students several months
ago. The quiz asked students to pick the proper words to
complete sentences. One example: "I wish Bush would be
(coherent, eschewed) for once during a speech, but there are
theories that his everyday diction charms the below-average
mind, hence insuring him Republican votes." "Coherent" is
the right answer.
How private health care is crminalized in Canada - Steve
Lambert (Canadian Press)
A showdown over private health care is looming in Manitoba,
where the NDP government is threatening to impose sanctions
against the Maples Surgical Centre over its plans for a private
magnetic resonance imaging machine. Health Minister Tim
Sale, who said Tuesday he would wait for federal direction on
the issue, changed his mind Wednesday and said the clinic will
contravene the Canada Health Act if it charges patients for
medically necessary diagnostic scans. "If it's medically
necessary, then the provider cannot charge the patient," Sale
said. Sale said the province is willing to enforce the
Canada Health Act with fines of up to $5,000 and more serious
sanctions for subsequent offences.
Al Qaeda devastated by recent U.S. offensive (NewsMax.com)
The U.S. military's recent
offensive in western Iraq has had a devastating impact on the
al-Qaida-backed insurgency, with coalition forces killing over
700 terrorists and capturing 1,500 in the last two months alone.
"It's been very successful," Maj. Gen. Rick Lynch told a
briefing in Baghdad on Wednesday, referring to a series of
security offensives conducted by U.S. and Iraq forces in Anbar
province since September 28. Though media reports suggest
recent U.S. casualties are due to deteriorating security
conditions in Iraq as a whole, most were incurred during the new
offensive - dubbed "Operation Steel Curtain."
Ohio imam to be deported for terrorist ties (AP)
Federal authorities arrested an Islamic
religious leader Friday as they began the process of deporting
him for lying about ties to terrorist groups. Imam Fawaz
Damra, the spiritual leader of Ohio's largest mosque, was
convicted in June 2004 of concealing ties to three groups that
the U.S. government classifies as terrorist organizations when
he applied for U.S. citizenship in 1994. That conviction
was upheld in March, clearing the way for U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement to begin deportation proceedings.
Damra, 44, was arrested early Friday without incident, the
immigration office said.
N.Y. judge to decide if spousal immunity applicable to same-sex
couples (AP)
A gay man charged with helping his lover loot a wealthy school
district has asked a judge to rule that state law protecting
spouses from having to testify against each other also applies
to same-sex partners. Stephen Signorelli,
fighting charges that he stole at least
$219,000 from the Roslyn, N.Y., school district, is seeking to
bar testimony by his longtime companion, Frank Tassone, the
district's former superintenden.
Auditors say that in all, $11.2 million
was taken from the Long Island district, and state Comptroller
Alan Hevesi has called the case "the largest, most remarkable,
most extraordinary theft" from a school system in American
history. Tassone pleaded guilty
this year to stealing $1 million between 1996 and 2002. As part
of his plea bargain, he agreed to testify against other
defendants in the case, which meant he might have to take the
stand in Signorelli's trial.
Three Mass. Democrat Congressmen try to weasal out of '02 war
vote (AP)
Three years ago, Massachusetts
congressmen Martin Meehan, Stephen Lynch and Edward Markey
bucked their state Democratic colleagues and cast votes to give
President Bush a green light to go to war in Iraq. Since
then, the three have renounced their votes and emerged as
critics of the way Bush has handled the war.
|
|
November 24, 2005
(top)
|
The left hate inequality, not evil - Dennis Prager (TownHall.com)
If you want to understand the Left, most of what you need to
know can be summarized thus: The Left hates inequality, not
evil. As one raised as a New York Jew (who, moreover,
attended an Ivy League university) and therefore liberal -- it
took me a while to recognize this fatal moral characteristic of
the Left. But the moment I realized it, it became immoral not to
oppose leftist values. It is neither possible nor virtuous
to be devoid of hatred. Even those who think it is always wrong
to hate must hate hatred. The question therefore is not whether
one hates but what (or whom) one hates.
The "extremism" of Judge Sam Alioto - Larry Elder (TownHall.com)
"Extreme: the most remote in any direction; outermost or
farthest: the extreme edge of the field." (American Heritage
Dictionary) Judge Samuel Alito, President Bush's nominee to the
Supreme Court, applied for a promotion while working in the
Reagan administration. His 1985 application read, in part: "I am
particularly proud of my contributions in recent cases in which
the government has argued in the Supreme Court that racial and
ethnic quotas should not be allowed and that the Constitution
does not protect a right to an abortion." Sen. Ted
Kennedy, D-Mass., a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee,
immediately pounced. These "extreme statements," said Kennedy,
were "deeply troubling." Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., said
the application raised questions about Alito's "ideological"
position. The New York Times followed up with an obligatory
editorial also denouncing as "extreme" Alito's assertion that
"the Constitution does not protect the right to an abortion."
When did opposition to quotas become "extreme"?
"Dirty bomber" Padilla indicted (FOX News/AP)
"Dirty bomb" suspect Jose Padilla has
been indicted by a Miami federal grand jury on criminal charges
that he conspired to "murder, kidnap and maim" people overseas.
The indicment naming Padilla and
four others was unsealed Tuesday and returned by a grand jury
last Thursday. While the charges allege Padilla was part of a
U.S.-based terrorism conspiracy, they do not include the
government's earlier allegations that he planned to carry out
attacks in America. "We believe it
is the appropriate thing to do," Attorney General Alberto
Gonzales said during a news conference in Washington Tuesday
when announcing the charges.
|
|
November 23, 2005
(top)
|
Looney
N.J. college prof. quits
(SeanRobins.com)
Adjunct professor John Daly, whose e-mail to a college
freshman--in which he urged soldiers in Iraq to "turn their guns
on their superiors"--ignited a fierce but brief firestorm at
Warren County Community College, apparently has little stomach
to fight for his own convictions, and, less than 24 hours after
the college's Board of Trustees announced that it would meet
today to consider what action if any would be taken, has
resigned. Instead of meeting this evening to consider
Daly's vituperative e-mail, it quickly voted to accept Daly's
resignation. WCCC's President, William Austin, issued the
following statement:
I firmly believe that the most precious freedom all Americans share is the First
Amendment right of freedom of speech. I am committed to working unceasingly to
see that it is preserved for all WCCC students, faculty and staff.
At the same time, there are existing state laws — as well as College policies
and procedures — that must be followed to ensure that all members of our College
are free and encouraged to exercise their right to free speech without fear of
intimidation or retaliation. I am dedicated to protecting and preserving that
freedom.
The recent dispute between two members of our College community — Adjunct
Instructor John Daly and a student representing a new student club — speaks
clearly to the complexity of addressing these issues in these difficult and
controversial times.
Late today, the Board was informed of Mr. Daly’s decision to resign his Adjunct
position at WCCC effective immediately. In its meeting, the Board voted to
accept the resignation agreement and instructed the administration to make
certain that students in Mr. Daly’s class are offered the highest quality
instruction in this interim period.
We have already moved ahead in finding a very able member of our faculty to
conduct the remainder of Mr. Daly’s classes for this semester. We will also
rededicate ourselves to a review of our current policies and procedures to make
certain that we continue to foster an open and collegial learning environment at
our institution. I personally pledge to see that tolerance training is included
in our next faculty and staff in-service, and to consider a broad range of
student input in its development
College Board Chairman,
Edward Smith, added the following in a second statement:
At the request of Warren
County Community College President, Dr. William Austin, the
College’s Board of Trustees met tonight to review available
facts concerning a recent dispute between an adjunct
instructor at the College, Mr. John Daly, and a WCCC student
and certain safety concerns that arose as a result thereof.
The dispute revolved around, among other things, comments
made in an e-mail from the instructor to the student who was
representing a new student organization and other facts and
circumstances that came to the Board’s attention subsequent
thereto.
Tonight’s meeting of the
Board was initially called to consider what if any action
would be taken. As we prepared for that meeting, we
received word from Mr. Daly that he had tendered his
resignation from WCCC effective immediately. The Board has
accepted his resignation.
Chris Matthews: Terrorists are "not evil, they just have a
different perspective" (Edmonton Sun)
Years after 9-11 and the "crazy Zeitgeist" that permeated the
United States, Americans have still not learned to know their
enemies instead of just hating them, said American political
journalist Chris Matthews yesterday. In a speech to
political science students at the University of Toronto, the
host of the CNBC current affairs show Hardball had plenty of
harsh words for U.S. President George W. Bush, as well as the
political climate that has characterized his country for the
last few years. "The period between 9-11 and (invading)
Iraq was not a good time for America. There wasn't a robust
discussion of what we were doing," Matthews said."If we stop
trying to figure out the other side, we've given up. The person
on the other side is not evil. They just have a different
perspective."
|
LYING JOURNALIST AWARD:
CNN anchor, Jack Cafferty "reporting" on comments
made by Dick Cheney in an address on Monday:
Perhaps it was
just his confusion from watching Vice President Cheney's
Monday address
on his own network--and maybe giggling over the way the
Veep's head was being "X-ed" out.. Or maybe
Cafferty is just one of those lying Liberal liars who
just can't see past their Bush-bashing, conservative
hatred long enough to know what is the truth.
In yesterday's
4 p.m. edition of CNN's
Situation Room,
Cafferty decided that a lie is better than the truth any
day. . .so long as it helps your cause:
The
Lie: JACK CAFFERTY (Situation Room):
It's getting ugly out there. According to Vice
President Cheney, if you question, if you dare
question the use of pre-war intelligence, according
to that speech this morning, you are dishonest and
reprehensible.
The
Truth: V.P. DICK CHENEY (American
Enterprise Institute address): My remarks
today concern national security, in particular the
war on terror and the Iraq front in that war.
Several days ago, I commented briefly on some recent
statements that have been made by some members of
Congress about Iraq. Within hours of my speech, a
report went out on the wires under the headline,
"Cheney says war critics
'dishonest,' 'reprehensible.'" One
thing I've learned in the last five years is that
when you're Vice President, you're lucky if your
speeches get any attention at all. But I do have a
quarrel with that headline, and it's important to
make this point at the outset.
I do not believe it is wrong
to criticize the war on terror or any aspect
thereof. Disagreement, argument, and debate
are the essence of democracy, and none of us should
want it any other way.
If Mr. Cafferty
had the slightest interest in the facts and the truth,
he would have actually read or listended to Cheney's
speech, and known that Cheney never said that war
critics--or as Cafferty puts it, those who question the
use of pre-war intelligence--"are dishonest and
reprehensible." Without any question, Cheney said
that a wire service report had the erroneous headline
"Cheney says war critics 'dishonest,' 'reprehensible.'"
In the very speech to which Cafferty refers, Cheney says
the dead opposite: "I do not believe it is wrong to
criticise the war on terror or any aspect thereof."
And Cheney's
criticism of the wire service headline is right on the
money. The headline referred to an
address
made by Cheney on November 16, 2005, at the Frontiers of
Freedom Institute 2005 Ronald Reagan Gala. Rather
than characterizing war critics as the headline suggests
(or "those who question the use of pre-war
intelligence," as McCafferty's lie goes), Cheney was
being critical of charges being made by U.S.
Senators that the President deliberately misled on
pre-war intelligence. Cheney's comments, in their
fuller context follow:
Most of you know, I
have spent a lot of years in public service, and
first came to work in Washington back in the late
1960s. I know what it’s like to operate in a highly
charged political environment, in which the players
on all sides of an issue feel passionately and speak
forcefully. In such an environment people sometimes
lose their cool, and yet in Washington you can
ordinarily rely on some basic measure of
truthfulness and good faith in the conduct of
political debate. But in the last several weeks we
have seen a wild departure from that tradition. And
the suggestion
that’s been made by some U.S. senators that the
President of the United States or any member of this
administration purposely misled the American people
on pre-war intelligence is
one of the most dishonest and reprehensible charges
ever aired in this city.
What we’re hearing
now is some politicians contradicting their own
statements and making a play for political advantage
in the middle of a war. The saddest part is that our
people in uniform have been subjected to these
cynical and pernicious falsehoods day in and day
out. American soldiers and Marines are out there
every day in dangerous conditions and desert
temperatures –- conducting raids, training Iraqi
forces, countering attacks, seizing weapons, and
capturing killers –- and back home a few
opportunists are suggesting they were sent into
battle for a lie.
The President and I
cannot prevent certain politicians from losing their
memory, or their backbone -– but we’re not going to
sit by and let them rewrite history.
|
Just a "bug" in the system, CNN insists (Reuters)
CNN apologized on Tuesday and offered a rare explanation
from its control booth for a technical glitch many viewers
failed to notice -- a large "X" the network flashed over
Vice President Dick Cheney's face. The wayward
graphic, which CNN said lasted for about one-seventh of a
second, appeared during the network's live coverage of
Cheney's speech on Monday addressing critics of the Bush
administration's conduct of the war in Iraq. Word of
the snafu quickly surfaced on the Internet, including still
photos of the image posted by online columnist Matt Drudge,
along with a story suggesting that some who saw the
momentary "X" thought it might have been deliberate.
More ==>
DrudgeReport
|
|
November 22, 2005
(top)
|
Arab-American guilty in al-Qaeda assasination plot - Matthew
Barakat (AP)
An
Arab-American college student was convicted Tuesday of joining
al- Qaida and plotting to assassinate President Bush. The
federal jury rejected Ahmed Omar Abu Ali's claim that Saudi
authorities whipped and tortured him to extract a false
confession. Abu Ali, a 24-year-old U.S. citizen born to a
Jordanian father and raised in Falls Church, Va., could get life
in prison on charges that included conspiracy to assassinate the
president, conspiracy to hijack aircraft and providing support
to al-Qaida. The jury deliberated for 2 1/2 days. Abu Ali
swallowed hard before the verdict was read but otherwise showed
little emotion. He did not testify at his trial.
N.J. college prof who called for soldiers to kill their
superiors may be canned (WorldNetDaily.com)
A New Jersey college's board of trustees has called for an
emergency meeting tonight to discuss how to handle the
controversy surrounding an e-mail by a professor suggesting
soldiers in Iraq should kill their superior officers. As
WorldNetDaily reported, the e-mail by adjunct English instructor
John Daly of Warren County Community College was a reply to
freshman Rebecca Beach for her announcement of a campus program
last Thursday featuring decorated Iraq war hero Lt. Col. Scott
Rutter. Daly wrote: "Real freedom will come when soldiers
in Iraq turn their guns on their superiors. Daly said
Sunday he was worried he would be fired tonight and already had
been told not to show up for the three classes he was scheduled
to teach today, according to Inside Higher Ed, an online news
source.
Prof. John Daly's e-mail to Warren County Community College
student, Rebecca Beach: (SeanRobins.com)
I am asking my students to
boycott your event. I am also going to ask others to boycott
it. Your literature and signs in the entrance lobby look
like fascist propaganda and is extremely offensive. Your
main poster "Communism killed 100,000,000" is not only
untrue, but ignores the fact that CAPITALISM has killed many
more and the evidence for that can be seen in the daily news
papers. The U.S. government can fly to dominate the people
of Iraq in 12 hours, yet it took them five days to assist
the people devastated by huricane Katrina. Racism and
profits were key to their priorities. Exxon, by the way,
made $9 Billion in profits this last quarter--their highest
proft margin ever. Thanks to the students of WCCC and other
poor and working class people who are recruited to fight and
die for EXXON and other corporations who earning megaprofits
from their imperialist plunders. If you want to count the
number of deaths based on political systems, you can begin
with the more than a million children who have died in Iraq
from U.S.-imposed sanctions and war. Or the million African
American people who died from lack of access to healthcare
in the US over the last 10 years.
I will continue to expose your
right-wing, anti-people politics until groups like your
won't dare show their face on a college campus. Real freedom
will come when soldiers in Iraq turn their guns on their
superiors and fight for just causes and for people's
needs--such freedom fighters can be counted throughout
American history and they certainly will be counted again.
Warren County Community College's Board of
Trustees is currently considering whether Prof. Daly will continue in his
position. Those interested in contributing to the "dialog"
with Prof. Daly, may reach him via e-mail at:
jpdalyca@yahoo.com.
|
|
November 21, 2005
(top)
|
CNN
"covers" Cheney: "X" marks the Vice President
(SeanRobins.com)
As first reported this evening on the
Drudge Report,
during its live coverage this morning of an 11:00
address from the
American Enterprise
Institute, CNN superimposed a large
black "X" mark upon the head Vice President Dick Cheney,
as the caption quoted Cheney as stating that "I do not
believe it is wrong to criticize." Drudge reports
that the "X" appeared repeatedly, for a fraction of a
second each time.
Cheney was in
the midst of a
detailed discussion
of the current barrage of media and poltical attacks
being lobbed at the war effort, the administration and
the President. At about the time CNN chose
to "mar" Cheney's appearance, he was stating:
My remarks today concern
national security, in particular the war on terror
and the Iraq front in that war. Several days ago, I
commented briefly on some recent statements that
have been made by some members of Congress about
Iraq. Within hours of my speech, a report went out
on the wires under the headline, “Cheney says war
critics ‘dishonest,’ ‘reprehensible.'"
One thing I’ve learned in the
last five years is that when you’re Vice President,
you’re lucky if your speeches get any attention at
all. But I do have a quarrel with that headline,
and it’s important to make this point at the
outset. I do not believe it is wrong to criticize
the war on terror or any aspect thereof.
Disagreement, argument, and debate are the essence
of democracy, and none of us should want it any
other way. For my part, I’ve spent a career in
public service, run for office eight times -- six
statewide offices and twice nationally. I served in
the House of Representatives for better than a
decade, most of that time as a member of the
leadership of the minority party. To me, energetic
debate on issues facing our country is more than
just a sign of a healthy political system -- it’s
also something I enjoy. It’s one of the reasons
I’ve stayed in this business. And I believe the
feeling is probably the same for most of us in
public life. * * *
What is not legitimate -- and
what I will again say is dishonest and reprehensible
-- is the suggestion by some U. S. senators that the
President of the United States or any member of his
administration purposely misled the American people
on pre-war intelligence.
Some of the most
irresponsible comments have come from politicians
who actually voted in favor of authorizing the use
of force against Saddam Hussein. These are elected
officials who had access to the intelligence
materials. They are known to have a high opinion of
their own analytical capabilities. (Laughter.) And
they were free to reach their own judgments based
upon the evidence. They concluded, as the President
and I had concluded, and as the previous
administration had concluded, that Saddam Hussein
was a threat. Available intelligence indicated that
the dictator of Iraq had weapons of mass
destruction, and this judgment was shared by the
intelligence agencies of many other nations,
according to the bipartisan Silberman-Robb
Commission. All of us understood, as well, that for
more than a decade, the U.N. Security Council had
demanded that Saddam Hussein make a full accounting
of his weapons programs. The burden of proof was
entirely on the dictator of Iraq -- not on the U.N.
or the United States or anyone else. And he
repeatedly refused to comply throughout the course
of the decade.
The lack of
impartiality and journalistic integrity on the part of
the mainstream media is well-documented and understood,
but the levels of partisan, leftist rancor to which
outlets such as CNN are even yet capable of
sinking, can still be astonishing. Not even the
pretense of professionalism remains when the media
sinks so low as to employ such cheap, second grade
tactics as X-ing out the head of the Vice President of
the United States of America. On a live, national
broadcast.
Appearing on
Monday's evening's Hannity & Colmes, Matt Drudge,
who first discovered the "subliminal" "X" imposed over
the V.P., commented: "This is the vice president of the
United STates. It is rather serious to be putting
black 'Xs' over his face. . . . I felt it rather
alarming that this is subliminally being sent out over
the airwaves. . . . I'm just knocked out."
After refusing
comment for several hours, CNN issued the following
statement as its fairly improbable explanation:
"Upon
seeing this unfortunate but very brief graphic, CNN
senior management immediately investigated. We concluded
this was a technological malfunction, not an issue of
operator error. A portion of the switcher experienced a
momentary glitch. We obviously regret that it happened
and are working on the equipment to ensure it is not
repeated." |
Cheney: Iraq withdrawal would cause "dangerous illusion" (AFP)
US Vice
President Dick Cheney launched a blistering new attack on
critics of the Iraq war, saying withdrawing troops would cause a
"dangerous illusion." He also said senators and others now
accusing President George W. Bush of misleading Americans into
war were guilty of "revisionism of the most corrupt and
shameless variety." A respected Democratic congressman
called last week for the 160,000 US troops in Iraq to be brought
out, but Cheney said: "It is a dangerous illusion to suppose
that another retreat by the civilized world would satisfy the
appetite of the terrorists and get them to leave us alone."
DeLay's lawyer to argue this week actions alleged were not
crimes in 2002 - R.G. Ratcliffe (Houston Chronicle)
U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay returns to court this week for a pivotal
hearing that could lead to the dismissal of the case against him
on felony charges of violating state election and
money-laundering laws. The core issue before visiting
Judge Pat Priest on Tuesday will be whether the crimes DeLay is
accused of committing were actually crimes in 2002 when they
allegedly occurred. DeLay and his co-defendants — Jim Ellis and
John Colyandro — have proclaimed their innocence and are asking
Priest to throw out the case. "This could be the end of
the case. Frankly, there's no crime charged and the law is on
our side," said DeLay lawyer Dick DeGuerin of Houston.
GOP targeting Ted Kennedy's Senate seat in '06 - Michael
Levenson (Boston Globe)
Last week, he introduced himself to 15 Republicans at Reading
Public Library, 20 at ParkView Specialty Hospital in
Springfield, and 12 assembled over slices at Caruso Pizza in
Melrose. Thursday brought a welcome treat: 100 Republicans in a
ballroom in Pittsfield, rapt and ready for his pitch. No
crowd is too small, no event too far-flung for Kevin P. Scott,
Wakefield Republican on a mission. The former selectman and
member of the town Board of Public Works has been barnstorming
the state hoping to be more David than Don Quixote. Despite the
odds, he wants to unseat US Senator Edward M. Kennedy.
|
|
November 20, 2005
(top)
|
Abandoning Iraq: Does Rep. Murtha understand the consequences of
immediate withdrawal from Iraq? - Robert Kagan & William
Kristol (Weekly Standard)
Rep. Jack Murtha has had a distinguished congressional career.
But his outburst last Thursday was breathtakingly irresponsible.
Nowhere in his angry and emotional call for the immediate
withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq did the Pennsylvania
Democrat bother to ask, much less answer, the most serious
questions his proposal raises. What would be the likely outcome
in Iraq if the United States pulled out? Does Murtha actually
believe the Iraqi people could fight the al Qaeda terrorists and
Saddam Hussein loyalists by themselves once American forces
left? He does not say. In fact, he knows perfectly well that the
Iraqi people are not yet capable of defending themselves against
the monsters in their midst and that, therefore, a U.S.
withdrawal would likely lead to carnage on a scale that would
dwarf what is now occurring in Iraq.
Johnny Depp: France no longer such a great place to hide (ContactMusic.com)
Hollywood star Johnny Depp is so shocked by the riots raging
through France, he's considering abandoning his home in the
country. The Finding Neverland heart-throb moved to Europe
when life in Los Angeles became too violent. He has since
divided time between two continents - but he fears France will
be scarred permanently by the current troubles.
|
|
November 19, 2005
(top)
|
"Cut
and Run" Resolution goes down in flames
(SeanRobins.com)
After fiery debate,
including a near fist-fight or two--which included the baptism
by first of neophyte Congresswoman, Jean Schmidt (R-OH) who
dared voice the obvious criticism of Murtha's efforts--the
House voted late last evening on H.Res. 571, which would have
stated the "sense" of the House of Representatives being that
the United States should immediately withdraw its troops from
Iraq. Well, as it turned out, by a whopping 403-3 vote,
that wasn't the "sense" of the U.S. House. Though
the resolution by its very nature was non-binding, it can be
viewed as a victory for President Bush, and at least a partial
Congressional reaffirmation of the war in Iraq. Even
Murtha--like Charlile Rangel and his 2004 bill to reinstate the
draft--voted against his own resolution. (Ironically,
Murtha was one of only two who voted for Rangel's draft
reinstatement.) Last night, only Reps. McKinney, Serrano
and Wexler--all Democrats--voted in favor of the
cut-and-run resolution. More ==>
See vote
tally on H. Res. 571 | (AP)
Vatican: Intelligent design not science. . .it's religion -
Nicole Winfield (AP)
The Vatican's
chief astronomer said Friday that "intelligent design" isn't
science and doesn't belong in science classrooms, the latest
high-ranking Roman Catholic official to enter the evolution
debate in the United States. The Rev. George Coyne, the
Jesuit director of the Vatican Observatory, said placing
intelligent design theory alongside that of evolution in school
programs was "wrong" and was akin to mixing apples with oranges.
"Intelligent design isn't science even though it pretends to
be," the ANSA news agency quoted Coyne as saying on the
sidelines of a conference in Florence. "If you want to teach it
in schools, intelligent design should be taught when religion or
cultural history is taught, not science."
Half of all Americans OK with use of torture in war on terror
(NewsMax.com)
Nearly half of all Americans think
torturing terror suspects to gain information can be justified,
according to a new survey, reports the Washington Times.
The survey, by the Pew Research Center for the People & the
Press by, of 2,006 persons found that 46 percent thought
torturing terrorists to gain important information was sometimes
(31 percent) or often (15 percent) justified; 17 percent thought
it was rarely justified; and 32 percent were opposed. By
contrast, the study found that of 520 opinion leaders questioned
on the issue, no more than one in four thinks that torture of
terrorist suspects can be sometimes or often justified, Agence
France-Presse reports.
Vietnam flashbacks: The hottest front in the Iraq war is now in
Washington - Fred Barnes (Weekly Standard)
Many have forgotten how the United States lost in Vietnam, but
not former Defense Secretary Melvin Laird. When the last
American military unit was withdrawn in 1973, the Viet Cong had
been defeated and the North Vietnamese army checkmated. For the
next two years, "South Vietnam held its own courageously and
respectably against a better-bankrolled enemy," Laird writes in
the current Foreign Affairs. "Given enough outside
resources, South Vietnam was capable of defending itself."
Instead, "we grabbed defeat from the jaws of victory [in 1975]
when Congress cut off the funding for South Vietnam that had
allowed it to continue to fight on its own. . . . Without U.S.
funding, South Vietnam was quickly overrun." It was a stunning
and unnecessary defeat for America and for a free Vietnam. And
the lesson is clear: A war can be won on the ground overseas and
lost in Washington.
Springsteen: Not "Born to Run" says U.S. Senate (NewsMax.com)
Bruce Springsteen famously was "born in the USA," but he's
getting scorned in the U.S. Senate. An effort by New
Jersey's two Democratic senators to honor the veteran rocker was
shot down Friday by Republicans who are apparently still miffed
a year after the Boss lent his voice to the campaign of
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry.
|
|
November 18, 2005
(top)
|
House
votes to force vote on Murtha "cut and run" resolution
(SeanRobins.com)
In a move of political
brilliance, House Republicans today acted to force a quick vote
on the "Murtha" Resolution--so-called for the resolution's
sponsor, Rep. John Murtha (D-PA), which calls for the immediate
withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq. This evening, by a
vote of 210-202 (with 5 Republicans voting against), the House
passed a procedural resolution, H.Res. 572, which provides for a
vote on H.Res. 571 and H. Con.Res. 308, which constitute the
"Murtha" Resolution.
Rep. Murtha, in the past 24 or
so hours, has become the latest media "starlet" of the
Democratic Party, garnering enthusiastic support of the media
and the rabid kook elements of the party. As a further
demonstration of its lack of objectivity, and its obvious far
left leanings, the mainstream media has cast Murtha as a rare
hawkish Democrat, whose views on Iraq are particularly
significant in view of his ardent, long-running support for the
war. According to the media, and others signing Murtha's
praise as the Democrats' heir apparent to the John Kerry "war
hero" throne, Murtha has staunchly supported the war, and his
recent turnabout in position must mean that things are really
going badly. The stuff of such rhetoric is amazingly
similar to a whitish substance that is often found littering the
floor in a chicken coop.
Far from being a hawk, Murtha
has on several occasions since before Congress voted in
October, 2002 to give the President the authorization to go to
war in Iraq, spoken out forcefully against U.S. military action,
and in 2003 and 2004, declared that the war effort in
Iraq had failed. The U.S. mainstream media, however, has
conveniently omitted any reference to Murtha's real positions on
the war in its coverage of his actions yesterday and today.
At one point in this evening's
particularly acrimonious debate, Rep. Jean Schmidt (R-OH),
relayed the comments of a Marine colonel, who serves in the Ohio
legislature: "He asked me to send Congress a message," said
Schmidt. "Stay the course. He also asked me to send
Congressman Murtha a message - that cowards cut and run, Marines
never do."
Ironically, Democrats opposed
the initial vote to bring Murtha's bill to a vote, because they
know all too well that their votes--yea or nay--are a losing
proposition. "Yes" votes by Democrats are an endorsement
of Murtha's cut-and-run strategy, and will be viewed, rightly
so, by Americans as calling for U.S. surrender in Iraq.
"No" votes by Democrats on the other hand, will be roundly
condemned by the lunatic far left fringe, which has all but
completely overtaken the power base of the Party, and will
subject Democratic opponents of cut-and-run to ceaseless attack
from within.
In a move which, in saner times
would be viewed as unbelievably bizarre, House Democratic
leadership condemned as partisan trickery, efforts by the
majority to place House members views as to Iraq policy on the
record. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) called the move to bring
Murtha's resolution to a vote "disgraceful." Steny Hoyer
(D-MD), the 2nd-ranking Democrat in the House, declared the vote
"the rankest of politics and the absence of any sense of shame."
The House completed its procedural vote and began debating the
Murtha Resolution at 9:50 p.m.
The open question at that hour
is: Will Murtha vote for or against his own
resolution? He may want to check with Charlie Rangel about
how he voted last year on his own bill to reactivate the
draft.
At it again? Wash Post's
Dana Priest reveals "secret Counterterrorist Intelligence
Centers"
(SeanRobins.com)
In what seems to be an
ongoing theme, the same Washington Post reporter, Dana
Priest, who on November 2nd, blew the cover off of a covert CIA
prison system, has now done the same thing for
"counterintelligence centers" established by the Agengy in "more
than two dozen countries where U.S. and foreign inteligence
officers work side by side to track and capture suspected
terrorists and to destroy or penetrate their networks,. . ."
Ms. Priest's prior (Nov. 2nd) leak has drawn sharp criticism,
and calls for Congressional and criminal probes. Today's
leak should likewise be closely scrutinized, as the Post
and Ms. Priest continue to show disdain for the sanctity of
classified operations vital to our national security.
|
The CIA has established joint operation centers in
more than two dozen countries where U.S. and foreign
intelligence officers work side by side to track and
capture suspected terrorists and to destroy or
penetrate their networks, according to current and
former American and foreign intelligence officials.
The secret Counterterrorist Intelligence Centers are
financed mostly by the agency and employ some of the
best espionage technology the CIA has to offer,
including secure communications gear, computers
linked to the CIA's central databases, and access to
highly classified intercepts once shared only with
the nation's closest Western allies. The
Americans and their counterparts at the centers,
known as CTICs, make daily decisions on when and how
to apprehend suspects, whether to whisk them off to
other countries for interrogation and detention, and
how to disrupt al Qaeda's logistical and financial
support.
More--> |
Senate Iraq War timetable amendment defeated - Bill Sammon (Washington
Times)
President Bush said yesterday that it was "a positive step" for
the Senate to defeat a Democrat-led effort to establish a
timetable for withdrawing troops from Iraq. "The Senate,
in a bipartisan fashion, rejected an amendment that would have
taken our troops out of Iraq before the mission was complete,"
Mr. Bush said during a press conference in Kyoto with Japanese
Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi. "To me, that was a positive
step by the United States Senate." Mr. Bush rejected a
reporter's suggestion that he was embarrassed by the Senate's
subsequent approval of a watered-down measure that requires the
White House to give lawmakers regular progress reports on Iraq.
Jimmy Carter's dimentia on-the-move: Praises own presidency
- Ben Johnson (FrontPageMagazine.com)
The only thing more
painful than listening to Jimmy Carter lecture President Bush on
how to conduct a successful presidency was living through his
disastrous attempt to turn his advice into reality. As I
noted earlier this week,
Carter has channeled his
hatred of non-leftists, secular and religious, into a glut of
slanders in his new bestseller, Our Endangered Values. He
charges his opponents with, among other things, countenancing
female circumcision, defending the murder of federal judges,
torturing innocent Islamofascists, and forcing North Korea to
manufacture nuclear weapons. Jimmy once again offers himself as
the nation’s savior-by-acclamation, leading his errant people,
like a latter-day Moses, to the Promised Land. Every time he
flashes his toothy grin before an adoring interviewer, the
American people should ask why they should listen to anything he
has to say. Jimmy Carter’s presidency could be summed up by a
Billy Joel couplet: “Ayatollahs in Iran/Russians in
Afghanistan.” However, this would omit so much: “malaise,” the
misery index, soaring interest rates, a “helpless giant” foreign
policy, stagflation, gas lines, record deficits, and killer
jackrabbits. The former president doesn’t ignore his record in
his book; he lies about it.
House bill would end "catch and release" policy for illegals
- Stephen Dinan (Washington Times)
The House Homeland Security Committee yesterday passed a border
security bill that would expand expedited removal of illegal
aliens across all U.S. land borders and boost funding for border
enforcement and detention. "Expedited removal" is an
attempt to speed up the processing and return of illegal aliens
to their home countries, which takes about 90 days under the old
system, but has been cut to about 30 days under a limited
Department of Homeland Security pilot program. The program
allows immigration authorities more discretion to deport someone
without a set of hearings, and cuts down on processing time for
other countries to take back their citizens. The bill,
which passed by voice vote, also would penalize countries that
refuse to take back illegal aliens and would end the current
"catch-and-release" policy. Under that policy the Department of
Homeland Security processes so-called OTMs, or "other than
Mexicans," and then releases most of them into society with the
hope -- usually dashed -- they would return in order to be
deported.
|
|
November 17, 2005
(top)
|
Withdraw the Libby indictment (Washington Times)
Bob Woodward's just-released statement, suggesting that on June
27, 2003, he may have been the reporter who told Scooter Libby
about Joseph Wilson's wife, blew a gigantic hole in Patrick
Fitzgerald's recently unveiled indictment of the vice
president's former chief of staff. While that indictment
did not charge Mr. Libby with outing a CIA covert operative, it
alleged that he lied to investigators and the grand jury. As we
have stated earlier on this page -- and unlike many conservative
voices then -- we believe perjury is always a serious offense
(even in a political setting). And if sufficient evidence exists
to support a conviction, then Mr. Fitzgerald's indictment of Mr.
Libby was fully warranted. However, the heart of his
perjury theory was predicated upon the proposition that Mr.
Libby learned of Valerie Plame's identity from other government
officials and not from NBC's Tim Russert, as claimed by Mr.
Libby. Indeed, Mr. Fitzgerald seemed to have a reasonable case
because Mr. Russert, a respected and admired journalist, with no
vested interest of his own, denied that he discussed the Mr.
Wilson's matter with Mr. Libby.
House denounces (320-91) Ninth Circuit decision in parental
rights case - Lisa Friedman (L.A. Daily News)
Lawmakers in the U.S. House
overwhelmingly denounced the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
on Wednesday for tossing out a lawsuit by Palmdale parents
furious that their children were surveyed at school about sex.
In a 320-91 vote, legislators passed a resolution demanding the
court rehear the case and charging that it "declared parenting
unconstitutional" when it rejected last month the Mesquite
Elementary School parents' claim that they have the exclusive
right to tell their children about sex. The measure
carries no enforcement or legal weight but is the latest in a
string of congressional attacks on the 9th Circuit Court as the
House nears a vote on a budget bill that may include a provision
that would split the court. The Senate is expected to oppose
that move.
Over 200 House members demand Able Danger testimony - Roxana
Tiron (The Hill)
Rep. Curt Weldon (R-Pa.) has gathered at
least 202 Congress members’ signatures for a request that
participants of an intelligence cell that may have identified
some of the Sept. 11 ringleaders a year before the attacks be
allowed to testify before Congress. Weldon has been
leading the crusade for months, but his colleagues, several of
them prominent members of the GOP conference, now appear to be
listening. Weldon plans to send the letter to Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in the coming days requesting that he
allow the participants in the cell known as “Able Danger” to
testify in open congressional hearings.
JOURNALISM
"CROCK OF ****" AWARD:
Washington Post columnist
Ruth Marcus fantasizes about the good ol' days of
"consensus" -
which makes me wonder if there is enough Peyote in all
of D.C. to make Ruth Bader Ginsburg look like a
"centrist." Read on . . .
Justice Ginsburg: Rewriting history, the
Washington Post way - Ruth Marcus (Washington
Post)
To hear some Republicans tell it, letting Ruth Bader
Ginsburg onto the Supreme Court was a tough pill to
swallow. She was an ACLU-loving, bra-burning
feminazi, but they supported her anyway, dutifully
respecting the president's right to put his own
stamp on the high court. Therefore, Democrats now
owe President Bush the same deference when weighing
his choice of Samuel Alito. Ginsburg had
"supported taxpayer funding for abortion,
constitutional right to prostitution and polygamy,"
Texas Sen. John Cornyn (R) said at the confirmation
hearings for Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. "And
she opposed Mother's and Father's Days as
discriminatory occasions. But nevertheless,
Republicans . . . put that aside and supported her
nomination because she had terrific credentials, and
because President Clinton was entitled to nominate
someone to the Supreme Court of his choosing."
|
FEC opines that web sites covered by "press exemption" of
campaign finance laws (Federal Election Commission)
Draft Advisory opinion
2005-16, issued by the FEC on November 10, 2005, holds that
"the costs. . .incur[red] in covering or carrying news
stories, commentary, or editorials on. . .websites are
encompassed by the press exemption" to the Federal Election
Campaign Act of 1971, "and therefore do not constitute
'expenditures' or 'contributions' under the Act and
Commission regulations." Although the draft adviory
opinion is in response to specific inquiries made by the
Fired Up political web sites (firedupmissouri.com,
firedupmaryland.com, firedupwashington.com and
firedupamerica.com), there does not appear to be any reason
that the holding would not be applicable to other such news
and opinion websites.
House Republicans respond to
Murtha's call for U.S. to cut-and-run from Iraq
(SeanRobins.com)
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm Duncan Hunter, chairman of the House
Armed Services Committee. And I'm joined by my colleagues today
to make some comments regarding the recent congressional
initiatives that would call for an immediate pullout of American
forces from Iraq. You know, American military operations have two
phases. In the attack phase there's great patriotism, there's a
groundswell of support for the troops and much flag waving..
The second phase is a more difficult phase. That's a time when
you have casualties. That's the time when you make incremental
gains. And it's a time when you sometimes see faltering
political support. That always happens. And right now in the
war-fighting theater in Iraq, we're in the second phase.
Deja vu
Murtha: May 6, 2004 - Hans Nichols (The Hill)
Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) told his Democratic
colleagues Tuesday that he feared the war in Iraq is unwinnable
if the U.S. military does not dramatically increase troop
levels, provide more ground support and seek significant
international involvement. But Murtha — a Vietnam veteran,
an early Democratic advocate of President Bush’s authority to
invade Iraq and one of Congress’s staunchest supporters of the
military — expressed serious doubts that those remedies are even
faint possibilities, given current military deployments, a lack
of support from NATO allies and widespread outrage over the
mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners of war.
Why
did the 9/11 Commission ignore "Able Danger"? - Louis Freeh
(OpinionJournal.com)
It was interesting to hear from the 9/11 Commission again on
Tuesday. This self-perpetuating and privately funded group of
lobbyists and lawyers has recently opined on hurricanes, nuclear
weapons, the Baltimore Harbor Tunnel and even the New York
subway system. Now it offers yet another "report card" on the
progress of the FBI and CIA in the war against terrorism, along
with its "back-seat" take and some further unsolicited narrative
about how things ought to be on the "front lines." Yet
this is also a good time for the country to make some
assessments of the 9/11 Commission itself. Recent revelations
from the military intelligence operation code-named "Able
Danger" have cast light on a missed opportunity that could have
potentially prevented 9/11. Specifically, Able Danger concluded
in February 2000 that military experts had identified Mohamed
Atta by name (and maybe photograph) as an al Qaeda agent
operating in the U.S. Subsequently, military officers assigned
to Able Danger were prevented from sharing this critical
information with FBI agents, even though appointments had been
made to do so. Why?
Egos out of
control: Sens. Specter and Harkin try to name buildings. .
.after themselves (DrudgeReport.com)
Senators Arlen Specter (R-PA) and Tom Harkin (D-IA) named
buildings after THEMSELVES in the Labor-HHS Appropriations
conference -- which they oversaw! The 2006 Labor, Health
and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Subcommittee
Conference Report (109-300) names two new buildings at the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) after the
Chairman, Senator Arlen Specter, and Ranking Democratic Member,
Senator Tom Harkin. The building with the new visitors
center would be named after Senator Harkin.
Better check 'em for hand grenades: Palestinian kids undergo
heart surgery in Israel (YNetNews.com)
The lives of
100 Palestinian children have been saved under an EU- funded
project carried out by the Save a Child’s Heart organization at
the Wolfson Medical Centre in Holon, the Delegation of the
European Commission to Israel reported. The project - The
Heart of the Matter - provides Palestinian children with open
heart surgery and other life-saving treatment. As part of this
process the parents of the Palestinian children encounter the
parents of Israeli children undergoing similar operations at the
Wolfson Medical Center in an atmosphere of mutual understanding
and respect that spreads to their broader communities,” the EU
said in a statement.
Orange County, Florida NAACP head turns. . .Republican
- Scott Maxwell (Orlando Sentinel)
For decades, Republicans have struggled to reach out to black
Americans. But now in Orange County, the GOP has to reach no
further than the NAACP. As of this week, Derrick Wallace,
head of Orange County's NAACP, has switched parties -- to become
a Republican. "I've thought about this for two years,"
Wallace said Tuesday afternoon, just a few hours after returning
from the elections office. "This is not a decision I made
yesterday."
Woodward could be a boon to Libby - Carold D. Leonnig & Jim
VandeHei (Washington Post)
The revelation that The Washington Post's Bob Woodward may have
been the first reporter to learn about CIA operative Valerie
Plame could provide a boost to the only person indicted in the
leak case: I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Legal experts said
Woodward provided two pieces of new information that cast at
least a shadow of doubt on the public case against Libby, Vice
President Cheney's former chief of staff, who has been indicted
on perjury and obstruction of justice charges. Woodward
testified Monday that contrary to Special Counsel Patrick J.
Fitzgerald's public statements, a senior government official --
not Libby -- was the first Bush administration official to tell
a reporter about Plame and her role at the CIA. More ==>
Woodward's public statement |
Walter Pincus on Woodward |
Ben Bradlee on Woodward
Woodward on the ropes: Post newsroom snips away (MediaBistro.com)
The Post's internal critiques are proving to be a real
opportunity for internal discussion -- and the critiques in the
wake of the Bob Woodward controversy of this week are no
exception. Now in the wake of more revelations and debates
over leaked information, the internal message boards are humming
with a debate over, well, leaks from the message boards.
Today they're debating the propriety of the critiques, given
that the more interesting ones often end up leaking outside the
newsroom--and being posted on blogs, running in Washingtonian
magazine, and even--horror of horrors--being quoted by Howard
Kurtz in the paper itself.
Joe Wilson's nose resurfaces: Probe Woodward - Adam Entous (Reuters)
Joseph Wilson,
the husband of outed CIA operative Valerie Plame, called on
Thursday for an inquiry by The Washington Post into the conduct
of journalist Bob Woodward, who repeatedly criticized the leak
investigation without disclosing his own involvement. "It
certainly gives the appearance of a conflict of interest. He was
taking an advocacy position when he was a party to it," Wilson
said. Woodward testified under oath on Monday to special
prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald that a senior Bush administration
official casually told him in mid-June 2003 about Plame's
position at the CIA.
Ronnie Earle denied impropriety in procurement of DeLay
indictment from third grand jury - Christy Hoppe (Kansas
City Star)
After a month of silence, District
Attorney Ronnie Earle filed court papers on Wednesday denying
that prosecutors did anything improper before a grand jury to
obtain a money laundering indictment against U.S. Rep. Tom
DeLay. Defense attorney Dick DeGuerin has requested that a
judge throw out the indictment against DeLay, R-Texas, who had
to step down as House majority leader after the grand jury
acted. DeGuerin, in court filings, has accused prosecutors
of unlawfully participating in grand jury deliberations, trying
to coerce reluctant jurors into issuing an indictment and
violating secrecy laws by telling one panel about another's
considerations.
You may be a liberal if. . . (FreeRepublic.com)
You are against the
War on Terror, but are only too happy to make millions of
dollars by making movies about it. You preach about the
evils of Capitalism from the comfort of your Beverly Hills
estate. You cry about "profiteering corporations", but
still demand your weekly paycheck. You think "rich people"
are evil, but are willing to over-look the fact that Ted
Kennedy, Bill Clinton, George Soros, Michael Moore, and Al
Franken are "rich", as well. You scream and shout when
innocent civilians are accidentally caught in the cross-fire,
but remain silent when terrorists kill them on purpose.
|
|
November 16, 2005
(top)
|
Dick
Cheney slams Dems: "Losing their memory. . .and backbone. . ."
(SeanRobins.com)
From the prepared text of an address by Vice President, Dick
Cheney, delivered at the 2005 Ronald Reagan Gala, at the
Frontiers of Freedom Institute, concerning the disingenuous and
dangerous "rewrite" of history that the Democrats are
undertaking of their pre-war positions:
| As most of you know, I have
spent a lot of years in public service, and first
came to work in Washington, D.C. back in the late
1960s. I know what it's like to operate in a highly
charged political environment, in which the players
on all sides of an issue feel passionately and speak
forcefully. In such an environment people sometimes
lose their cool, and yet in Washington you can
ordinarily rely on some basic measure of
truthfulness and good faith in the conduct of
political debate.
But in the last several weeks we have seen a wild
departure from that tradition. And the suggestion
that's been made by some U. S. senators that the
President of the United States or any member of this
Administration purposely misled the American people
on pre-war intelligence is one of the most dishonest
and reprehensible charges ever aired in this city.
Some of the most irresponsible comments have, of
course, come from politicians who actually voted in
favor of authorizing force against Saddam Hussein.
These are elected officials who had access to the
intelligence, and were free to draw their own
conclusions. They arrived at the same judgment about
Iraq's capabilities and intentions that was made by
this Administration and by the previous
Administration.
There was broad-based, bipartisan agreement that
Saddam Hussein was a threat ... that he had violated
U.N. Security Council Resolutions ... and that, in a
post-9/11 world, we couldn't afford to take the word
of a dictator who had a history of WMD programs, who
had excluded weapons inspectors, who had defied the
demands of the international community, who had been
designated an official state sponsor of terror, and
who had committed mass murder. Those are facts.
What we're hearing now is some politicians
contradicting their own statements and making a play
for political advantage in the middle of a war. The
saddest part is that our people in uniform have been
subjected to these cynical and pernicious falsehoods
day in and day out. American soldiers and Marines
are out there every day in dangerous conditions and
desert temperatures - conducting raids, training
Iraqi forces, countering attacks, seizing weapons,
and capturing killers - and back home a few
opportunists are suggesting they were sent into
battle for a lie. The President and I cannot prevent
certain politicians from losing their memory, or
their backbone - but we're not going to sit by and
let them rewrite history.
We're going to continue throwing their own words
back at them. And far more important, we're going to
continue sending a consistent message to the men and
women who are fighting the war on terror in Iraq,
Afghanistan, and many other fronts. We can never say
enough how much we appreciate them, and how proud
they make us. They and their families can be
certain: That this cause is right ... and the
performance of our military has been brave and
honorable ... and this nation will stand behind our
fighting forces with pride and without wavering
until the day of victory. |
Woodward was told of Plame more than two years ago - Carold
D. Leonnig & Jim VandeHei (Washington Post)
Washington Post Assistant Managing Editor Bob Woodward testified
under oath Monday in the CIA leak case that a senior
administration official told him about CIA operative Valerie
Plame and her position at the agency nearly a month before her
identity was disclosed. In a more than two-hour
deposition, Woodward told Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald
that the official casually told him in mid-June 2003 that Plame
worked as a CIA analyst on weapons of mass destruction, and that
he did not believe the information to be classified or
sensitive, according to a statement Woodward released yesterday.
Bridge to nowhere,
going nowhere - Sam Bishop (Fairbanks Daily News-Miner)
Sen. Ted Stevens says earmarks for controversial bridges near
Anchorage and Ketchikan will be removed from federal law under a
proposal agreed to by members of a House-Senate team negotiating
a transportation spending bill. The $452.5 million
earmarked for the bridges will still go to Alaska, but it won't
be directed to the bridges, according to Stevens. It's
unfortunate that Alaska has been unfairly maligned in the press,
and by some members of Congress, forcing the Appropriations
Committee to take this drastic measure," Stevens said in a quote
relayed by his spokeswoman, Courtney Schikora Boone. More
==>
Sierra Club press release |
Daily Mining Gazette
U.S. Rep. Charles Bass (R-NH) calls for change in GOP House
leadership (N.H. Union Leader)
Five-term
Republican Rep. Charles Bass said this week his party’s leaders
in the House of Representatives are more concerned about their
own pet projects than the GOP’s “fundamental principles."
Bass, co-chair of a group of about 35 moderate House Republicans
called the “Tuesday Group,” is calling for new elections in
leadership next year “so we have a fresh slate of officers
outside of the speaker for the next session of the Congress." .
. . Bass noted that he has expressed concern about the direction
of the Republican Party in Washington “all along, but the
difference is that Republicans are now down and everyone is
listening to this sort of thing."
|
|
November 15, 2005
(top)
|
Did
Senator Rockefeller commit treason?
(SeanRobins.com)
The
more Democrats try to force the pre-war intelligence and
decision to go to war issues into something politically
advantageous to themselves, the more twisted they and their
logic becomes, and the more trouble they keep causing for
themselves.
The Sunday talking head shows can be fascinating, if you can
keep your head from exploding while watching. This
Sunday's edition of
FOX News Sunday,
with Chris Wallace, was certainly no exception. Watching
Sen. Rockefeller--who was appearing with Republican Senator Pat
Roberts, Chair to his Vice Chair on the Senate Intelligence
Committee--trying to wriggle and slither himself out of the 2002
vote authorizing President bush to use force against Iraq, was
an almost awe-inspiring sight to behold.
It is a positively slovenly new dance that Senate Democrats and
their political and media allies are currently trying to
perfect, known as the "I voted for the war in Iraq,
before I voted against it" dance. Never mind the
crashing disaster that was the same line of reasoning used
by Senator Kerry in discussing his vote to fund the war.
("I voted for the $87 billion, before I voted against
it.") In the case of Kerry's political turnabout on war
funding, he actually did vote against the $87 billion in
funding. . but when the going got tough during the run-up to the
'04 election, the French-looking Senator from Massachusetts
tried to have it both ways, and appear to be more hawkish than
he really was.
In Rockefeller's case this Sunday, however--and in the case of
oh so many Dems these days--in keeping with their new
"strategy," they really did vote to authorize the use of
force against Iraq. (Go
here for an
exhaustive review of what many Dems have said and believed about
weapons of mass destruction over the years.) Specifically
in Senator Rockefeller's case, on
October 10, 2002,
he told his Senate colleagues the following:
| There is
unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop
nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next 5
years. He could have it earlier if he is able to obtain fissile materials on
the outside market, which is possible--difficult but possible. We also
should remember we have always underestimated the progress that Saddam
Hussein has been able to make in the development of weapons of mass
destruction. When Saddam Hussein obtains nuclear capabilities, the
constraints that he feels will diminish dramatically, and the risk to
America's homeland, as well as to America's allies, will increase even more
dramatically. Our existing policies to contain or counter Saddam will
become, therefore, irrelevant. * * *
Saddam has used chemical weapons before, both
against Iraq's enemies and against his own people. He is working to develop
delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring
these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle
East. He could make these weapons available to many terrorist groups, third
parties, which have contact with his government. Those groups, in turn,
could bring those weapons into the United States and unleash a devastating
attack against our citizens. I fear that greatly. We cannot know for
certain that Saddam will use the weapons of mass destruction that he
currently possesses or that he will use them against us. But as we do know,
Saddam has the capability to do that. We know that very well. Rebuilding
that capability has been a higher priority for Saddam than the welfare of
his own people, and he has ill will toward Americans. I am forced to
conclude on all the evidence that Saddam poses a significant risk. Some
argue it would be totally irrational for Saddam Hussein to initiate an
attack against the mainland United States and believe he would not do so.
But if Saddam thought he could attack America through terrorist proxies and
cover the trail back to Baghdad, he might not think it is so irrational. If
he thought, as he got older and looked around an impoverished and isolated
Iraq , his principal legacy to the Arab world to be a brutal attack on the
United States, he might not think it is so irrational. If he thought the
U.S. would be too paralyzed with fear to respond, he might not think it was
too irrational. * * *
As the attacks of September 11 demonstrated,
the immense destructiveness of modern technology means we can no longer
afford to wait around for a smoking gun. The fact that an attack on our
homeland has not occurred since September 11 cannot give us any false sense
of security that one will not occur in the future or on any day. We no
longer have that luxury. September 11 changed America. It made us
realize we must deal differently with the very real threat, the overwhelming
threat and reality of terrorism, whether it comes from shadowy groups
operating in the mountains of Afghanistan or in 70 other countries around
the world or in our own country.
There has been some debate over how
``imminent'' a threat Iraq poses. I do believe Iraq poses an imminent
threat. I also believe after September 11, that question is increasingly
outdated. It is in the nature of these weapons that he has and the way
they are targeted against civilian populations, that documented capability
and demonstrated intent may be the only warning we get. To insist on further
evidence could put some of our fellow Americans at risk. Can we afford to
take that chance? I do not think we can.
The President has rightly called Saddam
Hussein's efforts to develop weapons of mass destruction a grave and
gathering threat to Americans. The global community has tried but has failed
to address that threat over the past decade. I have come to the inescapable
conclusion that the threat posed to America by Saddam's weapons of mass
destruction is so serious that despite the risks--and we should not minimize
the risks--we must authorize the President to take the necessary steps to
deal with that threat. So I will vote for the Lieberman-McCain resolution.
|
Senator Rockefeller is an
extreme example, even among extreme examples of today's
twisted-talking Democrats on the subject of their October 2002
votes to authorize the use of force against Iraq.
Rockefeller voted in the affirmative, in support of giving
President Bush the authority to take the nation into war against
Iraq. And make no mistake about it, Rockefeller was not
relying upon "16 words" in a State of the Union address that had
not yet been spoken. Nor was he predicating his vote upon
some imagined urging of "imminence" from the President.
Rockefeller was basing his vote--as most Democrats who voted
"yes" were basing their votes--upon the same intelligence
reporting upon which the President was acting. Rockefeller
set forth his concerns clearly and succinctly: Saddam is a
threat, he is working hard to obtain nuclear weapons, and we
cannot await their definitive appearance or use to act in our
own defense:
|
There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein
is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons
and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next
5 years. He could have it earlier if he is able to
obtain fissile materials on the outside market,
which is possible--difficult but possible. * *
*
As the attacks of
September 11 demonstrated, the immense
destructiveness of modern technology means we can no
longer afford to wait around for a smoking gun. The
fact that an attack on our homeland has not occurred
since September 11 cannot give us any false sense of
security that one will not occur in the future or on
any day. We no longer have that luxury. * * *
There has been some
debate over how ``imminent'' a threat Iraq poses. I
do believe Iraq poses an imminent threat. I also
believe after September 11, that question is
increasingly outdated. It is in the nature of
these weapons that he has and the way they are
targeted against civilian populations, that
documented capability and demonstrated intent may be
the only warning we get. To insist on further
evidence could put some of our fellow Americans at
risk. Can we afford to take that chance? I do not
think we can. |
Who can argue with the Senator
Rockefeller of October 10, 2002? Answer? The Senator
Rockefeller of November, 2005, who appeared on
FOX News Sunday.
After playing a portion of this speech to the Senator, host
Chris Wallace asked Rockefeller about the concurrence of his
(and fellow Dems) conclusions about the pre-war intelligence
that President Bush did. Almost like an animal caught in
the grasp of the steel jaws of a trap, Senator Rockefeller's
response to Wallace's questioning was almost akin to the animal
gnawing off its own leg to escape:
| WALLACE: OK. Senator Rockefeller, the president says that Democratic critics, like you, looked at pre-war intelligence and came to the same conclusion that he did.
In fact, looking back at the speech that you gave in October of 2002 in which you authorized the use of force, you went further than the president ever did. Let's watch:
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
ROCKEFELLER: I do believe that Iraq poses an imminent threat, but I also believe that after September 11th that question is increasingly outdated.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
WALLACE: Now, the president never said that Saddam Hussein was an imminent threat. As you saw, you did say that. If anyone hyped the intelligence, isn't it Jay Rockefeller?
ROCKEFELLER: No. I mean, this question is asked a thousand times and I'll be happy to answer it a thousand times. I took a trip by myself in January of 2002 to Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria, and I told each of the heads of state that it was my view that George Bush had already made up his mind to go to war against Iraq, that that was a predetermined set course which had taken shape shortly after 9/11.
Now, the intelligence that they had and the intelligence that we had were probably different. We didn't get the presidential daily briefs. We got only a finished product, a finished product, a consensual view of the intelligence community, which does not allow for agencies — like in the case of the aluminum tubes, the Department of Energy said these aren't thick enough to handle nuclear power.
They left that out and went ahead with, "They have aluminum tubes and they're going to develop nuclear power."
WALLACE: Senator, you're quite right. You didn't get the presidential daily brief or the senior executive intelligence brief. You got the national intelligence estimate.
But the Silberman commission, a presidential commission that looked into this, did get copies of those briefs, and they say that they were, if anything, even more alarmist, even less nuanced, than the intelligence you saw, and yet you, not the president, said that Saddam Hussein was an imminent threat.
ROCKEFELLER: The Silverman commission was absolutely prohibited by the president in his charge to them — he appointed them — from ever looking at the use of intelligence, whether it was misused, whether it was massaged to influence the American people to go along with a decision which he had long ago already decided to make.
WALLACE: But didn't they come to that conclusion which I just stated, that the presidential daily brief was, in fact, more alarmist and less nuanced than the intelligence you saw?
ROCKEFELLER: I don't know, because I never get to see, nor does Pat, the presidential daily brief. All I know is that we don't get the intelligence that they do.
We are called the Senate Intelligence Committee. We get a lot more than the rest of the Senate, but it was incomplete as to what the president gets, and it was obviously entirely wrong, which raises the question of why was it wrong.
|
Try hard as he might, there is
little Rockefeller can do to avoid responsibility for his own
conclusions of October 2002. He can certainly deliver a
litany of excuses--and that is what the present Democratic
strategy is all about--but he cannot change the history of what
he believed, and what he said, and how he voted in 2002.
The "excuse" strategy is not even a terribly dignified one for
Democrats. It requires the use of the argument, in
essence, that they all were duped by President Bush, and "faulty
intelligence," intelligence which President Bush didn't know was
bad, bust should have known, but which Democrats shouldn't
have known was bad. "We was fooled"--best sums up the
strategy.
Again, Wallace attempts to get
Rockefeller on the record as accepting responsibility for his
own vote, for this own decision. But to little avail, as
Rockefeller even states at one point that he is not
responsible for his own vote:
| WALLACE: Senator Rockefeller, I want to play another clip from your 2002 speech authorizing the use of force, this time specifically on the question of Saddam's nuclear program. Here it is.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
ROCKEFELLER: There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years, and he could have it earlier.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
WALLACE: Now, by that point, Senator, you had read the National Intelligence Estimate, correct?
ROCKEFELLER: In fact, there were only six people in the Senate who did, and I was one of them. I'm sure Pat was another.
WALLACE: OK. But you had read that, and now we've read a declassified...
ROCKEFELLER: But, Chris, let's...
WALLACE: Can I just ask my question, sir?
ROCKEFELLER: Yes.
WALLACE: And then you can answer as you choose. That report indicated there was a disagreement among analysts about the nuclear program. The State Department had a lot more doubts than the CIA did about whether he was pursuing the nuclear program. You never mentioned those doubts. You came to the same conclusion the president did.
ROCKEFELLER: Because that — first of all, that National Intelligence Estimate was not called for by the administration. It was called for by former Senator Bob Graham, who was chairman of the Intelligence Committee, and Dick Durbin.
We didn't receive it until just a couple of days before we voted. Then we had to go read it and compare it to everything else that we thought we'd learned about intelligence, and I did make that statement. And I did make that vote.
But, Chris, the important thing is that when I started looking at the weapons of mass destruction intelligence along with Pat Roberts, I went down to the floor, and I said I made a mistake. I would have never voted yes if I knew what I know today.
WALLACE: Well, but a lot of people are not — that's not the point of the investigation, Senator.
ROCKEFELLER: Chris, it is always the same conversation. You know, it was not the Congress that sent 135,000 or 150,000 troops to...
WALLACE: But you voted, sir, and aren't you responsible for your vote?
ROCKEFELLER: No. I'm...
WALLACE: You're not?
ROCKEFELLER: No. I'm responsible for my vote, but I'd appreciate it if you'd get serious about this subject, with all due respect. We authorized him to continue working with the United Nations, and then if that failed, authorized him to use force to enforce the sanctions.
We did not send 150,000 troops or 135,000 troops. It was his decision made probably two days after 9/11 that he was going to invade Iraq. That we did not have a part of. And yes, we had bad intelligence, and when we learned about it, I went down to the floor and I said I would have never voted for this thing.
WALLACE: But my only point, sir — and I am trying to be serious about it — is as I understand phase two, the question is based on the intelligence you had, what were the statements you made.
You had the National Intelligence Estimate which expressed doubts about Saddam's nuclear program, yet you said he had a nuclear program. The president did the same thing.
|
Can anyone discern from all of
this a single, principled basis upon which Rockefeller--or any
of the others--should be relieved of responsibility for
believing the same things that President Bush believed, and for
acting upon the same intelligence that Bush acted upon?
| WALLACE: But you voted, sir, and aren't you responsible for your vote?
ROCKEFELLER: No. I'm...
WALLACE: You're not?
ROCKEFELLER: No. I'm responsible for my vote, but I'd appreciate it if you'd get serious about this subject, with all due respect.
|
Rockefeller must have been more
surprised than even the rest of us when he said "No," that he
wasn't responsible for his vote; but he quickly caught himself
and changed tune to: "I'm responsible for my vote, but . . .,"
and then proceeded to attack Wallace, accusing him of not being
"serious about this subject." Wallace's interview,
however, was completely, deadly serious.
Rockefeller's "turnabout and
cover your rear" performance is not unlike numerous similar
efforts being attempted by Democrats these days, in an
effort--as President Bush said in his Veterans Day address--to
rewrite the history of how the war began. It's an
interesting example, though.
Perhaps the most significant
"nugget" that came from Sunday's appearance on FOX, was
in response to Wallace's first jab at the start of the
interview. Wallace quips, based on the clip from
Rockefeller's speech, that rather than President Bush asserting
that the threat from Iraq was "imminent" (and as we all know,
Bush never said "imminent" in his
2003 State of the Union
address), it was Rockefeller who said the threat
posed by Saddam was "imminent."
Rockefeller then proceeds to
make a statement (let's call them the "59 words" in
Rockefeller's interview), which appears, in its context, to be
little more than another gratuitous slam against Bush's having
long ago decided to attack Iraq, a "predetermined set course
which had taken shape shortly after 9/11."
| WALLACE: Now, the president never said that Saddam Hussein was an imminent threat. As you saw, you did say that. If anyone hyped the intelligence, isn't it Jay Rockefeller?
ROCKEFELLER: No. I mean, this question is asked a thousand times and I'll be happy to answer it a thousand times. I took a trip by myself in January of 2002 to Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria, and I told each of the heads of state that it was my view that George Bush had already made up his mind to go to war against Iraq, that that was a predetermined set course which had taken shape shortly after 9/11.
|
The interesting bit is the
revelation that Rockefeller, on his own, journeyed to three
Middle Eastern nations, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria--each of
which, to different degrees, has, shall we say, something less
than the best interests of the United States at heart.
Each of which is or has been a state supporter of terrorism;
Syria even more directly appears to have been, and to continue
to be, a major participant and supporter of terrorist activities
and, with respect to Iraq, may be complicit in efforts by
Saddam's government to ferry WMDs out of Iraq, and stash them
elsewhere (like Syria).
So Rockefeller, a serving United
States Senator; Vice Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee;
not a member of the U.S. diplomatic corps; not having been
dispatched as a representative of the U.S. government--a
"mission" which would have to have been undertaken, if at all,
through assignment by the President--just thought he would pay a
few "courtesy" calls upon Middle Eastern heads of state with
interests ranging from somewhat divergent from ours. . .to
entirely opposite from ours. So, he went to Saudi Arabia.
. .to Jordan. . .to Syria. . .spoke with their heads of state. .
.and informed them that the President of the United States (in
Rockefeller's opinion) "had already made up his mind to go to
war against Iraq," and that he had done so right after the 9/11
attacks.
Even if true--but whether or
not true--how can such actions by a United States Senator,
who has sworn allegiance to this country, who has sworn to
"support and defend the constitution of the United States
against all enemies, foreign and domestic," and to "bear true
faith and allegiance to the same," and that he will "faithful
discharge the duties of [his] office," be explained?
Article II, sec. 3, of the U.S.
Constitution, defines "treason against the United States" as
consisting in "levying War against them, or in adhering to their
Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
So, why did Rockefeller go to
the Middle East in January, 2002? And why did he meet with
the heads of state of Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria? And
why did he tell them that he believed that President Bush had,
by that time--even earlier, right after 9/11--decided to go to
war against Iraq? That--should be the subject for
the next Congressional investigation--and for the next
independent commissions--and for the next special prosecutor:
Whether this U.S. Senator has committed treason.
The
Democrats' vendetta - Peter Lemiska (RenewAmerica.us)
As the President struggles to regain his footing, his supporters
— and there still are a few — wonder why his job approval rating
is so low. The economy is in good shape, home ownership is up,
gas prices are coming down, we haven't suffered a terrorist
attack in our country for four years, and our military might
toppled a terrorist regime in a matter of weeks. Besides
showing off their ability to make sows ears out of silk purses,
why are the Democrats so compelled to attack, not only the
President's policies, but his character, as well, by accusing
him of launching a war under false pretenses — a war that most
of them once supported?
GOP
has "sold out" conservatives on immigration - Paul Weyrich (RenewAmerica.us)
The thoughts I have offered in these columns on where the
conservative movement needs to go have generally looked
long-term, toward the time after the end of President Bush's
second term. But there is one issue that will not wait, and that
issue is immigration. We need to do something about immigration
now. Let me put this bluntly. On no issue have a
Republican administration and a Republican House and Senate more
blatantly or more cynically sold out the conservative movement
and our country than on immigration.
|
|
November 14, 2005
(top)
|
Maryland state GOP chair demands apology from Howard Dean for
slanderous comments (Maryland Republican Party)
Maryland Republican Party Chairman John M. Kane called on
Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean to issue a
retraction and apologize for his comments on Sunday’s nationally
televised program “Meet the Press.” During his appearance with Tim
Russert, Dean made a false statement regarding Chairman Kane and
failed to apologize for his party’s attacks on Lt. Governor
Michael Steele. “Howard Dean made a damaging and
slanderous statement yesterday on NBC’s ‘Meet
the Press,’ which I view as defamation of my character. Dean’s
comment was wholly incorrect and I am personally distressed that
the Chair of the DNC would state mistruths on a national
program. I am demanding that Howard Dean promptly apologize to
me for his slanderous comment,” Kane stated.
Subverting the Constitution: 75 years of indefensible Supreme
Court decisions - Henry Mark Holzer (FrontPageMagazine.com)
The retirement of Supreme
Court justice Sandra Day O’Connor (contingent upon her
replacement being seated), and the ensuing nominations of John
G. Roberts, Jr. and Samuel Alito, exposed once again the ongoing
moral, political, and legal schism between liberals and
conservatives over such hot-button constitutional law issues as
abortion, affirmative action, prisoners’ rights, establishment
of religion, and the power of Congress.
Liberals were desperate to extend, or at least retain, their
hegemony on the Court.
Conservatives saw an opportunity for the President to return the
Court to a proper constitutional balance, where respect for
federalism, separation of powers, and judicial restraint was not
the exception but the norm.
Judge,
now Chief Justice, Roberts dazzled the Senate Judiciary
Committee and was easily confirmed.
Judge
Alito will similarly impress the Committee, albeit in a more
understated manner, and he too will be confirmed.
New Orleans Dems seek delay in local elections; Need more Dems
to return to city - Melinda Deslatte (AP)
The state's elections
commissioner is recommending that the February election
scheduled for New Orleans be delayed because of the
complications caused by Hurricane Katrina, which displaced
thousands of the city's residents and demolished polling places.
"It would be too problematic. We're not ready," Commissioner of
Elections Angie LaPlace told a House committee on Monday.
LaPlace said she will recommend to Secretary of State Al Ater,
Louisiana's top elections official, that the Feb. 4 mayoral
primary scheduled for New Orleans, which includes city council
races and referendums, be postponed. If Ater agrees with
LaPlace's assessment, the governor would have to determine
whether to delay the election.
Who
is lying about Iraq? A campaign of distortion aims to
discredit the liberation - Norman Podhoretz (OpinionJournal.com)
Among the many
distortions, misrepresentations and outright falsifications that
have emerged from the debate over Iraq, one in particular stands
out above all others. This is the charge that George W. Bush
misled us into an immoral or unnecessary war in Iraq by telling
a series of lies that have now been definitively exposed.
What makes this charge so special is the amazing success it has
enjoyed in getting itself established as a self-evident truth
even though it has been refuted and discredited over and over
again by evidence and argument alike. In this it resembles
nothing so much as those animated cartoon characters who, after
being flattened, blown up or pushed over a cliff, always spring
back to life with their bodies perfectly intact. Perhaps, like
those cartoon characters, this allegation simply cannot be
killed off, no matter what. Nevertheless, I want to take
one more shot at exposing it for the lie that it itself really
is. Although doing so will require going over ground that I and
many others have covered before, I hope that revisiting this
well-trodden terrain may also serve to refresh memories that
have grown dim, to clarify thoughts that have grown confused,
and to revive outrage that has grown commensurately dulled.
Howard Dean goes ballistic. . .again (WorldNetDaily.com)
Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean used some of
his harshest language ever in a "Meet the Press" interview,
charging President Bush deliberately lied and deceived the
American people and Congress to lead them into the Iraq
invasion. In reacting to Bush's speech Friday, in which
the president charged Democrats were sending the wrong signal to
America's enemies with the focus on criticisms of pre-war
intelligence and the nation's conduct in the war. . .
NBC Prez Wright on liberal radio: Forget about it (Broadcasting
& Cable)
Symposiums can be snoozy affairs, but last week at the annual
media gathering wrangled by former Hearst Entertainment
President Ray Joslin at Trinity College in New York, NBC
Universal President Bob Wright and the person interviewing
him—MSNBC host Tucker Carlson—veered into some interesting
territory. Waxing nostalgic for the days when networks
played current events “down the middle,” Wright lamented the
over-the-top tone that cable-news channels are increasingly
embracing. And, of course, he laid responsibility for it all at
the feet of Fox News Channel.
Alito 1985 personnel document: No abortion right in the
Constitution - Bill Sammon (Washington Times)
Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr., President Bush's Supreme Court
nominee, wrote that "the Constitution does not protect a right
to an abortion" in a 1985 document obtained by The Washington
Times. I personally believe very strongly" in this legal
position, Mr. Alito wrote on his application to become deputy
assistant to Attorney General Edwin I. Meese III. The
document, which is likely to inflame liberals who oppose Judge
Alito's nomination to the Supreme Court, is among many that the
White House will release today from the Ronald Reagan
Presidential Library.
Religious freedom in Saudi Arabia: 750 lashes and 40 months in
prison for promoting "dubious idealogy": The Bible (Reuters)
A court sentenced a teacher to 40 months in prison and 750
lashes for "mocking religion" after he discussed the Bible and
praised Jews, a Saudi newspaper reported yesterday.
Al-Madina newspaper said secondary-school teacher Mohammad
al-Harbi, who will be flogged in public, was taken to court by
his colleagues and students. He was charged with promoting
a "dubious ideology, mocking religion, saying the Jews were
right, discussing the Gospel and preventing students from
leaving class to wash for prayer," the newspaper said.
Liberal attack groups to go after Alito on. . .everything?
- David D. Kirkpatrick (New York Times)
Seeking to move beyond the focus on abortion rights, a coalition
of liberal groups opposing the Supreme Court nomination of Judge
Samuel Alito is preparing a national TV advertising campaign
accusing him of threatening rights through other areas,
including police searches and employment discrimination.
The effort to turn the subject away from abortion -- which has
dominated the discussion among supporters and detractors of the
Alito nomination -- comes as Democrats are trying to dispel
their party's image as too absolutist on the issue.
Suicide, it's never too late: Disabled Australians sue for
"wrongful life" - Sharon Mathieson (The Australian)
The High Court has been asked to decide
whether severely disabled children can sue over medical
negligence which resulted in their birth rather than abortion.
In a landmark hearing, two disabled children, one now a young
woman and the other a three-year-old girl, are seeking the right
to sue their mothers' doctors for wrongful life. One of
the claims has been brought by Sydney woman Alexia Harriton, 24,
who was born deaf, blind, physically and mentally disabled and
not expected to live more than six months. She now
requires 24 hour a day care.
|
|
November 13, 2005
(top)
|
Coward
. . . (SeanRobins.com)
In
a brilliant move of political acumen, Ken Mehlman, Chair of the
Republican Party--who was appearing in back-to-back segments on
today's Meet the Press, with his Democratic Party
counterpart, howard Dean--prior to their appearances, bumped
into Dean, and challenged him to appear with Mehlman together,
rather than separately. Cowardly Dean, who, also according
to the Drudge
Report, has been ducking any such head-to-head appearances
with Mehlman since he was appointed DNC Chair in February,
flatly refused "with a shrug of his shoulders and an
uncomfortable cackle and then proceeded to walk away into the
green room." While it is certainly understandable what
motivates Howard Dean cowardly streak--he just doesn't stand a
chance in a head-to-head discussion of ideas and values, how
proud the Dems must be having their party represented by someone
who is unable to debate ideas and issues with anyone but
himself.
DNC fundraising under Dean: 2-1 behind Republicans - Chris
Cillizza (Washington Post)
The Democratic National Committee under Howard Dean is losing
the fundraising race against Republicans by nearly 2 to 1, a
slow start that is stirring concern among strategists who worry
that a cash shortage could hinder the party's competitiveness in
next year's midterm elections. The former Vermont governor
and presidential candidate took the chairmanship of the national
party eight months ago, riding the enthusiasm of grass-roots
activists who relished his firebrand rhetorical style. But he
faced widespread misgivings from establishment Democrats,
including elected officials and Washington operatives, who
questioned whether Dean was the right fit in a job that
traditionally has centered on fundraising and the courting of
major donors. Now, the latest financial numbers are
prompting new doubts. From January through September, the
Republican National Committee raised $81.5 million, with $34
million remaining in the bank. The Democratic National
Committee, by contrast, showed $42 million raised and $6.8
million in the bank.
The lie is the "Bush lied" - Norman Podhoretz (FrontPageMagazine.com)
Among the many
distortions, misrepresentations, and outright falsifications
that have emerged from the debate over Iraq, one in particular
stands out above all others. This is the charge that George W.
Bush misled us into an immoral and/or unnecessary war in Iraq by
telling a series of lies that have now been definitively
exposed.
What makes this charge so
special is the amazing success it has enjoyed in getting itself
established as a self-evident truth even though it has been
refuted and discredited over and over again by evidence and
argument alike. In this it resembles nothing so much as those
animated cartoon characters who, after being flattened, blown
up, or pushed over a cliff, always spring back to life with
their bodies perfectly intact. Perhaps, like those cartoon
characters, this allegation simply cannot be killed off, no
matter what. . . .
The main “lie” that George
W. Bush is accused of telling us is that Saddam Hussein
possessed an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, or WMD as
they have invariably come to be called.
|
|
November 12, 2005
(top)
|
President
Bush's Veterans Day address: Answering his critics -
George W. Bush
| And our debate at home must also be fair-minded. One of the hallmarks
of a free society and what makes our country strong is that our
political leaders can discuss their differences openly, even in times of
war. When I made the decision to remove Saddam Hussein from power,
Congress approved it with strong bipartisan support. I also recognize
that some of our fellow citizens and elected officials didn't support
the liberation of Iraq. And that is their right, and I respect it. As
President and Commander-in-Chief, I accept the responsibilities, and the
criticisms, and the consequences that come with such a solemn decision.
While it's perfectly legitimate to criticize my decision or the
conduct of the war, it is deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of
how that war began. Some Democrats and anti-war critics are
now claiming we manipulated the intelligence and misled the American
people about why we went to war. These critics are fully aware that a
bipartisan Senate investigation found no evidence of political pressure
to change the intelligence community's judgments related to Iraq's
weapons programs.
They also know that intelligence agencies from around the world
agreed with our assessment of Saddam Hussein. They know the United
Nations passed more than a dozen resolutions citing his development and
possession of weapons of mass destruction. And many of these critics
supported my opponent during the last election, who explained his
position to support the resolution in the Congress this way: "When I
vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use
force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe
that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a
threat, and a grave threat, to our security." That's why more than a
hundred Democrats in the House and the Senate -- who had access to the
same intelligence -- voted to support removing Saddam Hussein from
power.
The stakes in the global war on terror are too high, and the national
interest is too important, for politicians to throw out false charges.
These baseless attacks send the wrong signal to our troops and to an
enemy that is questioning America's will. As our troops fight a ruthless
enemy determined to destroy our way of life, they deserve to know that
their elected leaders who voted to send them to war continue to stand
behind them. Our troops deserve to know that this support will
remain firm when the going gets tough. And our troops deserve to
know that whatever our differences in Washington, our will is strong,
our nation is united, and we will settle for nothing less than victory.
|
The Clinton Administration's public case against Saddam Hussein
(New American Century)
In June of 1997, Iraq officials had ratcheted up their
obstruction of UNSCOM inspection efforts. They interfered with
UNSCOM air operations and denied and delayed access of
inspectors to sites. In September, they burned documents at
sites while inspectors watched outside the front entrance. By
mid-November, Saddam Hussein had demanded an end to U-2
surveillance flights over Iraq and called on American inspectors
to leave Iraq.1 Iraqis also began moving
equipment that could produce weapons of mass destruction out of
the range of video cameras inspectors had installed inside key
industrial facilities. At first, the Clinton
administration adopted a generally reserved tone toward Saddam's
provocations. "We believe that he needs to fulfill all the
Security Council obligations and that that is an appropriate way
to deal with him," commented Secretary Albright at a November 5
press conference with the German foreign minister. The
next day Secretary Cohen held a ceremony unrelated to Iraq, but,
citing "an unusual array" of journalists present, he also spoke
on Iraq. "[I]t's imperative that Iraq comply with U.N.
mandates," said Cohen, but "the task right now, however, is to
persuade them to cease and desist from their obstruction." And
when asked what would be the consequences should Saddam not
comply, Cohen said simply, "it's important that we not speculate
what those reactions might be."
Unilateral disarmament in the war on terror (OpinionJournal.com)
If Osama bin Laden is alive and looking for signs of flagging
U.S. will to fight the war on terror, he need look no further
than our national debate about interrogating his compatriots and
others who would do us harm. Post-9/11, after all, it is
hardly far-fetched to imagine a scenario in which our ability to
extract information from a terrorist is the only thing that
might prevent a bioterror attack or even the nuclear
annihilation of an American city. And we know for a fact that
information wrung from 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
and others has helped prevent further attacks on U.S. soil.
Yet according to many Bush Administration critics, the
aggressive and stressful questioning techniques used
successfully against the likes of KSM put the U.S. on a slippery
slope to widespread "torture" and the prisoner abuses at Abu
Ghraib. John McCain (R., Arizona) has pushed an amendment
through the Senate that would effectively bar all stressful
interrogation techniques. The danger for American security is
that this would telegraph to every terrorist in the world that
he has absolutely nothing to fear from silence should he fall
into U.S.
15 Nights and still counting - Elaine Ganley (AP)
The number of
cars torched overnight in France climbed slightly over the
previous night to 502 in a 16th night of unrest that took its
heaviest toll on the French provinces, police said Saturday.
Security was boosted in the capital with some 3,000 police
officers fanning out around strategic points to counter feared
weekend attacks targeting Paris. Gatherings were banned from
Saturday morning until Sunday morning. "We returned to an almost
normal situation in Ile de France," said national police chief
Michel Gaudin, referring to the Paris region. Arson attacks were
counted in 163 towns around France, he said. The count of those
detained overnight stood at 206, bringing to 2,440 the number of
suspects picked up in just over two weeks of unrest.
Jesse Jackson and Ralph Nader weign in on Terrell Owens; Please
mind your own businesses (NBC10.com)
Add the Rev. Jesse Jackson to the list of famous people who want
to get involved in Terrell Owens' suspension from the Eagles.
Jackson has joined another former presidential candidate, Ralph
Nader, in calling for the NFL to let Owens rejoin the Eagles or
release him from his contract. This punishment is much too
severe for the charge," Jackson said. "If (Owens) had been
caught shaving points, selling drugs, carrying a gun or fighting
some fans, who provoked him, and he had not shown sufficient
restraint, we could understand the severe suspension."
The uranium Saddam did have (NewsMax.com)
Though President Bush didn't
mention it in his speech yesterday rebutting critics of his
administration's use of intelligence on Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction, experts say that Saddam Hussein had stockpiled
enough partially enriched uranium to produce at least one
full-fledged nuclear bomb. . . . Even Saddam's 500-ton
un-enriched uranium stockpile, which he stored at the same
nuclear weapons research facility where inspectors found his
partially enriched stash, posed a potential threat. . . . "You
have a warehouse containing 500 tons of natural uranium," Dombey
wrote. "You need 25 kilograms of U235 to build one weapon. How
many nuclear weapons can you build?The answer is 142 [nuclear
bombs]," he said.
Converup continues in yet-to-be-released Clinton IRA report
(NewsMax.com)
A three-judge panel overseeing Independent Counsel David
Barrett's investigation into abuses by the Internal Revenue
Service under the Clinton administration has ordered Barrett to
make "discrete deletions" is the draft he submitted 15 months
ago. The deletion order "has stoked speculation that [it]
has more to do with the next presidential campaign," reports the
Wall Street Journal, noting widespread rumors that "the draft
report contains information potentially embarrassing to another
Clinton administration figure, former first lady and current New
York Sen. Hillary Clinton." "The one Clinton official rumored to
be implicated in the report is former IRS Commissioner Margaret
Richardson, a friend of the former first lady," the paper said.
|
|
November 11, 2005
(top)
|
FOX
News confirms Paul Vallely and Joe Wilson appeared on-air in
2002: Nine times on the same day, twice on the same program
- Brit Hume (FOX News)
Former CIA officer and
one time FOX contributor Larry Johnson is calling retired
general and FOX military analyst Paul Vallely a "right wing
[hack] making up facts,” after Vallely said former Ambassador
Joseph Wilson told him his wife worked at the CIA as both waited
to appear on FOX programs. This as liberal Websites say
they have proof Vallely is lying, saying research service
LexisNexis shows Vallely and Wilson never appeared on FOX on the
same day. But in fact, Vallely and Wilson appeared on the same
day nine times in 2002, and on the same show twice — on
September 8 and September 12, when both men appeared within 15
minutes of one another.
Senate curtails legal ability of Guantanamo detainees to
challenge their status - Liz Sidoti (AP)
The Senate voted Thursday to bar foreign terror suspects at the
U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, from filing lawsuits in
American courts to challenge their detentions, despite a Supreme
Court ruling last year that granted such access. In a
49-42 vote, senators added the provision by Sen. Lindsey Graham,
R-S.C., to a sweeping defense policy bill. Under the
provision, Guantanamo Bay detainees would be allowed to appeal
their status as an "enemy combatant" one time, to the Circuit
Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. But they would not be able
to file petitions known as writs of habeas corpus, which are
used to fight unlawful detentions, in that or any other U.S.
court.
DeLay's lawyers demand documents from prosecutor's office -
April Castro (AP)
Attorneys for Rep. Tom DeLay asked his
prosecutor Thursday to provide any internal communications from
the district attorney's office that had argued against indicting
the former House majority leader. The defense attorneys
hope such documents would show that Democratic District Attorney
Ronnie Earle went after the powerful Republican despite
opposition from grand juries dealing with the case. That could
bolster defense arguments that the money laundering and
conspiracy charges against DeLay should be dropped.
Earle's office would not comment on the written request from
defense attorney Dick DeGuerin asking for "internal notes,
memoranda or documents which recommend against seeking an
indictment against Tom DeLay."
House intelligence committee will probe Washington Post CIA
prisons leak - Katherine Shrader (AP)
The House Intelligence Committee will look into a
possible leak of classified information about secret CIA prisons
but will not reopen its 2003 inquiry into prewar intelligence on
Iraq. As calls for intelligence-related reviews grow on
Capitol Hill, Rep. Peter Hoekstra, R-Mich., said Thursday his
committee will study several specific leaks of classified
information, including a Nov. 2 Washington Post story that
discussed the existence of secret CIA prisons overseas.
Republican bedwetters on the Hill - Blanton (RedState.org)
According to sources
on Capitol Hill, House Leadership still does not have the votes
for the Deficit Reduction Act (H.R. 4241) but is working
furiously to get them. This is the biggest vote of the
109th Congress – period. It is the first time Republicans are
attempting to seriously address out-of-control spending since
1997 by reducing its rate of growth by saving $50 billion over
five years. However, this vote has become far more about
symbolism than substance (although the substance is good), and
it is now about the soul of the House Republican majority. Late
in September, conservatives on the Republican Study Committee
(RSC), led by Reps. Mike Pence (IN) and Jeb Hensarling (TX),
sent shock waves through their party with their Operation Offset
and dared to assert what the base already knew – that federal
spending is out-of-control. House Leadership, after initially
balking, finally tried to ante up for their big spending ways
and embraced a $50 billion savings package as a down payment to
fully pay for the Katrina relief effort. The moderate Tuesday
Group, catered to for years, took umbrage with the RSC's recent
efforts and now refuses to give the RSC a victory. For the
moderates, it has become us against them. Leadership even
took drilling in ANWR and the Outer Continental Shelf out of the
package late last night to get their vote, and they still have
not come around.
RINOs?: Growth of the Republican turncoat (Wall Street
Journal)
Republican disarray
on Capitol Hill reached self-ramming speed yesterday, as both
the House and the Senate abandoned key policy priorities as they
tried to pass a budget. Hide the children because this is
getting ugly. In the Senate, Maine's Olympia Snowe helped
to scuttle even a single-year extension of the current 15% tax
rate on dividends and capital gains that is due to expire in
2008. Senate Finance Chairman Chuck Grassley was thus forced to
postpone a committee vote on extending a tax cut that has been
crucial to an economic rebound that since mid-2003 has been
marked by 10-straight quarters of nearly 4% average growth. Tell
us again why Republicans need 55 Senators.
Ukraine
preparing to quit Iraq (RIA Novosti)
Ukraine will withdraw most of its military contingent from Iraq,
leaving about 50 troops, the country's defense minister said
Thursday. In view of a proposal from the Iraqi government
and coalition leaders, a presidential draft resolution is being
prepared. If it is passed, in 2006 there will be a limited
number of military personnel in Iraq," Anatoliy Hrytsenko said
following his visit to Iraq. The remaining Ukrainian
troops will stay in the country for six months. Ukraine
currently has about 1,000 soldiers posted in Iraq. The
authorities previously announced that the troops would be
withdrawn before the end of 2005.
Terrorists off Somali coast attack more ships - Daniel
Wallis (Reuters)
Somali pirates [Ed.: Muslim terrorists] attacked five
more ships this week after a failed attempt to seize a luxury
liner, in a sharp rise of banditry apparently directed by a
mysterious "mother ship" prowling the Indian Ocean. Most
vessels escaped, but one was commandeered, bringing to nine the
number of vessels being held captive along with their crews by
pirates working the lawless southern section of the failed
state's coastline, Africa's longest. Insecurity off the
Somali coast has escalated sharply," Andrew Mwangura, program
coordinator at the Kenyan Seafarers' Association, told Reuters.
"It is very worrying."
Delaware homeowner defends self from intruders (2nd Amendment
alert) - Al Novack (KYW 1060-AM)
Police in Roswell (New Castle County), Del. are investigating an
overnight break-in at a home that ended in a gunfight between
the home owner and the intruders. Investigators say the
incident began just after midnight at the home on South Woodward
Avenue when the 60-year-old homeowner, who just happens to be a
hunter and a good marksman, heard the men breaking into his
house. He grabbed a gun and decided to investigate. As he
entered the room where the intruders were, they spotted him and
opened fire. The homeowner was not hit, but he returned fire and
hit both intruders, who fled into a nearby wooded area.
|
|
November 10, 2005
(top)
|
West Palm Beach prosecutor admits he's on fishing expedition;
has "no idea if Mr. Limbaugh has completed the elements of any
offense yet" - Susan Spencer-Wendel (Palm Beach Post)
Prosecutors redoubled efforts to talk with
Rush Limbaugh's medical providers, arguing in court Tuesday that
they should be allowed to as part of their doctor-shopping
investigation of the conservative talk-show king.
Attorneys for Limbaugh kicked up their aggressive defense too,
seeking to hold prosecutors in contempt for allegedly leaking
information to the media. Separately, Roy Black, an
attorney for Limbaugh, argued that the confidentiality between a
doctor and patient is a privilege not pierced — even by criminal
investigators. The law requires a waiver from Limbaugh to speak
with his doctors, argued Black, and that was not forthcoming.
"They cannot force Mr. Limbaugh to supply their evidence for
them," Black said. . . . Assistant State Attorney James Martz
argued that he needs to ask basic questions of Limbaugh's
doctors to responsibly investigate if a crime of doctor-shopping
has been committed. . . . "I have no idea if Mr. Limbaugh has
completed the elements of any offense yet... unless we can ask
several pertinent questions."
Curt
Weldon: New info on Able Danger - intelligence and 9/11
commission coverups (Lou Dobbs Tonight, CNN)
Interview of Rep. Curt
Weldon (R-PA), of the House Armed Services Committee,
interviewed by CNN's Lou Dobbs concerning Weldon's ongoing
efforts to investigate the cover-up of Able Danger, a data
mining operation that identified al-Qaeda operative, Mohamad
Atta, as being in the U.S. a year before the attacks of 9/11.
DOBBS: Simply
irrelevant how Slade Gorton describes Able Danger, what's your
reaction? WELDON: Unbelievable. Slade Gorton has never talked to any principle involved with Able Danger. And how he can go off and profess to know something about something that he's never talked to anyone about, is beyond me. Slade Gorton is into what the 9/11 commission is doing, Lou. It's called c, y, a. Cover their butts, pretend it didn't happen. How can you say something is historically insignificant that Louis Freeh just two weeks ago on national TV said Able Danger information was the kind of intelligence that could have prevented the hijackings.
GOP revolting revolt: So-called "moderates" abandoning
conservatism? - Andrew taylor (AP)
House
Republican leaders scuttled a vote Thursday on a $51 billion
budget-cut package in the face of a revolt by moderate lawmakers
over cuts to Medicaid, food stamp and student loan programs.
The episode marked a setback for Republicans on Capitol Hill.
They had hoped to use the budget debate to burnish their
deficit-cutting credentials with the public and their core
political supporters, many of whom are disappointed with their
party's performance on spending. The decision by GOP
leaders came despite a big concession to moderates Wednesday,
when the leaders dropped provisions to open the Arctic National
Refuge to oil and gas exploration, as well as a plan letting
states lift a moratorium on oil drilling off the Atlantic and
Pacific coasts.
Jordanians mount furious protests against al-Zarqawi for
bombings (CNN)
Three terror bombings that killed at least 56 people in Jordan's
capital sparked furious protests against al Qaeda on Thursday
after a Web site carried a claim that the group was behind the
attacks. Jordanians flooded Amman blaring car horns and
waving the nation's flag to protest the suicide attacks at three
hotels with Western connections. Hundreds of angry
Jordanians rallied, shouting, "Burn in hell, Abu Musab
al-Zarqawi!" after the claim of responsibility was posted.
Judith Miller's farewell - Judy Miller (New York Times)
To the Editor: On July 6 I chose to go to jail to defend my
right as a journalist to protect a confidential source, the same
right that enables lawyers to grant confidentiality to their
clients, clergy to their parishioners, and physicians and
psychotherapists to their patients. Though 49 states have
extended this privilege to journalists as well, for without such
protection a free press cannot exist, there is no comparable
federal law. I chose to go to jail not only to honor my pledge
of confidentiality, but also to dramatize the need for such a
federal law. After 85 days, more than twice as long as any other
American journalist has ever spent in jail for this cause, I
agreed to testify before the special prosecutor Patrick J.
Fitzgerald's grand jury about my conversations with my source,
I. Lewis Libby Jr. I did so only after my two conditions were
met: first, that Mr. Libby voluntarily relieve me in writing and
by phone of my promise to protect our conversations; and second,
that the special prosecutor limit his questions only to those
germane to the Valerie Plame Wilson case.
Political
castration; GOP drops ANWR drilling provision from budget bill
(AP)
House leaders late Wednesday abandoned an attempt to push
through a hotly contested plan to open an Alaskan wildlife
refuge to oil drilling, fearing it would jeopardize approval of
a sweeping budget bill Thursday. They also dropped from
the budget document plans to allow states to authorize oil and
gas drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts — regions
currently under a drilling moratorium. . . . The decision to
drop the ANWR drilling language came after GOP moderates said
they would oppose the budget if it was kept in the bill. The
offshore drilling provision was also viewed as too contentious
and a threat to the bill, especially in the Senate.
Texas strangulation killer put to death for 1993 slaying -
Zeke Minaya (Houston Chronicle)
Charles Daniel Thacker, convicted of fatally choking a
schoolteacher during an attempted sexual assault, was executed
Wednesday. Thacker, strapped onto a gurney and in a
slightly quivering voice, thanked his two witnesses, volunteer
prison ministers. "Jack and Irene, I love you guys. Tell my
family I love them. I am sorry for the things I have done. I
know God will forgive me." Thacker did not acknowledge the
only witness for the victim, the brother of Karen Crawford, who
died two days after the attack in April 1993. Steve Crawford, of
Illinois, at times looked away during the procedure.
Levees investigation: Pilings shorter than designed, much
shorter than needed - Bob Marshall (Times-Picayune)
Sheet piling supporting the failed floodwall on the 17th Street
Canal extends just 10 feet below sea level, 7 feet shorter than
the Corps of Engineers has maintained, a team of investigators
said Wednesday, strengthening earlier findings that faulty
design and construction played a role in the canal breaches that
flooded much of New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina. An
LSU forensic engineering team, working in conjunction with the
state attorney general's office, began examining the levee
foundation with ground sonar Wednesday. The first reading was
taken about 150 yards south of the break that allowed water from
Lake Pontchartrain to inundate the city. . . . Soil borings the
corps consulted as it designed the walls in the early 1990s
indicated pilings would have to be driven at least 40 to 50 feet
deep before reaching soil strong enough to support the wall,
investigators have said.
Criminal probe launched into faulty design and construction of
New Orleans levees (AP)
Federal
prosecutors are conducting a criminal investigation into the
levee failures that swamped New Orleans, looking into the
possibility of corruption in the design, construction and
maintenance of the flood barriers. U.S. Attorney Jim
Letten said Wednesday that his office began the investigation
the week after Hurricane Katrina. "The scope of our
interest is very broad," he said.
French riots: A gift from the open borders lobby - Kamal
Nawash (FrontPageMagazine.com)
For the last two weeks,
France has experienced riots the likes of which it has not seen
in decades. In terms of destruction, the unrest is France's
worst since World War II.
More than a thousand cars
have been burned along with several buildings and hundreds have
been arrested. For the most part, the riots are being carried
out by the children of poor immigrants most of whom are Muslim.
Since the riots began,
many have given their two cents as to why France is burning.
Some say this is a result of years of discrimination and
deprivation, some say the riots are a function of a jihad
whereby Muslims are trying to turn Europe into a Muslim
continent, and yet others conclude that the riots are a function
of decades of failed policies by France and other Western
Nations.
While there is no one
cause for the French riots, none of the "experts" have
considered decades of failed immigration policies as the cause
of the riots.
Australia to Muslims: You want Islamic law? Then get out (AAP)
Treasurer Peter Costello said radical Muslims would not be
allowed to turn Australia into an Islamic state. Mr
Costello said Muslims who wanted to live in a country governed
by sharia law, which imposes strict limitations on freedoms,
would be better off living elsewhere. "If you are somebody
who wants to live in an Islamic state governed by sharia law you
are not going to be happy in Australia, because Australia is not
an Islamic state, will never be an Islamic state and will never
be governed by sharia law," Mr Costello said.
France
to deport foreign rioters (BBC News)
Interior minister Nicolas Sarkozy has ordered the expulsion of
all foreigners convicted of taking part in the riots that have
swept France for 13 nights. He told parliament 120
foreigners had been found guilty of involvement and would be
deported without delay. Police said overnight violence had
fallen significantly - although trouble still flared in more
than 100 towns. . . . Mr Sarkozy told MPs that non-French
nationals - "not all of whom are here illegally" - had been
convicted of taking part in the attacks. "I have asked the
prefects to deport them from our national territory without
delay, including those who have a residency visa," he said.
|
|
November 9, 2005
(top)
|
Judy
Miller out at the New York Times
(SeanRobins.com)
Veteran reporter, Judith
Miller, and the New York Times,
today announced
that she will be leaving her job at the paper after twenty-eight
years. Talk had abounded since her September 29th release
from an almost three-month stay in federal prison--over her
refusal to disclose that I. Louis "Scooter" Libby had been her
source for information about Valerie Plame's identity as a CIA
employee--that the rift that had been developing between her and
the Times had become fatal. The claim today that
the terms of her "agreement" were amicable is at odds with the
vituperative outward appearances that have foreshadowed Miller's
departure. Miller's three month incarceration, and
subsequent almost sudden change of heart and cooperation with
Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation, have left many of her
colleagues scratching their heads, asking what it was all about.
Many at the paper have felt a sense of betrayal at having
staunchly supported Miller in "protecting" her source, only to
have the rug pulled out at the last moment, without an
understanding of what it was in aid of after all. After
spending three months in jail, obtaining an explicit waiver from
Mr. Libby to discuss their conversations, Ms. Miller ended up
testifying that she could not recall who was the source
of the information about Plame. Miller's "public"
explanation for her "retirement" from the Times--that "I
have become the news, something a New York Times reporter never
wants to be"--seems a bit thin, given the overall circumstances,
and the nasty internal squabbling that has attended Ms. Miller
almost daily at the Times.
Vallely "outs" Wilson on nationaol television (WorldNetDaily.com)
Calling it "a potentially explosive development in the CIA leak
investigation," Fox News analysts Sean Hannity and Alan Colmes
grilled retired Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely tonight about his claim
that Ambassador Joseph Wilson "outed" his wife as a CIA agent in
2002, a year before her identity was exposed by a political
columnist. "There's no personal vendetta here," Vallely
told the pair, "I want to make that clear. It all came about
questioning why the special prosecutor did not include in his
inquiry bring under oath Joe Wilson, Valerie Plame or anybody in
the CIA as far as we know, so the question is out there to be
answered." More==>
Watch the Hannity & Colmes segment with Vallely
Patrick Fitsgerald ignored witnesses who contradicted Wilson
(NewsMax.com)
Special Counsel Patrick
Fitzgerald's Leakgate investigation is coming unraveled, as
witness after witness steps forward to challenge a key premise
of his controversial probe. Was the identity of Joseph
Wilson's wife Valerie Plame really a deep dark secret before she
was "outed" by columnist Robert Novak in July 2003? The
number of witnesses now saying "No" has climbed to four - and
none of them have apparently been interviewed by Fitzgerald's
investigators.
Of
pardons and coincidences
(SeanRobins.com)
Democratic Senator Harry Reid and his gang of irrelevants have
lobbed a pre-emptive strike against the possibility that
President Bush (how dare he) might pardon I. Louis
"Scooter" Libby in the event that he is convicted on any of the
five counts of the recent indictment. Reid has
"challenged" the president to commit to not pardoning
Libby, and has also demanded that Bush state publicly whether
anyone from the White House has even discussed the topic.
Leaving aside the contemptible nerve that such demands exhibit,
and the fact that the pardon power bestowed upon the Executive
by the Constitution is utterly beyond review by any
authority--has everyone simply forgotten the
140 eleventh-hour pardons
Bill Clinton inked on his last morning in office as he slinked
out the back door? (More on the Clinton pardons in an
upcoming post. . .and on the despicable braying of Harry
don't-pardon-me Reid.) Today's interesting tidbit,
however, is an amazing little coincidence. Reid &
Co.--Democrats--are demanding that President Bush not pardon
Libby. The biggest pardoner in recent memory--about whom
no Democrat ever complained--was, of course, Bill Clinton.
Among the worst of the worst of those pardoned by Clinton, was
billionaire financier, Mark Rich who, prosecuted on tax charges,
fled the country. Guess who represented Rich from
1985-2000, while he was "on the lam" because of the tax
prosecution? None other than
"Scooter" Libby.
An interesting little circle of political life, which brings the
Dems face-to-face with the man who represented Bill Clinton's
most notorious "pardonee." As to the Rich pardon, the Dems
were silent and compliant with their boy Bill's pronouncement.
But as to the man who represented the man who was pardoned by
the Great Pardoner, its too much to bear.
Voters soundly reject election changes in Ohio (AP)
Promoters of four ballot issues that would have changed the way
Ohioans vote took a solid hit on Election Day, but expect the
Legislature to make changes on their own anyway. And one
of the most vocal critics of the issues is ready to accommodate
them. The issues would have opened absentee balloting to
all voters, lowered the cap on individual campaign contributions
and put boards, instead of elected officials, in charge of
drawing legislative and congressional districts and overseeing
the state's elections.
San Franciscans vote to ban handguns and the military (AP)
approved ballot measures to ban
handguns in San Francisco and urge the city's public high
schools and college campuses to keep out military recruiters.
The gun ban prohibits the manufacture and sale of all firearms
and ammunition in the city, and makes it illegal for residents
to keep handguns in their homes or businesses. Only two
other major U.S. cities - Washington and Chicago - have
implemented such sweeping handgun bans.
|
|
November 8, 2005
(top)
|
Congressional and criminal probes into Washington Post CIA security leak
announced
(SeanRobins.com)
As first noted in our
November 4th story,
an in-depth
Washington Post
article, published two days earlier, revealed the existence and
possible locations of a highly classified series of CIA prison
facilities around the globe, sites where the "highest value"
targets in the war on terror are housed. Today, GOP
leaders in both the House and the Senate announced plans to
commence an investigation into the leak of the highly-classified
information through Ms. Priest and the Post. Senate
Majority Leader Bill Frist, and House Speaker Dennis Hastert,
send a written request to the Senate and House Intelligence
Committees, seeking a bicameral investigation into such
"damaging and dangerous" leaks of classified information
as embodied in the Post account, to determine the source
of the leaks, and take appropriate legal action. It has
been suggested that leaks of classified information such as this one,
which have been alarmingly frequent since 2001, may be
politically motivated "payback" by career insiders who are
bitterly opposed to changes sought by the administration.
It was also revealed today by officials that the CIA general
counsel has set the wheels in motion for a possible criminal
investigation by forwarding a report to the Justice Department
concerning the Post's story. Almost immediately
following the announcement by Frist and Hastert, Democratic
leaders began their standard practice of politicizing the
matter, by making irrelated demands concerning the already
thrice-investigated pre-war intelligence issues. More
==>
Read the First-Hastert letter
Latest
NJ governor polls
(SeanRobins.com)
With the race for New Jersey
governor in its final hours, the lead held by Democratic Senator
John Corzine has contracted to no more than five points, in two
of the final polls issued on this last full campaign day.
Both the
Marist and
Rasmussen polls
put Corzine at +5 points over Republican candidate, Doug
Forrester. Marist has Corzine at 51-46%, and Rasmussen
gives the Democrat 39% to Forrester's 44%. Five
points represents Corzine's smallest lead in the Rasmussen poll,
in which at his peak, Corzine led Forrester by as much as 12
points in July. The last two weeks has seen particularly
effective tv and radio spots by the Forrester campaign, one in
which Forrester's wife asks voters to look past the falsehoods
being told by Corzine; and the other in which Corzine's
ex-wife warns New Jersians that as Corzine let his family down,
so too would he let New Jersey down. (Corzine left his
wife and family shortly after his 2002 election to the U.S.
Senate, and is believed to have engaged in affairs with one and
perhaps two women.) In a scandal-ridden state with few
equals, New Jersey remains a liberal bastion, but one in which
Republicans such as Forrester have begun making significant
inroads.
Vallely demands apology from Wilson - Art Moore (WorldNetDaily)
Threatened with a lawsuit for "slander," retired Maj. Gen. Paul
Vallely is turning the tables on Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson,
calling on the man at the center of the CIA leak controversy to
offer a public apology for accusing him of lying. As
WorldNetDaily reported, Vallely claimed Wilson revealed wife
Valerie Plame's employment with the CIA to him in a casual
conversation the year before she allegedly was "outed" by
columnist Robert Novak. Vallely said he brought up
Wilson's disclosure last week because he saw Special Counsel
Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation of the alleged leak as
unfinished.
French officials continue battle insurrection with half measures
(AP)
President
Jacques Chirac declared a 12-day state of emergency Tuesday,
paving the way for curfews to be imposed on riot-hit cities and
towns in an extraordinary measure to halt France's worst civil
unrest in nearly four decades. Meanwhile, police said the
nightly rioting that began Oct. 27 ago was showing signs of
abating. "The intensity of this violence is on the way
down," National Police Chief Michel Gaudin said, citing fewer
attacks on public buildings and fewer direct clashes between
youths and police. He said rioting was reported in 226 towns
across France, compared with nearly 300 the night before. . . .
Curfew violators face up to two months imprisonment and a $4,400
fine, the justice ministry said. Minors face one month in jail.
Discredited ex-CBS producer, Mapes: Still on the story -
Brian Ross (ABC News)
In her first interview since being fired, former CBS News
producer Mary Mapes maintains that her controversial "60 Minutes
II" story on President Bush's National Guard service was "true"
and that "no one has proved that the documents were not
authentic." Mapes was fired after an independent panel
found her basic reporting was "faulty." In her interview
with ABC News chief investigative correspondent Brian Ross, to
be broadcast Wednesday morning on "Good Morning America," Mapes
says she is unrepentant about her role. "I don't think I
committed bad journalism. I really don't," she says.
Poor petit babies: French feelings hurt by news coverage (Reuters)
A barrage of critical world media reporting on the violence in
its rundown suburbs is rubbing nerves raw in France, which is
more used to hearing praise for its food, its countryside and
its opposition to the Iraq war. In tones ranging from
outrage to rueful agreement, French media are now reporting
daily on the harsh terms that foreign television stations and
newspapers choose to describe the unrest among France's angry
youths of Arab and African origin. France laughed off
"freedom fries" -- as French fries were renamed in Washington --
and other anti-French sentiment in the United States at the
start of the Iraq war in 2003, but its reaction to the riot
reporting carries a between-the-lines admission of hurt pride.
French P.M. threatens curfews and arrests - Susan Bell (The
Scotsman)
Dominique de Villepin, the French prime minister, said last
night curfews would be enforced wherever they were needed to
quell the riots on the streets of France, hours after it emerged
the violence had claimed its first fatality. The country's
worst civil unrest in decades continued for a 12th night, as
rioters in the southern city of Toulouse set fire to a bus after
sundown and pelted police with petrol bombs and stones. . . .
With no sign of the violence abating, Mr de Villepin said
curfews would be used and 9,500 police officers and gendarmes
deployed to stop the rioting, which has spread across France.
"Wherever it is necessary, prefects will be able to put in place
a curfew under the authority of the interior minister, if they
think it will be useful to permit a return to calm and ensure
the protection of residents. That is our number-one
responsibility," Mr de Villepin said last night.
Roots of a riot: France reaps what it sows (Manchester
(N.H.) Union Leader)
France has riots all the time, but seldom like this one. Whether
it is the beginning of a widespread conflict between Muslim
immigrants and native Europeans remains to be seen, but it
certainly traces back to the way France has treated these
immigrants and their children. The failure of France to
assimilate these immigrants and their descendants is obvious.
French culture tells these people in no uncertain terms, "You
will never beFrench." That's a great way to create a
permanent, hostile underclass.
Leaders fiddle as France burns - Colin Randall (U.K.
Telegraph)
France was struggling to overcome one of its gravest post-war
crises last night as every major city faced the threat of fierce
rioting that began 12 nights ago and now seems to have spun out
of control. Despite an assurance
from Philippe Douste Blazy, the foreign minister, that France
was "not a dangerous country", the spread of violence prompted
the Foreign Office in London to warn travellers that trouble
could break out "almost anywhere". Dominique de Villepin, the
beleaguered prime minister, announced that officials in riot-hit
areas would be authorised to impose late-night curfews "wherever
it is necessary" in a bid to halt the disturbances.
Paris burning: How empires end - Patrick J. Buchanan (Human
Events)
The Romans conquered the barbarians—and the barbarians conquered
Rome. So it goes with empires. And comes now the
penultimate chapter in the history of the empires of the West.
This is the larger meaning of the ritual murder of Theo Van Gogh
in Holland, the subway bombings in London, the train bombings in
Madrid, the Paris riots spreading across France. The
perpetrators of these crimes in the capitals of Europe are the
children of immigrants who were once the colonial subjects of
the European empires. At this writing, the riots are
entering their 12th night and have spread to Rouen, Lille,
Marseille, Toulouse, Dijon, Bordeaux, Strasbourg, Cannes, Nice.
Thousands of cars and buses have been torched and several
nursery schools fire-bombed. One fleeing and terrified woman
was doused with gasoline and set ablaze.
Beware a "Digital Munich" - Norm Coleman (Wall Street
Journal)
It sounds like a Tom
Clancy plot. An anonymous group of international technocrats
holds secretive meetings in Geneva. Their cover story: devising
a blueprint to help the developing world more fully participate
in the digital revolution. Their real mission: strategizing to
take over management of the Internet from the U.S. and enable
the United Nations to dominate and politicize the World Wide
Web. Does it sound too bizarre to be true? Regrettably, much of
what emanates these days from the U.N. does. The Internet
faces a grave threat. We must defend it. We need to preserve
this unprecedented communications and informational medium,
which fosters freedom and enterprise. We can not allow the U.N.
to control the Internet.
|
|
November 7, 2005
(top)
|
Paris police fear rioters' heavy arms - Jennifer Joan Lee (Washington
Times)
Police officers, exhausted and dispirited after 11 nights of
street battles, say their mainly young African and Arab
adversaries have access to sophisticated weapons including
grenades and could soon begin using them. A dozen officers
were injured, two of them seriously, after being shot with
hunting rifles fitted with lead pellets during rioting last
night in the suburb of Grigny, south of Paris, police said.
Jean-Christophe Carne, president of a police trade union, told
The Washington Times before last night's outbreak that police
officers were increasingly pessimistic that civic order would be
restored anytime soon.
Frustrated Fitzgerald used Libby to justify fruitless probe
- Donald Lambro (Human Events)
Is it possible there is less to special prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald’s CIA leak investigation than anyone is willing to
admit? From the beginning, conventional wisdom said that
laws prohibiting the outing of intelligence agents were broken
and that White House officials told reporters the wife of former
Ambassador Joseph Wilson—who criticized the intelligence used to
justify the Iraq invasion—worked for the CIA in an effort to
punish him. But after two years of exhaustive
investigation, Fitzgerald couldn’t find evidence of any
top-level grand conspiracy “to lie” us into war. The special
prosecutor’s case has come down to this: I. Lewis “Scooter”
Libby, a senior aide to Vice President Dick Cheney, allegedly
lied about his recollections of a number of conversations with
several reporters.
Michael Steele
calls critics racist (NewsMax.com)
Michael Steele wishes Maryland
Democrats would live up to Martin Luther King’s standard of
judging people by their character and not the color of their
skin. Steele, currently Maryland’s Lieutenant Governor and
a black Republican running for the United States Senate to fill
the seat to be vacated by Sen. Paul Sarbanes, has been the
victim of multiple slanders by Democratic politicians and
activists in Maryland.
French Founding principle called into question - Jon Henley
(U.K. Guardian)
The government cannot
admit it, but more and more voices in France are being raised to
say that the country's worst urban unrest since the student
uprising of 1968 reflects the failure of a whole model.
"The crisis is total," one leading sociologist, Michel Wievorka,
said yesterday. "This is a structural problem that neither the
right nor the left have dealt with for 25 years. France cannot
cope with the shortcomings of its republican model. The whole
system needs to be rethought." The modčle républicain
d'intégration is based on perhaps the most sacred article of all
France's grand republican creed: that everyone is equal and
indistinguishable in the eyes of the state. No matter where they
come from, all French citizens are identical in their
Frenchness.
The wrong argument, at the wrong place, at the wrong time -
David Horowitz & Ben Johnson (FrontPageMagazine.com)
False charges that presidents lied us into war
are nothing new, nor are
the recriminations leveled against President Bush’s Iraq war the
most outrageous on record. The toxic allegation that FDR knew
about Pearl Harbor in advance and deliberately allowed the
Japanese to destroy the Pacific fleet to get reluctant Americans
to join the war was the subject of a congressional investigation
at the time, the subject of a book by America's leading
historian Charles Beard (President Roosevelt and the Coming
of the War) and wild accusations by Clare Boothe Luce and
others. Recent scholars
like John Toland and Robert Stinnett have repeated the
charges. Today, these are generally regard as fringe
accusations just as the left's present mania will seem as such
when future generations look back on the conspiracy-theorist
opponents of the war for freedom in Iraq.
Naturally, the evidence
weighs against the Pearl Harbor conspiracy theory, but even
if it were true would it change one iota the way Americans feel
having gone to war against the fascist Axis? Americans would not
demand we apologize to Emperor Hirohito, nor question the way we
imposed constitutional democracy on the Axis powers after a
prolonged (and bloody) military conflict and years of
occupation.
France's intifada - Phyllis Chesler (FrontPageMagazine.com)
In 1973, the French
novelist Jean Raspail artfully predicted in the form of fiction
the very real Palestinian-style intifada that now rages on
the west bank of Europe:
France. Ten years after the
book's publication, Raspail described the "vision" he had,
portrayed in the book, which lasted for ten feverish months:
"They were there! A
million poor wretches, armed only with their weakness and their
numbers, overwhelmed by misery, encumbered with starving brown
and black children, ready to disembark on our soil, the vanguard
of the multititudes pressing hard against every part of the
tired and overfed West. I literally saw them, saw the major
problem they presented, a problem absolutely insoluble by our
present moral standards. To let them in would destroy us. To
reject them would destroy them."
French riots spread to 300 towns - Angela Doland (AP)
Rioting by
French youths spread to 300 towns overnight, and a 61-year- old
man hurt in the violence died of his wounds, the first fatality
in 11 days of unrest that has shocked the country, police said
Monday. After sundown, rioters in the southern French city
of Toulouse set fire to a bus, then pelted police with Molotov
cocktails and rocks, a local official said. The rioters
stopped the bus and ordered the driver to step out, then set the
vehicle afire, said Francis Soutric, chief of staff at the
regional prefecture in Toulouse. No passengers were inside.
Clashes broke out when riot police arrived on the scene, and
officers responded with tear gas bombs, he said.
Newspaper circulation bloodletting accelerates; SF Chronicle
in freefall, down over 16% - Seth Sutel (AP)
Average
weekday circulation at U.S. newspapers fell 2.6 percent during
the six month-period ending in September in the latest sign of
trouble in the newspaper business, an industry group reported
Monday. Sunday circulation also fell 3.1 percent at
newspapers reporting to the Audit Bureau of Circulations,
according to an analysis of the data by the Newspaper
Association of America. The declines show an acceleration
of a years-long trend of falling circulation at daily newspapers
as more people, especially young adults, turn to the Internet
for news and as newspapers cut back on less profitable
circulation. More ==>
Audit Bureau
Top 20 List
Should Bush fire Rove? (Of course not) - William Kristol (Weekly
Standard)
Last Friday, a memo to White House staffers was issued (and
released to reporters): Time to go back to class! All White
House staffers with security clearances were instructed by the
president to attend ethics briefings, including on "the rules
governing the protection of classified information," beginning
this week. A senior White House aide told the Washington Post
that the decision was arrived at in a meeting involving the
president, chief of staff Andrew Card, and White House counsel
Harriet Miers, who will be conducting the mandatory classes.
Also on Friday, the president refused to comment on deputy chief
of staff Karl Rove's future, pending the outcome of what he
called "a very serious" and "important" investigation by special
counsel Patrick Fitzgerald.
Radical Islam fanning French riots - Eve Torjman (Jerusalem
Post)
Rioting French Muslims' violence may "remind
us of the intifada," but anti-Semitism does not appear to be
playing a key part in the current riots, according to Yves
Azeroual, editor of the Tribune Juive. He added
that an attack on a synagogue in Pierrefitte outside Paris was
simply part of general rioting. "This isn't connected to
anti-Semitism. No one has brought up the Jews as an issue, so
for now, it's not an issue for Jews," said Azeroual, who arrived
Sunday and witnessed the violence in the Paris suburbs.
Russert
joins Bush-haters; participates in blatant propaganda (Oregon
Magazine)
It started with (hurricane) Katrina," he said to the early
morning NBC anchor. Then, according to Tim, there were the
problems with the CIA agent leak. Added to the truthfulness
problems about WMD which Bush used to justify our attack on
Iraq, it explains why the Bush White House is in trouble, with
job disapproval/trust ratings in the negative sixty percent
range. Before he left office -- in fact, if memory serves,
on the day he was impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives
-- Bill Clinton sent missles to bomb Baghdad. Of late, those
who recall that sort of thing have been researching poltical
speech by famous liberals from Clinton to Kerry, and have
located literally dozens of examples of claims by Democrats that
Hussein was working on weapons of mass destruction. The irony
here is that in the speech where Bush made that claim, he
didn't. What he actually said was that he couldn't wait until
the possibility became a virtual near-term certainty. We had, he
said, to attack before the risk became a reality. Before, not
after.
|
|
November 6, 2005
(top)
|
Pssst, Jacques. .
.Time to call in the U.N.
(SeanRobins.com)
Its
difficult to know precisely how to react to the growing French
riots, which appear to be sweeping across that nation. The
main stream media, ever quick to point the finger at the
police--or the military, or any authority figure that is
handy--was all agog at the event that seems to have served as
the excuse (some would say "catalyst," but I wouldn't), the
electrocution of two young men who broke their way into some
power substation or other.
The media immediately attributed their deaths to their need to
flee the police. Then, when there didn't appear to be any
evidence that police were actually chasing them, the media
changed the story: the boys had been stopped in one of France's
routine and notorious identity checks, and felt it best to beat
it. (Could it be that they were "illegal" immigrants in
France? Hardly seems likely in a country which exercises
even less judiciousness over the incoming hoards than even
Canada does.)
More-->
John Corzine:
Did affair with staffer lead to abortion? - Matt Drudge (DrudgeReport.com)
New Jersey Public Radio & Television aired a report Friday night
in which New Jersey Democratic Candidate for Governor Jon
Corzine was grilled about whether a staffer he allegedly had an
affair with -- had an abortion. NJN News’ Michael Aron
reported Friday: “The press is interested right now in personal
conduct. Corzine was asked about a persistent rumor that he had
an affair with a staffer whom the reporter identified by name."
Investigate the CIA: Plame's "outing" was the result of either
incompetence or an effort to undermine the White House -
Victoria Toensing (OpinionJournal.com)
In a surprise, closed-door debate, Senate Democrats last week
demanded an investigation of pre-Iraq War intelligence. Here's
an issue for them: Assess the validity of the claim that Valerie
Plame's status was "covert," or even properly classified, given
the wretched tradecraft by the Central Intelligence Agency
throughout the entire episode. It was, after all, the CIA that
requested the "leak" investigation, alleging that one of its
agents had been outed in Bob Novak's July 14, 2003, column. Yet
it was the CIA's bizarre conduct that led inexorably to Ms.
Plame's unveiling. When the Intelligence Identities Protection
Act was being negotiated, Senate Select Committee Chairman Barry
Goldwater was adamant: If the CIA desired a law making it
illegal to expose one of its deep cover employees, then the
agency must do a much better job of protecting their cover. That
is why a criterion for any prosecution under the act is that the
government was taking "affirmative measures" to conceal the
protected person's relationship to the intelligence agency. Two
decades later, the CIA, either purposely or with gross
negligence, made a series of decisions that led to Ms. Plame
becoming a household name.
Former U.S. Army general, Paul Vallely, says Joe Wilson "outted"
his own wife in 2002 - Art Moore (WorldNetDaily.com)
A retired Army general says the man at the center of the CIA
leak controversy, Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson, revealed his wife
Valerie Plame's employment with the agency in a casual
conversation more than a year before she allegedly was "outed"
by the White House through a columnist. Maj. Gen. Paul
Vallely told WorldNetDaily that Wilson mentioned Plame's status
as a CIA employee over the course of at least three, possibly
five, conversations in 2002 in the Fox News Channel's "green
room" in Washington, D.C., as they waited to appear on air as
analysts.
Wilson and lawyers demand Vallely retract assertion that he
"outted" his wife in 2002 - Joseph Farah and Art Moore (WorldNetDaily.com)
Ambassador Joseph Wilson's attorney is demanding Maj. Gen. Paul
Vallely retract a statement he made to WND that the man at the
center of the CIA leak case "outed" his own wife as a CIA
employee in conversations more than a year before her identity
was revealed in a syndicated column. A demand letter was
sent by Christopher Wolf, partner at Proskauer Rose LLP and
counsel for Wilson, to both Vallely and WND tonight. It
disputes Vallely's claim that Wilson mentioned Valerie Plame's
status with the CIA in conversations in 2002 in the Fox News
Channel's "green room" in Washington as they waited to appear as
analysts.
Nine Totenberg:
Justice Ginsberg "a pretty conservative liberal judge) -
Noel Sheppard (NewsBusters.org)
On NBC’s “Meet The Press” this morning, host Tim Russert stocked
his panel with three left-of-center journalists – Nina Totenberg
of NPR, Ron Brownstein of the Los Angeles Times, and David
Gregory of NBC News – to discuss the events of the week. When
they got to the nomination of Samuel Alito to replace retiring
justice Sandra Day O’Connor, Russert mentioned that when Bill
Clinton was president, both Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen
Breyer, despite obvious Liberal leanings, were approved by a
strong majority of both Democrats and Republicans. “And they
say, ‘Why can't we have the same courtesy to conservative
jurists under President Bush?'" In response, Totenberg
said: “If you look at the Ginsburg nomination, for example,
she'd been a judge, I think, for 12 years. She'd been,
actually, a pretty conservative liberal judge, if you can be
such a thing.” This could be the first time that anyone has
referred to the former general counsel for the American Civil
Liberties Union as being “pretty conservative."
French
rioting worsens; 1,300 cars torched, 300 arrested on 10th night
(AFP)
Arsonists torched 1,300 cars and police arrested 300 people
across France as the urban violence which has rocked the country
for 10 nights reached a new peak. Police deployed
helicopters and stepped up their arrests of youths responsible
for the street violence, as troubles flared for the 10th
consecutive night in suburbs around Paris on Saturday and spread
to other French cities.
The mystery of the
NBC zombies; plus, has Russert caved? - Mickey Kaus (Slate.com)
The Mystery of the NBC Zombies:
When you think about it, isn't it
a bit incredible that NBC could go through an entire Meet
the Press episode about the Libby case, and a whole CNBC
show, and innumerable newscasts, telling its viewers that in a
crucial conversation Libby had called NBC's Tim Russert
"complaining about a report he had been watching on MSNBC"
without, as far as I can see,
telling its viewers the extremely relevant information that the
MSNBC report in question was about Joseph Wilson and his
trip to Niger, if that's in fact what it was about
(something that the NYT, among others, has suggested)?
If it was about Wilson, after all, that makes it much
more plausible that Libby and Russert at least came close to
talking about Wilson's wife's role in arranging the Niger trip.
The best election Corzine can buy - George Will (RealClearPolitics.com)
Sen. Jon Corzine,
the New Jersey Democrat, brings his characteristic grandiosity
even to his buyer's remorse. In 2000, the former chairman of
Goldman Sachs pulled $60.2 million from his wallet to buy a U.S.
Senate seat. But just four years after the most expensive Senate
campaign in American history, he decided to escape from that
seat -- for which he paid $27,489.03 a day, prorated over six
years -- and try to become governor. His Senate
colleagues, their feelings injured, may wonder, ``Was it
something we said?'' New Jersey should wonder whether some
future Corzine whim might make him flee from Trenton, the
pleasures of which might pall on someone of his restless
ambitiousness.
For NY City Democrats, a grim future could last long
beyond Tuesday - Patrick D. Healy (New York Times)
As Democrats pursue an uphill battle to recapture City Hall on
Tuesday, this year's mayoral campaign has already exposed the
long-term fracturing of Democratic power in the city, from
splinters in the black and Hispanic vote to defections in
liberal bastions like the West Side. Mayor Michael R.
Bloomberg's popularity and his $66 million in campaign spending
are two pressure points as the campaign winds into its final
phase this weekend. Yet it is the permanent structural changes
in New York politics - such as term limits, campaign finance
reforms and evolving demographics - that are really shaking the
once-dominant party and seem bound to hamper it for years to
come, leading Democrats and political consultants say.
Its
"jihad," say some of spreading French riots - Christopher
Dickey (Newsweek)
Word of the deaths spread quickly through Clichy-sous-Bois, a
grim collection of housing projects an hour by train and bus
from the center of Paris. Two teenage boys had been electrocuted
while trying to hide near a transformer the night of Oct. 27.
Rumor said they were running from police. Soon, dozens of angry
young men came from the soulless high-rises looking for cops to
fight and cars to burn on streets named, as it happens, after
heroes of French culture: boulevard Emile Zola, allee Albert
Camus, rue Picasso. Dead white men. "It's Baghdad here," the
rioters shouted. Night after night last week, rage spread
through the ghettos that ring Paris, then beyond to every corner
of France. When a tear-gas canister exploded near a mosque in
Clichy-sous-Bois on the fourth violent evening, a new cry went
up. "Now this is war," said one of the vandals. Others cried
"jihad."
Rioters now targeting police, in expanding French violence (Reuters)
Rioters fired shots at police in an 11th night of riots in
France on Sunday, injuring 10 policemen, two of them seriously,
police said. Some 200 youths were lobbing stones and other
objects at police in Grigny, south of Paris, a police spokesman
said, adding that some of the rioters had fired at officers with
shotguns, hitting 10 policemen. Two officers were being
treated in hospital, one with lead shot wounds to the throat,
the other with wounds to a leg, . . . "The Republic
is quite determined, by definition, to be stronger than those
who want to sow violence or fear," Chirac said after a domestic
security council met to respond to the violence in which
thousands of cars have gone up in flames.
Ex-Marine, Massey, concocted web of lies about Iraq "atrocities"
- Ron Harris (St. Louis Post-Dispatch)
For more than a year, former Marine Staff Sgt. Jimmy Massey has
been telling anybody who would listen about the atrocities that
he and other Marines committed in Iraq. In scores of
newspaper, magazine and broadcast stories, at a Canadian
immigration hearing and in numerous speeches across the country,
Massey told how he and other Marines recklessly, sometimes
intentionally killed dozens of innocent Iraqi civilians. . . .
News organizations worldwide published or broadcast Massey's
claims without any corroboration and in most cases without
investigation. Outside of the Marines, almost no one has
seriously questioned whether Massey, a 12-year veteran who was
honorably discharged, was telling the truth. He wasn't.
L.A. Times: Volcker caved to Annan pressure to reword report
about son (Web India)
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan had asked Paul Volker, probing
the scam in Iraq's oil-for-food programme, to change the
language about the business dealings of his son as he thought it
could force his father's resignation. The UN Chief and his
lawyer asked Mr Volcker to change the words about the business
of Kojo Annan just hours before the publication of the draft in
September, the Los Angeles Times reported. He agreed as he
thought it was merely a part of the due process, the daily
quoted him as saying.
Ten in a row: Worst
night yet for France (AFP)
Arsonists torched 1,300 cars and police arrested 300 people
across France as the urban violence which has rocked the country
for 10 nights reached a new peak. Police deployed
helicopters and stepped up their arrests of youths responsible
for the street violence, as troubles flared for the 10th
consecutive night in suburbs around Paris on Saturday and spread
to other French cities. . . . The disorder also
spilled into central Paris itself, where a petrol bomb set
alight four cars near a major square, Place de la Republique,
while half a dozen vehicles went up in smoke in the northwest
17th arrondissement, or district/ Despite calls for calm
Saturday, 1,295 cars were torched overnight compared with 897
the previous night, while arrests totalled 312 up from 253.
Hillary Clinton supports burning of ties to fuel electric
generators - Darren M. Allen (Rutland Herald)
If New York environmental officials choose to disregard
Vermont's opposition to plans by International Paper Co. to burn
up to 72 tons of shredded tires at its Ticonderoga, N.Y., paper
mill for a two-week test, Vermont will likely take the matter to
court. Gov. James Douglas and his administration, in
cooperation with the Vermont Attorney General's Office, are
prepared to exercise every legal avenue at their disposal, the
governor's press secretary said last week. "Gov. Douglas
has asked the Agency of Administration to include a substantial
appropriation in the fiscal year 2006 budget act for the sole
purpose of pursuing our legal options in opposition to the
potentially toxic tire burn," Jason Gibbs said.
French riots reach Paris city (CNN)
Protesters in France expanded their arson rampage into the
capital city of Paris and along Mediterranean resort communities
as the nation's Interior Ministry predicted the violence would
grow by daybreak Sunday. Police helicopters flew over
Paris and other locations in an effort to identify and stop the
vandals, French radio said. The latest violence, sparked
by the deaths of two teenagers in suburban Paris, spread west to
the Normandy region and south to the Mediterranean. In the
resort cities of Cannes and Nice, where arson was reported.
Evidence of Detroit voter fraud; City clerk stripped of absentee
voter duties (WDIV-TV)
A judge ruled Friday afternoon that City Clerk Jackie Currie
would be replaced as head of Detroit's absentee voter program.
The ruling followed testimony from Secretary of State election
monitor Susan McRill, who said she discovered evidence of voter
fraud. Judge Mary Beth Kelly, of Wayne County Circuit
Court, ordered Thursday that McRill and another monitor oversee
Currie and her election workers, or ambassadors, specifically
for the handling of absentee ballots.
McCain: No matter what's at stake, "no torture" (NewsMax.com)
Sen. John McCain said Sunday that
the U.S. was wrong to "torture" al Qaeda 9/11 mastermind Khalid
Shiek Mohammed, saying that torture shouldn't be used against
suspects even if they have extensive knowledge of terrorist
operations planned against the U.S. Asked "if you could
save American lives" by threatening a terrorist like Mohammed
with torture, McCain told "Fox News Sunday": "If you decide to
torture him you probably don't get the right information,
because torture doesn't work."
Press pushes sex charges in wild New Jersey governor's race
(Editor & Publisher)
With the help of reporters and their newspapers, the once-sleepy
New Jersey governor's race turned into one of the seamiest in
memory this weekend. On Friday reporters carried charges of
extramarital affairs back and forth between the two major
candidates, Sen. John Corzine, the Democrat, and Republican
Douglas Forrester. Both candidates had to rebut
allegations of sexual affairs, a day after the release of a
television commercial that quoted Corzine's ex-wife. She has
accused Corzine of having an affair with an aide, among other
charges. Then Forrester denied he had an extramarital
affair, which was reported in a New York Daily News gossip
column that attributed the allegation to an e-mail it received.
Voters need 3rd (and 4th) options - Tammy Paolino (Courier
Post)
If ever there was a time to reconsider this nation's two-party
system, the lackluster race between gubernatorial candidates Jon
Corzine and Doug Forrester is it. Many people I've talked
to in the weeks running up to Tuesday's election have either
said they are still undecided or they have reluctantly settled
on the candidate they feel is "the lesser of two evils."
Push aside for the moment Corzine's questionable relationship
with an ex-girlfriend union boss and cozy connections with some
of Jersey's big-time Democratic bosses, and disregard for now
Forrester's lack of political experience and less than
progressive record with respect to the health-care crisis.
Dem says Corzine $2.5 million donation quid pro quo-ism -
Charles Webster (Trentonian)
Corzine Donation Alert!: Seems Democrat Jon Corzine dipped into
his back pocket last year and found $2.5 million for the collect
baskets of black churches in New Jersey. Corzine got an
endorsement from the black clergymen who benefited from his
generosity. And It Does Look Good To The Black Community:
"Blatant quid pro quo-ism," Democrat Walter Fields, Jr., former
political director of New Jersey’s NAACP told The First it was
half-million dollar loan to his girlfriend Carla Katz - which he
later forgave after they broke up. Her state workers union
endorsed him. And now it’s $2.5 million in the collection basket
for the endorsement of black clergymen. Johnny Appleseed didn’t
plant this much seed money.
Chris Wallace "hammers" father, Mike Wallace, on media bias on
his show today (NewsMax.com)
"Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace says he "hammered" his
father Mike Wallace on the bias at CBS News during a taped
interview set for broadcast on his own show Sunday morning.
"I hammer my father about the mainstream media," Wallace told
WRKO Boston's Howie Carr on Friday. "I hammer him about Dan
Rather and the fake memos.
|
|
November 5, 2005
(top)
|
From
the Archives: November 5, 2003 - How the Democrats' plot to
sabotage the work of the so-called bi-partisan Senate
Intelligence Committee investigation into pre-war intelligence
came to light . . .
(SeanRobins.com)
Let
us all be careful not to get too caught up in pitying the poor
Senate Democrats, like minority
leader,
Harry Reid, who last Tuesday pulled the "closed door session"
stunt, which he characterized as a last ditch effort to get
somebody, anybody, to listen to their plaintiff pleas to
please get the pre-war intelligence investigation back on
track. "They've done nothing, nothing substantive,"
Harry ranted, obviously having run out of his Thorazine the
previous week.
The session was meaningless, and served only to further
highlight the utter incapacity of the Democratic Party to pursue
an agenda that even the Dems cannot define. It was nothing
more than a cheap parlor trick that fooled just about no one,
not even, astonishingly, the mainstream media, which seemed for
once to understand that this was just nonsense.
More-->
Fight back, Mr. President - William Kristol (Weekly
Standard)
Last week, I suggested that the Bush administration's
second-term bear market had bottomed out. Since then, we've been
pummeled by polls showing Bush in continued decline. Perhaps my
bullish call on Bush was a bit early. Or perhaps it was wrong.
Which is it? That's up to the Bush administration. Over
the next few months, the Bush team will put this bad year behind
them, and regain their footing. Or it will be a long 39
months--a very long 39 months--for Bush and his supporters.
Ex-wife's ad hurts Corzine - Owen Mortiz (New York Daily
News)
Sen. Jon Corzine's ex-wife is campaigning
against him and polls indicate her attack has taken a huge toll
on what was Corzine's 13-point lead in the New Jersey governor's
race. Joanne Corzine, who was divorced from the Democratic
senator in 2002 after 33 years of marriage, was featured in TV
commercials this week saying Corzine "let his family down and
he'll probably let New Jersey down, too." The ads are being run
by Corzine's Republican opponent Doug Forrester.
Behind closed doors - Stephen F. Hayes (Weekly Standard)
When Senate minority leader Harry Reid abruptly took the Senate
into closed session last Tuesday, he sought to portray the move
as a desperate, last-ditch attempt to force intransigent Senate
Republicans to complete the second phase of an investigation
into the use of intelligence before the Iraq war. The procedural
move is rare, one of the few things a minority party can do to
seize the agenda--and the spotlight--from the Senate's majority.
. . . It was not a strong performance. As the session ended,
Reid was asked about a statement from Pat Roberts, the Kansas
Republican who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee. Roberts
had spoken of the work already completed by the Republican staff
on the Intelligence Committee. Reid was dismissive. "They've
done nothing, nothing substantive. And that's been the problem.
Nothing substantive.
French riots: 9 days and counting; spreads through the country
- Jamey Keaten (AP)
Widespread
riots across impoverished areas of France took a malevolent turn
in a ninth night of violence, with youths torching an ambulance
and stoning medical workers coming to the aid of a sick person.
Authorities arrested more than 250 people, an unprecedented
sweep since the beginning of the unrest. Bands of youths
also burned a nursery school, warehouses and nearly 900 cars
overnight as the violence spread from the restive Paris suburbs
to towns around France. The U.S. warned Americans against taking
trains to the airport through the affected areas.
Journalists in Wen Ho Lee case lose again (AP)
A divided federal appeals court for a second time has rejected
four journalists' appeal of a judge's order directing them to
testify about their confidential sources as part of nuclear
scientist Wen Ho Lee's lawsuit against the government. The
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
refused, by a 4-4 vote, to grant a rehearing of the journalists'
case before the full court. A majority of the court's 10 judges
was required to grant a rehearing; two judges recused
themselves.
Some feel McCain "too old" to run in '08 - Robert Novak (TownHall.com)
The January scheduling of Judge Samuel Alito's confirmation
hearings for the Supreme Court, instead of December as desired
by President Bush, was caused in part by political needs of
Republican senators facing opposition for re-election.
Sens. Jon Kyl of Arizona and Mike DeWine of Ohio are supporters
of Alito. But each wanted to get home in December to prepare for
strong Democratic challenges. . . . Sen. John McCain, a
potential 2008 Republican presidential candidate, has gotten a
tepid response to a New York City fund-raiser Monday for his
"Straight Talk America" political action committee. . . .
Many New York contributors to McCain's 2000 presidential
campaign were reluctant to attend this year's event. The fact
McCain will be 72 years old for the 2008 presidential campaign
was cited to explain lack of enthusiasm, as was the senator's
support for the Iraq war.
N.J. governor's race enters final weekend amid heightened
negativity - Angela Delli Santi (AP)
With the New Jersey governor's race reaching new levels
of acrimony in the home stretch, the two major candidates faced
off on live television Saturday night, addressing the sleazy
turn the campaign has taken. Sitting across a small table
from each other in the WNBC Channel 4 studios, U.S. Sen. Jon
Corzine and businessman Doug Forrester were asked right off to
talk about the ugly tone of the contest.
|
|
November 4, 2005
(top)
|
Washington Post discloses
covert CIA operations
(SeanRobins.com)
 In
an article published in the November 2nd edition of the
Washington Post,
staff reporter Dana Priest, in an in-depth article, exposed the
existence of an alleged covert CIA operation concerning the
imprisonment of terror suspects being held in U.S. custody since
9/11.
Priest reveals, based upon
information obtained from unnamed "U.S. and foreign officials,"
that "[t]he secret facility is part of a covert prison system
set up by the CIA nearly four years ago that at various times
has included sites in eight countries, including Thailand,
Afghanistan and several democracies in Eastern Europe, as well
as a small center at the Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba,
according to current and former intelligence officials and
diplomats from three continents." Notes Priest, "the CIA
has not even acknowledged the existence of its black sites."
More -->
YELLOW JOURNALISM ALERT:
Times cuts patriotism from
Marine's letter (SeanRobins.com)
To make one of their
signature slams on the war in Iraq, the military, George
Bush and the United States. . .as is their custom. .
.the good folks at the New York Times, in a story
in their November 2nd edition, thought well enough of a
recently-killed U.S. Marine, Cpl. Jeffrey Starr, to
excerpt the words of his last, precious letter
written home to his family, just before he died.
Of course, something got lost in the translation.
As excerpted in the
Times, the sentiment of this young soldier's missive
is decidedly depressive, and paints his circumstance as
simply one of the many poor wretches, wrested
pointlessly from their safe, stateside homes, into a war
that spelled their doom:
I kind of predicted
this ... A third time just seemed like I’m pushing
my chances.
Now, how the passage
from the Marine's letter originally read, the
words of a man in control of his own destiny, fulfilling
his duty to a personal calling on behalf of his country,
and on behalf of something higher, that the wretched
liberals at the Times who pimped his letter will
never be able to understand:
I kind of predicted
this, that is why I’m writing this in November. A
third time just seemed like I’m pushing my chances.
I don’t regret going, everybody dies but few get to
do it for something as important as freedom. It may
seem confusing why we are in Iraq, it’s not to me.
I’m here helping these people, so that they can live
the way we live. Not have to worry about tyrants or
vicious dictators. To do what they want with their
lives. To me that is why I died. Others have died
for my freedom, now this is my mark.”
Cpl. Starr's family is,
quite understandably, outraged at the Times'
assault on their son's final words.
|
The real global virus; The plague of Islamism keeps on
spreading - Victor Davis Hanson (National Review)
Either the jihadists really are crazy or they apparently
think that they have a shot at destabilizing, or at least
winning concessions from, the United States, Europe, India,
and Russia all at once. Apart from the continual
attacks on civilians by terrorists in Iraq, Afghanistan, and
the West Bank, there have now been recent horrific assaults
in New Dehli (blowing up civilians in a busy shopping season
on the eve of a Hindu festival), Russia (attacking police
and security facilities), London (suicide murdering of
civilians on the subway), and Indonesia (more bombing, and
the beheading of Christian schoolgirls). The loci of recent
atrocities could be widely expanded (e.g., Malaysia, North
Africa, Turkey, Spain) — and, of course, do not forget the
several terrorist plots that have been broken up in Europe
and the United States.
New polls have Corzine losing ground; one shows dead heat -
Jeffrey Gold (AP)
Two polls released Friday have Democratic gubernatorial
candidate Jon S. Corzine losing some ground to Republican Doug
Forrester, with one putting the race in a dead heat with the
election just four days away. The erosion of support for
the Democratic U.S. senator appears to coincide with a harsh ad
featuring comment from his ex-wife, although nearly eight in 10
registered voters told one poll the ad made no difference to
them. A Fairleigh Dickinson University-PublicMind poll
found the race was too close to call and that favorable ratings
of both candidates declined from prior polls.
Tuesday's "closed
session": 1st time called without consent of other party -
Noel Sheppard (NewsBusters.org)
As reported by NewsBusters, there was a lot about the closed
session held in the Senate on Tuesday that the media chose to
ignore. However, now that the damage has been done, and
public opinions of this issue have been formed, the Washington
Post today decided to share some of the facts with its readers.
First, the decision to have a closed session is normally made
with the consent of both parties: “The rule's existence
was widely known, and closed sessions had been held by
bipartisan agreement as recently as 1999, regarding President
Bill Clinton's impeachment. But the notion of one party
springing the rule on the other party without warning was so
alien that senators could not cite a previous example.”
Paris continues burning as the chickens come home to roost -
Robert Spencer (FrontPageMagazine.com)
Riots have now continued
for eight days in and around
Paris.
Thursday night, November 3, Muslim rioters burned 315 cars. In
the previous week, they torched 177 vehicles and burned numerous
businesses, a post office, and two schools. They have rampaged
through twenty towns and shot at police and firemen. In an
episode that summed up the failure of
France’s
efforts to create a domestic, domesticated Islam, when moderate
Muslim leader Dalil Boubakeur, head of the
Paris
mosque, tried to restore calm, his car was pelted with stones
and he had to rush away. The riots began
on
October 27 when two Muslim teenagers ran from police who were
checking identification papers — why they ran is as yet unclear.
The police did not chase them, but evidently the teenagers
thought they were being chased; they eventually hid in an
electrical power sub-station, where they accidentally
electrocuted themselves. That night young Muslims took to the
streets for the first time, throwing rocks and bottles at
police, burning cars, and vandalizing property.
Senate panel recommends perjury prosecution of Galloway -
David R. Sands (Washington Times)
A Senate panel yesterday formally referred to U.S. and British
legal authorities its finding that British lawmaker George
Galloway lied under oath when he denied taking secret payoffs
under the Iraq oil-for-food program. Investigators with
the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs permanent
subcommittee on investigations said Mr. Galloway faces charges
of perjury and obstructing a congressional inquiry for his
flamboyant May 17 testimony, in which he categorically denied
any wrongdoing and called the Senate probe "the mother of all
smoke screens." Subcommittee Chairman Norm Coleman, Minnesota
Republican, and ranking minority member Sen. Carl Levin,
Michigan Democrat, said their findings have been sent to the
Justice Department, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District
of New York, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia and
the district attorney for New York County.
Michael Moore owned Halliburton, defense stocks - Jim Meyers
(NewsMax.com)
Filmmaker Michael Moore has made a
career out of trashing corporations and said he doesn't own any
stocks due to moral principle. How then did author Peter
Schweizer uncover IRS documents showing that Moore's very own
foundation has bought stocks in some of America's largest
corporations – including Halliburton, other defense contractors
and some of the same companies he has attacked?
U.N. agency honors anti-Semitic composer, Mikis Theodorakis
(AFP)
UNESCO awarded
its International Music Prize 2005 to 'Zorba the Greek' composer
Mikis Theodorakis for his contributions to understanding between
cultures and the advancement of peace. The 80-year-old
known to most Greeks simply as "Mikis" accepted the award in the
western city of Aachen saying he "could never have been anything
else but a musician". He was chosen among 40 nominees for the
prize, initiated in 1975. [Editor's Note: In 2003,
Theodorakis commented
that Jews were "the root of all evil."]
Washington Post profits dip precipitously (AP)
Newspaper
publisher Washington Post Co. said Friday its third-quarter
profit fell 19 percent, weighed down by hurricane-related
charges and lost revenue at its cable division. Earnings
after preferred dividends fell to $66.3 million, or $6.89 per
share, in the three months ended Oct. 2 from $82.2 million, or
$8.57 per share, last year. Revenue rose 7 percent to $873.7
million from $820 million.
Sen.
Levin: Al-Jazeera critic not suitable for Pentagon (OpinionJournal.com)
Donald Rumsfeld wants Dorrance Smith to be confirmed as
assistant secretary of defense for public affairs--but there's a
hitch. Sen. Carl Levin (D., Mich.) has latched on to an op-ed
about reporting in an age of terrorism that Mr. Smith wrote for
this newspaper on April 25 and pronounced him unfit for the
Pentagon job. Mr. Smith's alleged sin? To summarize Sen. Levin's
complaints at an Oct. 25 grilling of the nominee: "Unfair
labeling." You decide. In the course of his op-ed (which
you can read
here), Mr. Smith
criticized the U.S. media's habit of routinely broadcasting
terrorist statements and tapes obtained from the Arab-language
broadcaster al-Jazeera and raised questions that many Americans
have asked themselves: By airing such footage--of insurgents in
Iraq holding hostages or attacking U.S soldiers and of al Qaeda
officials promising death and destruction--do TV networks
effectively (if unwittingly) enter into a propaganda partnership
with terrorists?
The
enemy on our airwaves - Dorrance Smith (Orig. publ. Apr. 25,
2005 - Wall Street Journal)
On April 11, Jeffrey Ake, an American, was taken hostage in
Iraq. Video of him in captivity was shown on al-Jazeera on
April 13. A short time later six American networks--ABC, NBC,
CBS, Fox, CNN and MSNBC--aired the same video, a vivid example
of the ongoing relationship between terrorists, al-Jazeera and
the networks. Last week, al-Jazeera showed video of a helicopter
being shot, bursting into flames and trailing smoke as it fell
to the ground. It also aired video of the lone survivor being
forced to walk on a broken leg and then being shot by the
terrorists, one of whom said, "We are applying God's law."
As the war continues, more hostages will be taken and acts of
murderous violence committed--leading to more videos for
al-Jazeera and the networks. Isn't it time to scrutinize the
relationship among al-Jazeera, American networks and the
terrorists? What role should the U.S. government be playing?
Ratherate bloggers honored with investigative journalism award
- Roger Aronoff (AccuracyinMedia.org)
In memory of Reed Irvine, founder of Accuracy in Media, AIM is
awarding its first annual Reed Irvine Investigative Journalism
award to two of the bloggers responsible for exposing
Rathergate—Dan Rather's use of forged documents to smear
President Bush. This episode was a milestone in the history of
journalism. Former CBS and current CNN executive Jonathan
Klein derided the bloggers as people "sitting in his living room
in his pajamas writing." No matter what they wore, however, they
did the research that Rather didn't. They made Rather, the
"veteran" journalist, look like a fool. One is an Atlanta
lawyer, Harry MacDougald, who writes under the name "Buckhead"
on FreeRepublic.com. He was the first to raise questions about
the authenticity of the documents that CBS posted on its website
the night of Dan Rather's report on 60 Minutes Wednesday two
months before the presidential election last year. From having
read a manual explaining the computer program Microsoft Word
shortly after it came out and was acquired by his law firm, he
knew that the CBS documents couldn't have been typed back in
1972, the year they were purported to have been written, because
typewriters from that time weren't capable of proportional
spacing the way Microsoft Word does it automatically.
Dangerous appeasement of terrorism by England's House of Bishops
- Joseph Loconte (OpinionJournal.com)
Peacemaking has always been a major theme in Christianity, and
pacifists a strong voice within the Christian tradition. The
founder of the faith, after all, is hailed by believers as the
Prince of Peace. Yet modern pacifists, for all their citations
of Scripture, seem miles away from the moral insights of
biblical religion. Nowhere is this gulf more striking than
in their posture toward terrorism. Despite the record of
gruesome violence since 9/11, many Christian leaders still
refuse to confront the radical evil of militant Islam. Just last
month, for example, England's House of Bishops released a
report--"Countering Terrorism: Power, Violence and Democracy
Post 9/11"--that managed never to mention the horrific
intentions of Osama bin Laden in the course of its 100 pages.
More ==>
Read the Report
Black Democrats slow to criticize racist attacks on Michael
Steele - S.A. Miller & Brian DeBose (Washington Times)
U.S. Rep. Benjamin L. Cardin yesterday pledged not to use
racially tinged attacks in his campaign for U.S. Senate but
stopped short of repudiating fellow Maryland Democrats who have
said such tactics are acceptable against Lt. Gov. Michael S.
Steele because he is a black conservative Republican. "I
have never in my entire life brought race into what I do in
life, and it is not going to come in now, at this stage," said
Mr. Cardin, a 10-term congressman who could face Mr. Steele in
the contest to replace retiring Sen. Paul S. Sarbanes. "I don't
think race has any place in this campaign."
Republicans considering ending "birthright" citizenship -
Stephen Dinan (Washington Times)
House Republicans are looking closely at ending birthright
citizenship and building a barrier along the entire U.S.-Mexico
border as they search for solutions to illegal immigration.
A task force of party leaders and members active on immigration
has met since the summer to try to figure out where consensus
exists, and several participants said those two ideas have
floated to the top of the list of possibilities to be included
either in an immigration-enforcement bill later this year or in
a later comprehensive immigration overhaul. "There is a
general agreement about the fact that citizenship in this
country should not be bestowed on people who are the children of
folks who come into this country illegally," said Rep. Tom
Tancredo, Colorado Republican, who is participating in the
"unity dinners," the group of Republicans trying to find
consensus on immigration.
Paris-area riots gain dangerous momentum - Jamey Keaten (U.K.
Guardian)
A week of riots in poor neighborhoods outside Paris gained
dangerous new momentum Thursday, with youths shooting at police
and firefighters and attacking trains and symbols of the French
state. Facing mounting criticism, Prime Minister Dominique
de Villepin vowed to restore order as the violence that erupted
Oct. 27 spread to at least 20 towns, highlighting the
frustration simmering in housing projects that are home to many
North African immigrants.
Dick
Morris points the finger of levee failure at Mary Landrieu (WAFB-TV)
It's
not the first time someone has criticized the way money from
Congress was not used appropriately to shore up the levee system
that failed during hurricane Katrina. But on Nine News Thursday
morning, the former advisor to former president Bill Clinton
named names. Dick Morris says over the last few years,
Washington funded hundreds of millions of dollars to strengthen
the levee system, but some of our senators spent it on something
else.
Dems stunned at anti-abortion Jimmy Carter - Ralph Z. Hallow
(Washington Times)
Former President Jimmy
Carter yesterday condemned all abortions and chastised his party
for its intolerance of candidates and nominees who oppose
abortion. "I never have felt that any abortion should be
committed -- I think each abortion is the result of a series of
errors," he told reporters over breakfast at the
Ritz-CarltonHotel, while across town Senate Democrats
deliberated whether to filibuster the nomination of Judge Samuel
A. Alito Jr. because he may share President Bush and Mr.
Carter's abhorrence of abortion. "These things impact
other issues on which [Mr. Bush] and I basically agree," the
Georgia Democrat said. "I've never been convinced, if you let me
inject my Christianity into it, that Jesus Christ would approve
abortion."
|
|
November 3, 2005
(top)
|
The "lying
lies" of Bill Clinton
(SeanRobins.com)
He may be five years out of office, but former President William
Jefferson Clinton--the first "black" president--who only
lied about sex in the Oral (ooops...Oval) Office, just
can't seem to stop that lying. Americas "First Black
President" was in Detroit yesterday,
giving a eulogy
at the funeral of civil rights icon, Rosa Parks when, as is his
custom, ol' Billy Boy began ta spinnin' another one of his
yarns. The ex-Prez got to thinkin' back upon his boyhood
days, down in Stone Mountain...er, Hope, Arkansas.
It was a lovely summer's
afternoon...the Calla Lilies were in bloom...uh, er...something
or other... As we drift back in time to the lazier daze of
Billy-Boy Clinton's youth, ... a fog enshrouds our
consciousnesses--at least it did those in attendance
yesterday--listening closely to Bill's voice, as his words seep
into our minds, we enter the liberal coma that his words invoke:
I remember as if it were
yesterday that fateful day 50 years ago. I was a
nine-year-old Southern white boy who rode a segregated
bus every single day of my life. I sat in the front.
Black folk sat in the back. When Rosa showed us that
black folks didn't have to sit in the back anymore, two
of my friends and I who strongly approved of what she
had done decided we didn't have to sit in the front
anymore.
Now, let's see. Nine years
old? Its 2005, minus fifty years, makes it 1955. A
quick
Wikipedia check
confirms that Billy-Boy was born in 1946. Add nine years
to 1946 gets us up to 1955. Okay, that part of the story
seems to check out. Fifty years ago, Bill Clinton was
nine years old. He talks about hearing of and being
inspired by word of
Rosa Parks'
famous act of civil disobedience, when on December 1, 1995, she
disregarded the law requiring that she sit in the back of a
Montgomery, Alabama transit bus, rather than the front, and was
arrested. Again, okay, the year checks out.
The final bit of his story is
just a little bit more problematic. This is where Bill's
story falls apart. Clinton relates the defiant, if only
symbolic, act of three Southern white boys (himself and two
friends), in solidarity with Rosa Parks, choosing to
forgo the privilege of sitting in the front of the bus, and
taking their seats in the back. Only problem: Does anybody
remember that lil' ol' U.S. Supreme Court decision, Brown vs.
Board of Education? It was the 1955 case which held that
"separate" was not actually "equal," and therefore, segregated
public schools were unconstitutional. Yes, Bill did
kinda get the year right...well, sort of. 1955 was the
year of that the Supreme Court ruled that blacks and whites
should be educated in the same schools. However...and
it is a big however.
Local officials, in states like
Arkansas, didn't take so kindly to the Court's
"interference," and refused to voluntarily desegregate their
schools. Remember the Little Rick Nine? A
handful of black high school students who attempted to attend
the previously all-White Little Rock Central High School.
The governor sent in the National Guard to prevent their
attendance. And President Eisenhower sent federal troops
to Little Rock to enforce the order of the Supreme Court.
The feds trumped the state, the kids went to school, and the
rest is history. Unfortunately--for Bill's little
story--this happened in 1957--not 1955. It was not
until the federally forced desegregation of the Little Rock high
school--in 1957--that black and white school students
attended school together--or rode the bus to school together.
In other words--for anyone who
isn't yet "in the picture"--in 1955, Bill Clinton would not have
been in the position of sharing a bus ride to school with black
children, and simply could not have made the symbolic gesture of
sitting in the back of such a racially-segregated bus.
Ironically, it would not have been until the advent of school
desegregation, that black and white children would have had any
reason to have been on the same segregated bus. As usual,
Bill Clinton's little story is an utter fabrication. How
pathetic. As well, those who so willingly fall for the
lying lies of Bill Clinton.
Harassing Mama
Alito - Matt Drudge (DrudgeReport.com)
The DRUDGE REPORT has learned from exclusive sources that
Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr.’s 90 year-old mother
Rose has become a prisoner in her own Hamilton, NJ home because
of a barrage of media requests. The quiet neighborhood
Mrs. Alito has lived in for over 50 years has been turned upside
down all week by a swarm of national reporters who have phoned
and shown up at the doorstep of not only her but many of her
neighbors.
Paris area rioting spreads to 20 towns - Jamey Keaten (AP)
Rampaging youths shot at police and firefighters Thursday after
burning car dealerships and public buses and hurling rocks at
commuter trains, as eight days of riots over poor conditions in
Paris-area housing projects spread to 20 towns. Youths
ignored an appeal for calm from President Jacques Chirac, whose
government worked feverishly to fend off a political crisis amid
criticism that it has ignored problems in neighborhoods heavily
populated by first- and second-generation North African and
Muslim immigrants.
How Democrats lie about "he lied us into war" (OpinionJournal.com)
Harry Reid pulled the Senate into closed session Tuesday,
claiming that "The Libby indictment provides a window into what
this is really all about, how this Administration manufactured
and manipulated intelligence in order to sell the war in Iraq."
But the Minority Leader's statement was as demonstrably false as
his stunt was transparently political. What Mr. Reid's
pose is "really all about" is the emergence of the Clare Boothe
Luce Democrats. We're referring to the 20th-century playwright,
and wife of Time magazine founder Henry Luce, who was most
famous for declaring that Franklin D. Roosevelt had "lied us
into war" with the Nazis and Tojo. So intense was the hatred of
FDR among some Republicans that they held fast to this slander
for years, with many taking their paranoia to their graves.
Russert's denial contradicted by Andrea Mitchell (NewsMax.com)
NBC Washington bureau chief Tim
Russert told Leakgate probers that he had no idea Joe Wilson's
wife Valerie Plame was a CIA employee before her name surfaced
in Robert Novak's fateful July 14, 2003 column, and that he was
stunned upon learning that Lewis "Scooter" Libby claimed he got
that information from him. But an account by senior NBC
correspondent Andrea Mitchell raises questions about whether Mr.
Russert may have known about Plame's employment well before the
Novak column.
Al Franken exposed: Almost never hires blacks (NewsMax.com)
Liberal radio yakker Al Franken is threatening to sue the author
of a bestselling new book that alleges he doesn't practice what
he preaches when it comes to affirmative action, according to
the author. Peter Schweizer, author of "Do As I Say, Not
as I Do," told Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly Wednesday night:
"Before the book came out, his agent, Jonathan Lazear, called my
editor at Doubleday and said they consider the material in the
book to be 'legally actionable.' They then followed up with a
letter demanding to know where I got all this, 'private
information' on Al Franken."
Parisian rioters
complaint: More and better welfare (Reuters)
Young rioters set
fire to at least 50 vehicles in an eighth night of unrest in the
impoverished suburbs of northeastern Paris as exasperated local
officials criticized politicking by national leaders.
Rioting erupted again late Thursday despite hopes that
festivities ending the fasting month of Ramadan would calm
rioters, many of them Muslims of North African origin protesting
against race bias they say keeps them in second-class status.
Senate proponents of ANWR oil drilling win vote - H. Josef
Herbert (AP)
Senate
opponents to drilling in an Alaska wildlife refuge failed
Thursday to strip the measure from a massive budget package as
supporters of exploration argued that the oil is needed to help
break America of its import habit. Environmentalists, who
believe strongly the refuge should continue to be off limits to
oil companies to protect the area's wildlife, had acknowledged
that it was a long shot to get the provision killed and now are
concentrating on defeating the overall budget bill. A vote
on the budget measure, which includes a myriad of spending cuts
from food stamps to welfare funds, was expected later in the
day.
Danny Rather: Scared of the "New Media" (NewsMax.com)
Former CBS Evening News anchor Dan Rather on Tuesday delivered a
pointed message to an audience of young people at the University
of Maine. "News is something people need to know which
someone, somewhere, doesn’t want them to know,” Rather said.
"All the rest is advertising."
Legal sniping continues in DeLay case; Admin judge recuses self
from new judge appointment - April Castro (AP)
Two
days after U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay won a fight to get a new judge in
his case, prosecutors on Thursday succeeded in ousting the
Republican jurist responsible for selecting the new judge.
Administrative Judge B.B. Schraub recused himself after District
Attorney Ronnie Earle filed a motion asking for his removal from
the case. Schraub said he will ask the chief justice of
the Texas Supreme Court name a judge to preside over DeLay's
conspiracy and money laundering trial.
Google's massive hold-up - Pat Schroeder & Bob Barr (Washington
Times)
You're probably reading the byline above and wondering, "What
could these two, from opposite sides of the aisle in Congress,
possibly have in common with each other?" The answer is
when it comes to Google's Print Library Project we have much in
common: We're both authors and both believe intellectual
property should actually mean something.
|
|
November 2, 2005
(top)
|
Who said what and
when on Weapons of Mass Destruction? (SeanRobins.com)
After a particularly cheap
stunt, orchestrated by Senate minority whip, Harry Reid,
invoking an obscure Senate rule, transforming the chamber into a
meeting of the Skull & Bones Society--reaction has been swift,
widespread and harsh, in recognition of the further minimization
of the Democratic Party. Not only was Reid's "closed-door
session" trick a pointless, and brainless, waste of the Senate's
time, but it was a complete fraud. Reid proclaimed that
his stunt was necessary to highlight, says he, the refusal of
Senate Republicans to complete "phase II" of an investigation
into alleged intentionally falsified pre-war Iraq WMD
intelligence. . . . White House press secretary, Scott
McClellan, fired the first "official" volley this morning in
response to Reid and Co.'s clamor for answers about pre-war
intelligence and WMD's. Said McClellan: "If Democrats want
to talk about the threat that Saddam Hussein posed and the
intelligence, they might want to start with looking at the
previous administration and their own statements that they've
made." What a really great idea.
Click here to
read what the Dems said about WMD's before the war.
Samuel Alito: Testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee,
on his nomination to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals -
April 5, 1990 (U.S. Senate)
Available here, the entirety of Judge Alito's testimony before
the Senate Judiciary Committee, from his 1990 nomination to a
seat on the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Here, he
is questioned by Sens. Kennedy and Specter. Said Kennedy
at the time: "You
have obviously had a very distinguished record, and I certainly
commend you for long service in the public interest. I think it is a
very commendable career and I am sure you will have a successful
one as a judge." Also: Read Judge Alito's
responses to
the Senate questionaire, submitted in support of his
nomination to the Third Circuit - Feb. 24, 1990.
Sen. Frank
Lautenberg: Floor speech on nomination of Samuel Alito for Third
Circuit Court of Appeals - April 27, 1990 (Congressional
Record)
Mr. President, I rise in support of the nomination of Samuel
Alito , Jr. to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Sam Alito is an accomplished and distinguished lawyer. He has
dedicated himself to Government service and he has excelled.
He is a graduate of Princeton University. He was a member of phi
beta kappa. He attended the Yale Law School, where he
contributed to the Law Journal.
Folly of French socialism, political correctness, exposed by
week-long riot spree (AP)
Menacing youths smoked cigarettes in doorways Wednesday and
hulks of burned cars littered the tough streets of Paris'
northeastern suburbs scarred by a week of riots that left
residents on edge and sent the government into crisis mode.
In a seventh consecutive night of skirmishes, young people threw
rocks at police Wednesday in six suburbs in the
Seine-Saint-Denis region north of Paris . . . Some said the
unrest — sparked by the accidental deaths of two teenagers last
week — is an expression of frustration over grinding
unemployment and police harassment in the communities, where
many North African immigrants live.
Why Paris is burning - James Graff (Time)
Officially, the French state doesn't recognize minorities, only
citizens of France, all of them equal under the law. But that
republican ideal has seemed especially hollow over the past week
as the children of impoverished, largely Muslim immigrants from
the Maghreb and sub-Saharan Africa fought running battles with
police throughout the banlieues, or suburbs, to the east and
north of the French capital. On Sunday night, tear gas from a
police canister filled the air in a Muslim prayer hall, sending
worshipers out into the street gasping for air—and enraged at an
act of desecration for which the police denied responsibility.
By Wednesday, after five nights of violence, more than three
dozen arrests had been made as the rioting spread from community
to community—one official even warned that it threatened to
become an "insurrection." And France's political class was
embroiled in a fierce debate over how best to put a lid on their
boiling banlieues.
McClellan: Dems should look at their own pre-war statements
(AP)
The White House is wading into the congressional spat over the
run-up to war in Iraq. A day after Democrats forced a surprise
closed-door Senate session, White House press secretary Scott
McClellan said Democrats might want to check their own notes
from the pre-war years. "If Democrats want to talk about
the threat that Saddam Hussein posed and the intelligence, they
might want to start with looking at the previous administration
and their own statements that they've made," McClellan said
Wednesday. He said the Clinton administration and fellow
Democrats "used the intelligence to come to the same conclusion
that Saddam Hussein and his regime were a threat."
On Exhibit: The contemptuousness of the Democratic Party (TownHall.com)
When even Chris
Matthews--leftie jibber-jabberer of MSNBC's Hardball--finds
himself disgusted with the Democrats, you have to know that
something really bad is afoot. In this case, the
Dems have been circulating a "not for attribution" slime sheet
which, among other things, insinuates that Judge "Scalito" threw
a prosecution--actually, what may have been the longest federal
criminal prosecution in history--of a bunch of Italian
gangsters. The slander sheet quotes Alito as concluding:
"you can't win them all." A truly disgusting display, by a
bunch of losers, who don't have the courage of their
"unatributed" convictions. However, according to research
on
RedState.org, the
metadata contained within the original Microsoft Word file (see
it
here), identifies
the author of this liberal hit piece as one "C. Prendergast,"
believed to be
Chris Prendergast,
an employee of the Democratic National Committee.
Dems seek to delay the inevitable: Alito's confirmation hearings
- Daivd Espo (AP)
Senate
Democrats pushed on Tuesday for a 2006 date for hearings on
Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito, challenging President Bush's
call for confirmation by year's end. "There's no way you
can do an honest hearing by the end of December, or a fair
hearing," said Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the senior
Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee. In a jab at
the White House and the Senate Republican leadership, Leahy said
he and the panel's chairman, Sen. Arlen Specter could likely
agree on a date for confirmation hearings if left to themselves.
Breaking ranks: Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson looks favorably upon
Alito - Jesse J. Holland (Washington Post)
A centrist Democratic senator complimented Supreme Court nominee
Samuel Alito Wednesday as a jurist who won't "hammer away and
chisel away" existing law. While Sen. Ben Nelson did not
endorse President Bush's latest nominee for the high court, he
did say he was impressed by what he heard from Alito during his
introductory visit. The Nebraska Democrat, who was Alito's
first senatorial host Wednesday, told reporters that he got
assurances that Alito would not be "judicial activist" or "take
an agenda to the bench" if confirmed to succeed Associate
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who is retiring.
|
|
November 1, 2005
(top)
|
Final analysis: The
Democrats are irrelevant to the decision (SeanRobins.com)
Blustery speeches, reddened
faces, and stammering yammering from the likes of Teddy Kennedy,
Chuckie Schumer and Harry Reid, notwithstanding, as with the
Roberts nomination, the Democrats are largely irrelevant in the
determination of whether Sam Alito is confirmed as the next
Associate Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court. The Dems will
be unable to put forth any coherent, principled basis for
rejecting Alito while accepting Roberts, nor will they be able
to explain away their prior two unanimous confirmations of
Alito, in 1987 for U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey,
and in 1990 for a seat on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
They will argue the usual nonsense--based solely upon their fear
that this nomination might provide the tipping point for Roe
v. Wade--that Alito is "out of the mainstream" of American
thought, without being able to understand themselves what that
"mainstream" really is.
More -->
The left
got what it asked for - Wesley Pruden (Washington Times)
California is as far from the reality where the rest of us live
as you can get and still keep your feet dry. Californians think
Geena Davis, the star of the new television fantasy "Commander
in Chief," really is the commander in chief. So when the
ground shifted yesterday with the nomination of Samuel Alito to
the United States Supreme Court -- a solid 7 on the Richter
scale -- nearly everyone here wondered why that nice, sensible
President Davis would have done something like that. . . . The
early action in Washington is media skirmishing, as the players
jostle and jiggle for position against the day when it will be
time to lock and load. The high priests of secularism are
desperate to protect the rite of abortion, which is to the
noisily devout of the left what the doctrine of the Virgin Birth
is to orthodox Christianity.
Alito had peaceful confirmation hearing - Jesse J. Holland (AP)
Fifteen years ago, Samuel Alito told senators at his
confirmation hearing that judges shouldn't "step over the line"
into lawmaking or "try to pigeonhole the case or to import a
judge's own view of the law into the law," records showed
Monday. President Bush has nominated Alito, a federal
appeals court judge from New Jersey, for the Supreme Court seat
of retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Alito would replace
White House counsel Harriet Miers, who withdrew her nomination
last week amid opposition from conservatives.
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner: Statement of nomination of Alito -
October 31, 2005 (U.S. House of Representatives)
President Bush today nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court an
outstanding and accomplished jurist in Judge Samuel Alito. Judge
Alito has earned widespread respect for his judicial intellect
and for his respect and dedication to the law. Prior to his
fifteen years of distinguished service on the Third Circuit
Court of Appeals, Judge Alito served in numerous high-level
positions at the Justice Department, including arguing a dozen
cases before the Supreme Court. Judge Alito’s qualifications and
characteristics led to his unanimous confirmation vote by the
Senate to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, where he has been
recognized as a fair-minded and top-notch judicial scholar. In
short, no one can question whether Judge Alito is Supreme Court
material.
Sen. Mitch
McConnell: Floor Speech on Alito Nomination - October 31,
2005 (Congressional Record)
Mr. President, this
morning the President of the United States nominated Judge
Samuel Alito of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to be the
next Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. We are beginning to
learn that Judge Alito has an extremely impressive career. He is
an alumnus of Princeton, where he was a member of Phi Beta
Kappa. He graduated from Yale Law School where he was editor of
the Yale Law Journal, and he clerked for Judge Leonard Garth on
the same court where Judge Alito now sits. Judge Alito has
devoted his professional life to serving our country. He served
in the U.S. Army Reserves. He served as an assistant U.S.
attorney in the appellate division and as a U.S. Attorney for
the District of New Jersey. He served as an assistant to the
Solicitor General where he argued 12 cases before the Supreme
Court. For the last 15 years he served as a Federal appellate
judge on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
Sen. Patrick
Leahy: Floor Speech on Alito Nomination - October 31, 2005 (Congressional
Record)
Mr. President, on Friday, the President formally withdrew from
the Senate his nomination of Harriet Miers to be Associate
Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Today, he announced his
intention to nominate Judge Samuel Alito to that same position.
To those who are keeping count, this will be the third
nomination to fill the seat vacated by the future retirement of
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor made by the President. Justice
O'Connor is still there. Three people have been nominated to
fill her seat. I am concerned that the nomination may be a
needlessly provocative nomination.
Sen. Bill Frist: Statement of Frist on nomination of Alito -
October 31, 2005 (U.S. Senate)
Senate shut down by Dems in "stunt" over old Iraq intelligence
questions - Liz Sidoti (AP)
Democrats
forced the Republican-controlled Senate into an unusual closed
session Tuesday, questioning intelligence that President Bush
used in the run-up to the war in Iraq and accusing Republicans
of ignoring the issue. "They have repeatedly chosen to
protect the Republican administration rather than get to the
bottom of what happened and why," Democratic leader Harry Reid
said. Taken by surprise, Republicans derided the move as a
political stunt. "The United States Senate has been
hijacked by the Democratic leadership," said Majority Leader
Bill Frist. "They have no convictions, they have no principles,
they have no ideas," the Republican leader said.
One for DeLay: "MoveOn.org" judge removed from case (AP)
Republican
U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay will get a new judge to preside over his
criminal case after his attorneys successfully argued Tuesday
that the judge's political donations created a conflict.
State Judge Bob Perkins, who has made campaign donations to
Democrats, will be replaced by another judge, said C. W. Duncan,
the judge deciding the recusal motion by DeLay. That judge was
not named Tuesday. "This is the wrong case for Judge
Perkins to judge because of his perfectly permissible activity
as a Democrat and as a partisan and as a supporter of Democratic
causes," DeLay's attorney Dick DeGuerin said after the four-hour
hearing.
Sen. DeWine foresees vote to abolish filibuster if need be on
Alito vote (AP)
Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito is "clearly within the
mainstream" and shouldn't be filibustered, declared a Republican
who helped fashion a plan limiting parliamentary roadblocks for
judicial nominees. Sen. Mike DeWine , who met with
President Bush's latest high court choice Tuesday, warned
Democrats he would side with GOP leaders to eliminate the
judicial filibuster if the minority party uses it against the
New Jersey judge. "It's hard for me to envision that
anyone would think about filibustering this nominee," said
DeWine, an Ohio Republican who sided with 13 other Republicans
and Democrats earlier this year to end a Senate stalemate over
judicial filibusters.
Abortion after reversal of Roe v. Wade - Jane Roh (FOX
News)
The two vacancies on the Supreme Court have abortion activists
on either side sounding the death knell of Roe v. Wade, the
landmark 1973 ruling overturning state laws that criminalized
abortion. But some legal scholars who support abortion
rights say that may not be such a bad thing. "Roe was
terribly reasoned," said Scott Powe, a professor at the
University of Texas School of Law. "I think there's some
requirement under the Constitution that if you cannot explain a
decision and its relationship with legal materials, it's not a
valid decision."
Both parties prepared for "armageddon" over Alito nomination
- Charles Hurt (Washington Times)
Senate Democrats and Republicans -- along with interest groups
both for and against Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr.'s Supreme Court
nomination -- fell into formation yesterday to begin the battle
they've been expecting for more than a decade. "This one
is going to be Armageddon," said Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, Utah
Republican and former chairman of the Senate Judiciary
Committee. Majority Leader Bill Frist, Tennessee
Republican, acknowledged that the fight will be tough, but
predicted confirmation before the end of the year. "In
1990, a Democrat-controlled Senate unanimously confirmed Judge
Alito as a circuit judge," Mr. Frist said in a statement
dispatched 27 minutes before President Bush announced his
selection. "I hope that my colleagues will give his nomination a
fair opportunity this time as well."
Alito nomination sets stage for idealogical battle - Peter
Baker (Washington Post)
President Bush nominated U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Samuel A.
Alito Jr. to the Supreme Court yesterday, rallying his estranged
Republican base back to his side and triggering a torrent of
liberal attacks that could foreshadow a bruising ideological
showdown over the future of the judiciary. In effect
relaunching the nomination four days after Harriet Miers
withdrew under fire, Bush selected a long-standing New Jersey
judge with an extensive record of conservative rulings on
abortion, federalism, discrimination and religion in public
spaces. If confirmed to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day
O'Connor, the swing vote in recent years, Alito seems likely to
shift the court to the right.
"RatherGate" co-conspirator, Mary Mapes, seeks to revise her
image (Editor & Publisher)
In the
upcoming December issue of Vanity Fair, Mary Mapes, the CBS News
producer who lost her job after the disputed "60 Minutes II"
Bush/National Guard report, writes, "I must answer the bloggers,
the babblers and blabbers, and the true believers who have
called me everything from 'feminazi' to an 'elitist liberal' to
an 'idiot." "If I was an idiot, it was for believing in a
free press that is able to do its job without fear or favor.
...I didn't know that the attack on our story was going to be as
effective as a brilliantly run national political campaign,
because that is what it was: a political campaign." . . . In a
statement released Monday, CBS News said: "Mary Mapes' actions
damaged CBS News as an organization and brought pain to many
colleagues with whom she worked. As always, revisionist history
must be tested against the facts." It pointed to its independent
panel's 200-page report, adding: "We believe those facts speak
for themselves."
Newspaper journalism a sinking ship - Ross Fadner (Media
Daily News)
It's official, 2005 will be the
newspaper industry's worst year since the last ad industry
recession. And things aren't looking much better for next year
either, according to a top Wall Street firm's report on
newspaper publishing. "Sadly, 2005 is shaping up as the
industry's worst year from a revenue growth perspective since
the recession impacted 2001-2002 period," says the report from
Goldman Sachs, adding a warning that meaningful growth in 2006
is "very unlikely." In particular, national advertising has
under-performed, remaining essentially flat this year, as has
the retail category, the report said--while classified, both
print and online, has shown positive gains so far this year, up
4-5 percent.
|
|